Policy Gradient for Parallel State Entropy maximization (PGPSE) expands state-space coverage by training independently parameterized policies in replicated copies of the same environment. However, its pooled team-entropy score measures only collective exploration and cannot identify policies that contribute non-redundant coverage. We introduce Marginal Coverage Credit for PGPSE (MCC-PGPSE), which combines leave-one-policy-out coverage with state-owner specialization to estimate policy-specific credit. MCC-PGPSE preserves PGPSE's pooled objective and redistributes non-negative auxiliary intrinsic rewards according to these credits without changing their total mass. This redistribution is designed to discourage redundant visitation and promote complementary coverage. We evaluated MCC-PGPSE in controlled environments, seven public discrete-state benchmarks, and representative Room and Maze settings from the original PGPSE protocol. Across all tested settings, MCC-PGPSE produced positive final window gains in normalized team state entropy and state support over the Entropy baseline. Controlled-task comparisons and the fixed-suite public aggregate were significant, whereas five-seed original-protocol comparisons were directionally consistent. Ablations and credit alignment controls indicate that most gains arise from leave-one-policy-out coverage rather than non-uniform weighting, mismatched credit, or neural novelty alone. These results support contribution-conditioned auxiliary reward allocation as an interpretable approach to improving complementary coverage among parallel policies in discrete state spaces.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of MCC-PGPSE. At each policy update, the shared team-entropy return is combined with auxiliary rewards redistributed by leave-one-policy-out coverage and state-owner specialization. The redistribution preserves total auxiliary reward mass.
Figure 2: Controlled environments: open-field, bottleneck-memory, branching-specialization, and stochastic-loops.
Environment
Type
Evaluation focus
Role
Open-field
Controlled
Basic open-region coverage and implementation stability
Sanity check
Bottleneck-memory
Controlled
Remote coverage through constrained passageways
Primary task
Branching-specialization
Controlled
Complementary exploration across alternative branches
Primary task
Stochastic-loops
Controlled
Robustness under stochastic transition loops
Robustness
PGPSE Room/Maze
Original protocol
Deterministic Room and stochastic Maze with 43 reachable states
Protocol replication
FrozenLake-v1
Public benchmark
Discrete exploration under slippery transitions
Cross-environment validation
Table 3
Figure 3: Bottleneck-memory results across eight seeds. (A,B) Smoothed mean learning curves with standard-error bands and final-window insets. (C,D) Paired seed-level final-window estimates with mean 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4: Branching-specialization results across eight seeds. (A,B) Smoothed mean learning curves with standard-error bands and final-window insets. (C,D) Paired seed-level final-window estimates with mean 95% confidence intervals.
Env.
Variant
Objective
Objective 95% CI
Support
Support 95% CI
BM
Entropy
0.4634
[0.4604, 0.4669]
12.75
[12.60, 12.94]
BM
Count
0.4642
[0.4612, 0.4678]
12.79
[12.63, 12.98]
BM
ICM
0.4638
[0.4610, 0.4671]
12.77
[12.63, 12.95]
BM
RND
0.4633
[0.4605, 0.4668]
12.76
[12.61, 12.94]
BM
Online
0.4668
[0.4638, 0.4707]
12.90
[12.76, 13.11]
BM
Triad
0.4655
[0.4627, 0.4691]
12.84
[12.71, 13.03]
Table 6
Figure 5: Behavioral diagnostics for Entropy, Triad, and MCC-PGPSE in bottleneck-memory (A–C) and branching-specialization (D–F): pairwise overlap, unique-state fraction, and credit-weight standard deviation. Curves show smoothed means with standard-error bands.
Environment / variant
Objective
Support
Pairwise overlap
Unique-state fraction
BM / Triad
0.4656
12.86
0.445
0.108
BM / Specialization-only
0.4682
12.97
0.444
0.108
BM / LOO-only
0.4866
13.83
0.427
0.113
BM / Entropy-marginal
0.4715
13.10
0.441
0.108
BM / MCC-PGPSE
0.4911
14.04
0.423
0.114
BM / MCC-on-entropy
0.5621
18.16
0.352
0.136
Table 8
Figure 6: Credit-alignment controls across eight seeds. Paired MCC-PGPSE-minus-control differences are shown for Objective (A) and Support (B); diamonds and whiskers denote means and bootstrap 95% confidence intervals.
Env.
Variant
Objective
Support
BM
MCC-PGPSE
0.4911
14.04
BM
Static credit
0.4652
12.83
BM
Reversed credit
0.4615
12.66
BM
Triad
0.4656
12.86
BS
MCC-PGPSE
0.5963
20.82
BS
Static credit
0.5898
20.25
Table 10
Env.
