SteerCheck: Attribution Specificity and Alignment Leakage in Activation-Steering Audits

Alignment in LLMs is more brittle than commonly assumed: misalignment can be induced by adversarial prompts, benign fine-tuning, emergent misalignment, and goal misgeneralization. Recent evidence suggests that some misalignment behaviors are encoded as linear structure in activation space, making it tractable via activation steering, which could be used as a lightweight runtime defense. We implement three methods: Steer-With-Fixed-Coefficient (SwFC), which applies uniform additive steering, and two novel projection-aware methods, Steer-to-Target-Projection (StTP) and Steer-to-Mirror-Projection (StMP), that use a logistic regression decision boundary to selectively intervene only on tokens whose activations fall below the threshold. We evaluate these methods on two threat models, dishonesty and dismissiveness, using malicious system prompts as a controlled proxy for misalignment. We conduct our experiments on two architectures (Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen3.6-27B). All methods substantially recover alignment. StTP and StMP preserve general capabilities (MMLU, MT-Bench, AlpacaEval) better than uniform steering. Finally, we show that our honesty steering generalizes to out-of-distribution scenarios: a single honesty direction extracted from the aligned model significantly raises scores on the MASK benchmark, suppresses deception in multi-agent settings (Among Us), doubles the hidden-behavior discovery rate on AuditBench, and restores honesty in an emergently misaligned model.

Activation steering (AS) has emerged as a popular inference-time technique for modulating the behavior of large language models (LLMs). AS modulates model behavior in a flexible and lightweight manner by injecting task-specific steering vectors (SVs) into intermediate activations. Meanwhile, recent work has identified emergent misalignment (EM) as an emerging safety concern, whereby finetuning on unsafe examples from a narrow task unexpectedly induces broadly unsafe behavior in unrelated domains. With the increasing popularity of AS, it is pressing yet under-explored to thoroughly investigate whether AS can induce EM. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study of activation-steering-induced emergent misalignment. Specifically, (1) we identify a steering vector construction to confirm that SVs derived from a narrow task can indeed induce misalignment across broad unrelated domains. Qualitative measurement further reveals that AS-induced EM may pose more severe safety risks than finetuning-induced EM, i.e., AS elicits more actionable harmful responses with greater semantic coherence than those generated by finetuned models. (2) We characterize the properties of AS-induced EM by analyzing key steering-specific factors, including steering magnitude, the low-rank structure of the steering subspace, and the number of fine-tuning epochs used during steering-vector construction. (3) We evaluate the robustness and sensitivity of AS-induced EM across diverse model families, model scales, target tasks, and intervention layers. Our findings reveal activation steering as a significant yet underexamined source of emergent misalignment and provide an activation-space perspective on emergent misalignment and its safety risks.

Applying steering vectors to large language models (LLMs) is an efficient and effective model alignment technique, but we lack an interpretable explanation for how it works--specifically, what internal mechanisms steering vectors affect and how this results in different model outputs. To investigate the causal mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of steering vectors, we conduct a comprehensive case study on refusal. We propose a multi-token activation patching framework and discover that different steering methodologies leverage functionally interchangeable circuits when applied at the same layer. These circuits reveal that steering vectors primarily interact with the attention mechanism through the OV circuit while largely ignoring the QK circuit. Freezing all attention scores during steering drops performance by only 8.83% across three model families. A mathematical decomposition of the steered OV circuit further reveals semantically interpretable concepts, even in cases where the steering vector itself does not. Leveraging the activation patching results, we show that steering vectors can be sparsified by up to 85-96% while retaining most performance, and that different steering methodologies agree on a subset of important dimensions.