DARTS: Decoder-Aware Representation Tuning via Surgery for Model Merging

Speculative decoding losslessly accelerates autoregressive language models by verifying multiple draft tokens in parallel. Diffusion-based drafters further reduce proposal latency by predicting an entire token block in parallel, but their position-wise distributions are marginal rather than conditioned on tokens selected along each draft path. Existing recurrent correction incorporates causal information along a single draft chain, whereas diffusion-based tree construction broadens candidate coverage without carrying this correction along individual branches. We introduce DARTree, a training-free speculative decoding method that extends a pretrained AR correction head from chains to trees. DARTree first constructs a fixed-width candidate tree by expanding and scoring all nodes at each depth in a single batch, and then only applies best-first pruning to select the verification tree, decoupling AR-head inference from sequential heap operations. Across seven math, code, and chat benchmarks, DARTree achieves the highest average acceptance length and speedup in all four model--temperature configurations, accepting up to 12.97 tokens per verification round, 98.6% more than DFlash and 27.9% more than Domino in the same setting, and reaching up to 9.73$\times$ lossless speedup over locally measured autoregressive decoding.

Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to auto-regressive (AR) models, offering greater expressive capacity and potential for parallel generation and faster inference. However, open-source dLLMs remain immature, lagging behind AR models in both efficiency and quality. We identify an underexplored property of dLLMs: token-wise redundancy in bi-directional self-attention. Self-attention activations are highly correlated across tokens, and temporal changes in query representations can predict redundancy in corresponding key, value, and output activations. We introduce DARE, with two complementary mechanisms: DARE-KV, which reuses cached key-value (KV) activations, and DARE-O, which reuses output activations to reduce redundant computation while preserving quality. DARE achieves up to 1.20x per-layer latency reduction and reuses up to 87% of attention activations, with negligible degradation on reasoning and code-generation benchmarks. DARE-KV and DARE-O incur average performance drops of only 2.0% and 1.2%, respectively. Combined with techniques such as prefix caching and Fast-dLLM, DARE provides additive gains without retraining. These results establish token-wise reuse as an effective strategy for improving the efficiency of diffusion-based LLMs while preserving generation fidelity. Code: https://github.com/enyac-group/DARE

Large language models (LLMs) tuned for safety often avoid acknowledging demographic differences, even when such acknowledgment is factually correct (e.g., ancestry-based disease incidence) or contextually justified (e.g., religious hiring preferences). This identity-blindness yields incorrect responses, unnecessary refusals, or generic "equal-treatment" defaults. We study this via difference-awareness classification: given a question involving demographic groups, the task is not to answer directly, but to classify whether a correct answer requires recognizing group differences (yes) or whether groups should be treated identically (no). Crucially, fine-tuning for accuracy triggers harm drift: model-generated explanations become increasingly harmful as decision accuracy improves, whether by elaborating harmful content, introducing problematic assumptions, or failing to flag harms the baseline identified. To mitigate this, we introduce DART (Distill--Audit--Repair Training), which distills label-conditioned reasoning from a teacher, audits outputs for harm drift cases relative to baseline, and repairs problematic cases via severity-weighted fine-tuning. On eight benchmarks, DART improves Llama-3-8B-Instruct accuracy from 39.0% to 68.8%, with largest gains on equal-treatment prompts (11.3% -> 72.6%), while reducing harm drift cases by 72.6%. It also transfers to 280 open-ended real-world queries across medical, legal, policy, and educational domains, improving difference-appropriate responses from 39.8% to 77.5% while reducing refusals from 34.3% to 3.0%. Our results demonstrate that accuracy and safety need not conflict when explicit detection and repair mechanisms are in place.