Control
Δ Objective
Δ Support
Paired rank-biserial
Holm-adjusted p
BM
Triad
+0.0255
+1.185
1.00 / 1.00
0.0234 / 0.0234
BM
Static credit
+0.0258
+1.214
1.00 / 1.00
0.0234 / 0.0234
BM
Reversed credit
+0.0295
+1.384
1.00 / 1.00
0.0234 / 0.0234
BS
Triad
+0.0064
+0.560
1.00 / 1.00
0.0234 / 0.0234
BS
Static credit
+0.0065
+0.568
1.00 / 1.00
0.0234 / 0.0234
BS
Reversed credit
+0.0079
+0.705
1.00 / 1.00
0.0234 / 0.0234
Table 11
Figure 7: Original-protocol validation. Paired final-window Entropy and MCC-PGPSE results are shown for five seeds in stochastic Maze (A,B) and deterministic Room (C,D); Mean rows include bootstrap 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 8: Stochastic-loops robustness across eight matched seeds. (A,B) Mean learning curves with standard-error bands and final-window insets. (C,D) Paired final-window estimates with mean 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 9: Public-benchmark validation. Paired final-window gains of MCC-PGPSE over Entropy and Triad are shown for Objective (A) and Support (B) across seven tasks; whiskers denote unadjusted bootstrap 95% confidence intervals.
Efficient exploration is a central problem in reinforcement learning and is often formalized as maximizing the entropy of the state-action occupancy measure. While unconstrained maximum-entropy exploration is relatively well understood, real-world exploration is often constrained by safety, resource, or imitation requirements. This constrained setting is particularly challenging because entropy maximization lacks additive structure, rendering Bellman-equation-based methods inapplicable. Moreover, scalable approaches require policy parameterization, inducing non-convexity in both the objective and the constraints. To our knowledge, the only prior model-free policy-gradient approach for this setting under general policy parameterization is due to Ying et al. (2025). Unfortunately, their guarantees are limited to weak regret and ergodic averages, which do not imply that the final output is a single deployable policy that is near-optimal and nearly feasible. In this work we take a different approach to this problem, and propose Policy Gradient Penalty (PGP) method, a single-loop policy-space method that enforces general convex occupancy-measure constraints via quadratic-penalty regularization. PGP constructs pseudo-rewards that yield gradient estimates of the penalized objective, subsequently exploiting the classical Policy Gradient Theorem. We further establish the regularity of the penalized objective, providing the smoothness properties needed to justify the convergence of PGP. Leveraging hidden convexity and strong duality, we then establish global last-iterate convergence guarantees, attaining an ε-optimal constrained entropy value with ε bounded constraint violation despite policy-induced non-convexity. We validate PGP through ablations on a grid-world benchmark and further demonstrate scalability on two challenging continuous-control tasks.
Florian Wolf, Ilyas Fatkhullin, Niao He
The Computing & Mathematical Sciences Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. · Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. · 3ETH AI Center, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Efficient exploration remains a central challenge in reinforcement learning, serving as a useful pretraining objective for data collection, particularly when an external reward function is unavailable. A principled formulation of the exploration problem is to find policies that maximize the entropy of their induced steady-state visitation distribution, thereby encouraging uniform long-run coverage of the state space. Many existing exploration approaches require estimating state visitation frequencies through repeated on-policy rollouts, which can be computationally expensive. In this work, we instead consider an intrinsic average-reward formulation in which the reward is derived from the visitation distribution itself, so that the optimal policy maximizes steady-state entropy. An entropy-regularized version of this objective admits a spectral characterization: the relevant stationary distributions can be computed from the dominant eigenvectors of a problem-dependent transition matrix. This insight leads to a novel algorithm for solving the maximum entropy exploration problem, EVE (EigenVector-based Exploration), which avoids explicit rollouts and distribution estimation, instead computing the solution through iterative updates, similar to a value-based approach. To address the original unregularized objective, we employ a posterior-policy iteration (PPI) approach, which monotonically improves the entropy and converges in value. We prove convergence of EVE under standard assumptions and demonstrate empirically that it efficiently produces policies with high steady-state entropy, achieving competitive exploration performance relative to rollout-based baselines in deterministic grid-world environments.
Jacob Adamczyk, Adam Kamoski, Rahul V. Kulkarni
Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston · NSF Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards improves reasoning, while the allocation of learning signal shapes which solutions remain accessible under repeated sampling. Group-relative objectives assign equal advantages to equally rewarded responses, making aggregate credit proportional to sampled mode frequency. We introduce Exploration-Preserving Policy Optimization (ExPPO), a lightweight advantage-shaping rule that redistributes credit using prompt-relative, length-normalized response surprisal and prompt pass rate. ExPPO combines bounded shaping with shared normalization to preserve verifier polarity and approximately maintain each prompt group's total absolute sequence-advantage mass. Our analysis characterizes response-level credit allocation alongside sampled mode updates, deriving local conditions for gains in entropy and correct-mode discovery. Experiments show improved in-domain and out-of-domain reasoning coverage, higher aggregate response accuracy, and strong coverage at large sampling budgets. A controlled multi-answer evaluation further demonstrates increased correct-mode yield and gains in diversity among verified-correct responses. Code is available at https://github.com/jinhangzhan/ExPPO
Hangzhan jin, Mohammad Hamdaqa, Doina Precup
Mila - Quebec AI Institute · Polytechnique Montr´eal · McGill University +2