When RAG Fails to Equalize: Geo-bias in Factual Question Answering over Public Companies

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models frequently produce answers grounded in parametric memory rather than the retrieved context, undermining the core promise of retrieval augmentation. A fundamental obstacle to fixing this unfaithfulness is the lack of training data that explicitly requires models to prefer context over internal knowledge. We introduce Faithfulness-QA, a large-scale dataset of 99,094 samples constructed through counterfactual entity substitution. Starting from two established extractive QA benchmarks--SQuAD and TriviaQA--we automatically identify answer-bearing named entities in each context, replace them with type-consistent alternatives drawn from a curated bank of 76,953 entities, and thereby manufacture controlled knowledge conflicts between context and parametric memory. Rigorous quality filtering ensures 100% pass rates across four automated checks on random 200-sample audits. We release the full dataset, the construction pipeline, and a typed entity bank covering eight named entity categories. Faithfulness-QA is designed as a training resource for attention-based faithfulness objectives and as an evaluation benchmark for measuring context-grounding behavior in RAG systems. Data and code are available at https://github.com/qzhangFDU/faithfulness-qa-dataset.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a powerful and widely used approach for improving large language models by grounding generation in retrieved evidence. However, RAG systems still produce incorrect answers in many cases. Why RAG fails despite having access to external information remains poorly understood. We present a model-internal study of retrieval-augmented generation that examines how retrieved evidence influences answer generation. Using circuit tracing, we construct attribution graphs that model the flow of information through transformer layers during decoding. These graphs represent interactions among retrieved context, intermediate model activations, and generated tokens, providing a graph, circuit-level view of how external evidence is integrated into the model's reasoning process across multiple question answering benchmarks, we observe consistent structural differences: correct predictions exhibit deeper reasoning paths, more distributed evidence flow, and a more structured pattern of local connectivity, while failed predictions show shallower, fragmented, and overly concentrated evidence flow. Building on these findings, we develop a graph-based error detection framework that uses attribution-graph topology features. Furthermore, we show that attribution graphs enable targeted interventions. By reinforcing question-constrained evidence grounding, we reshape internal routing so that answer generation remains guided by the question, leading to more effective integration of retrieved information and fewer errors.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates knowledge obsolescence and factual hallucination in large language models by introducing external context. However, when retrieved knowledge conflicts with the model's internal parametric knowledge, the model may either blindly follow misleading context or incorrectly rely on parametric knowledge, leading to unreliable responses. To address this issue, this paper proposes TRACE (Debate-TRace and Answer-Completeness rEgularized fine-tuning), a robust fine-tuning framework for RAG under knowledge conflicts. First, we propose a fine-tuning method that leverages multi-agent debate traces to extract correct candidates, incorrect candidates, and answer-shift patterns, providing fine-grained supervision for reliable knowledge-source selection. In addition, we design an answer completeness regularization mechanism to alleviate empty, overly short, and prematurely terminated responses via answer-tail token reinforcement and premature termination suppression. The fine-tuning objective combines correct-answer supervision, incorrect-candidate suppression, answer-tail token reinforcement, and premature termination suppression, enabling the model to use reliable external context, resist misleading or irrelevant retrieved content, and fall back to parametric knowledge when retrieved evidence is unreliable. Experiments across multiple knowledge-conflict scenarios and datasets show that TRACE improves robustness against misleading retrieved knowledge and reduces incomplete answers. These results demonstrate that multi-agent debate traces and answer completeness regularization jointly enhance knowledge-source selection, conflict robustness, and answer quality in RAG models. Our code is available at https://github.com/PHD-lanyu/TRACE.