cs.CVAug 25, 2026

What Do Audio-Visual Synchronization Metrics Actually Measure?

Authors: Jai Kumar Sharma, Peeyush Tapadiya

Organizations: Virginia Tech · Accenture

Abstract

Automatic AV-sync metrics are widely used to rank and train audio-visual generators, but they are rarely audited as measurement instruments. We jointly audit AV-Align, ImageBind AV-relevance, JavisScore, and Synchformer/DeSync under a common reliability protocol: controlled-distortion monotonicity, preprocessing sensitivity, rank uncertainty, cross-metric agreement, PEAVS-proxy agreement, and learned fusion. The result is an axis split, not a single winner: Synchformer/DeSync is the strongest temporal-offset tracker (τ=0.84τ=0.84), ImageBind/JavisScore better match the PEAVS human-aligned proxy (τ=0.20τ=0.20) and content-disruption families, and AV-Align is the weakest standalone metric. The metrics mutually disagree (Krippendorff α=0.066α=0.066), and neither linear nor simple kk-NN fusion improves PEAVS agreement over the best individual metric. We recommend reporting AV-sync as a Reliability Card (metric-family breakdowns with confidence intervals) rather than a single bare synchronization score.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables5 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Jul 10, 2026

Beyond Time Shifts: Adapting Omni-LLM as a Reference-Free Evaluator for Generative Audio-Visual Models

As audio-visual generative models evolve into world simulators, cross-modal synchronization stands as a critical proxy for assessing the consistency of world dynamics and causality in generated content. However, existing evaluation metrics presume structural correctness, reducing synchronization to mere temporal alignment. Consequently, they fail on generative outputs, especially when exhibiting structural hallucinations and asymmetric cross-modal relations, which currently mandate expert human annotation to assess synchronization. This dependency introduces a critical paradox: human evaluators rely on relative, reference-dependent comparisons, whereas automated metrics require reference-free, absolute scalars. We resolve this paradox by proposing a framework that distills relative human perception into a continuous, globally consistent metric. First, we introduce SynthSync, a dataset of generative failures ranked via pairwise human annotations. Second, we adapt the Omni-LLM equipped with a continuous latent projection to translate relative human rankings into continuous absolute values. Third, we propose Real-Valued Group Relative Policy Optimization (R\mathbb{R}-GRPO) to internalize the global causal structure of synchronization via listwise score distributions. Empirically, our metric achieves state-of-the-art human preference alignment. We leverage this estimator to establish a standardized benchmark, advancing AV-Gen assessment from low-level signal correlation to visually grounded causality.
Jul 1, 2026

AV-SyncBench: Decoupled Benchmarking of Temporal and Semantic Audio-Visual Synchronization

Audio-visual feature extraction is a fundamental component of multimodal understanding and generation tasks. However, existing evaluation protocols for feature extraction models exhibit dimensional bias, typically focusing on either semantic matching or temporal offset detection. Moreover, their data construction remains coupled, preventing independent assessment of temporal and semantic consistency. We propose AV-SyncBench, the first benchmark to fully separate temporal and semantic evaluation for audio-visual synchronization. Built from in-the-wild videos, it spans Voice, Music, and Sound across 10 scenarios and 5 challenge tasks. Data are automatically filtered and manually verified to ensure on-screen sound sources. The benchmark contains 3,269 videos and 38,390 samples, and we evaluate five representative models to quantify feature quality for alignment and downstream tasks. The code and dataset are available at: https://fgt7t6g.github.io/AV-SyncBench.
Oct 12, 2026

SyncReward: Human-Aligned Synchronization Reward for Audio-Visual Generation

Recent years have witnessed rapid progress in joint audio--visual generation. However, audio--visual synchronization remains a challenge, as generated speech and sound often temporally misalign with visual events. A key bottleneck is the lack of human-annotated data, reliable evaluation benchmarks, and synchronization-aware evaluation models for generated audio--visual outputs. To address these limitations, we conduct a comprehensive study spanning data, benchmarking, and reward modeling. We first introduce SyncReward-Data-80K, a dataset containing 80K professional synchronization ratings for clips from eight audio--visual generators. A taxonomy-guided construction pipeline covers four sound-event families: Speech, Onset, Instrument, and Ambient. We further construct SyncReward-Bench, a held-out benchmark of 1K clips, each independently rated by multiple professionals. Using this benchmark, we systematically evaluate specialized synchronization metrics and omni-modal models, revealing their substantial misalignment with human judgments. Finally, we develop SyncReward, a reward model that combines semantic--temporal contrastive pretraining on real clips with human supervision on generated clips. As an evaluation metric, SyncReward achieves the strongest agreement with human ratings among the evaluated methods. As a reward, it improves synchronization through inference-time best-of-NN selection and reinforcement learning based post-training. We will release the data, benchmark, model, and code at https://github.com/WeChatCV/SyncReward.