Organizations: School of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi’an, 710126, China · School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China · Key Laboratory of Collaborative Intelligence Systems, Ministry of Education, Xidian University, Xi’an, 710071, China · Faculty of Infor-X, Xidian University, Xi’an, 710071, China · College of Artificial Intelligence, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, 010022, China
Personalized federated learning (PFL) is a promising paradigm for collaborative learning over distributed devices, where edge nodes collaboratively train personalized models without sharing raw data. Although PFL addresses data heterogeneity by learning client-specific models, it still suffers from substantial uplink and downlink communication costs when exchanging high-dimensional parameters in bandwidth-constrained systems. Recent one-bit methods achieve extreme compression, but they usually rely on a single thresholding rule applied to the whole model. This design has two limitations. First, it overlooks layer-wise differences in parameter distributions and quantization sensitivities. Second, a single threshold provides only coarse binary information and cannot capture fine-grained variations in parameter distributions. To address these issues, we propose a communication-efficient PFL framework via layer-wise multi-threshold random sketching. In the proposed method, each layer is assigned its own set of quantization thresholds, so that the compressed representation can adapt to layer-specific statistics while using multiple intervals to provide a finer low-bit description of sketched parameters. The proposed method supports bidirectional communication using compact low-bit sketches and improves the communication-accuracy tradeoff compared with existing one-bit compression approaches.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Layer-wise parameter distribution evolution in a two-layer DNN trained with standard FedAvg. Subfigures (a)–(c) show the distributions of fc1.weight and fc2.weight at rounds 0, 15, and 99. Subfigure (d) shows the test accuracy over communication rounds, with the three selected rounds marked to indicate the initial, intermediate, and converged stages.
Figure 2: System diagram of the proposed algorithm pFedLMS.
Method ( α=0.5 )
MNIST (Acc. %)
FMNIST (Acc. %)
SVHN (Acc. %)
CIFAR-10 (Acc. %)
CIFAR-100 (Acc. %)
FedAvg
98.55±0.08
92.32±0.81
92.66±0.54
86.57±0.34
61.14±0.58
OBDA
91.12±1.21
83.14±0.54
36.40±3.19
37.91±1.97
26.85±0.26
OBCSAA
93.81±0.28
88.54±0.85
59.28±2.31
61.04±1.57
14.19±2.35
FedProto
96.21±0.21
91.11±0.78
89.62±0.65
79.03±0.53
44.30±1.16
EDEN
98.12±0.11
89.24±2.24
85.08±3.65
79.85±0.37
38.81±1.39
zSignFed
94.98±0.49
86.68±0.67
41.31±1.91
50.83±4.11
41.52±1.51
Table 1: Comparison of maximum test accuracy under the Dirichlet non-IID setting with α=0.5 .
Method ( α=0.1 )
MNIST (Acc. %)
FMNIST (Acc. %)
SVHN (Acc. %)
CIFAR-10 (Acc. %)
CIFAR-100 (Acc. %)
FedAvg
99.19±0.15
97.67±0.79
96.52±0.32
92.62±1.21
74.60±0.99
OBDA
86.84±0.95
77.50±3.96
15.09±4.45
18.12±4.32
21.43±1.48
OBCSAA
96.35±0.89
95.90±1.15
75.09±5.04
78.76±4.35
20.35±3.36
FedProto
98.61±0.23
97.58±0.89
95.32±0.68
91.12±1.26
66.29±0.45
EDEN
98.83±0.20
96.93±0.99
93.19±1.81
88.71±2.85
58.28±1.21
zSignFed
95.63±0.45
82.77±1.40
40.66±1.73
27.59±2.47
30.81±0.78
Table 2: Comparison of maximum test accuracy under the Dirichlet non-IID setting with α=0.1 .
Figure 4: Comparison of test accuracy versus communication rounds for different algorithms under non-IID settings α=0.5 on the CIFAR-10 dataset.
Figure 5: Comparison of communication cost for different algorithms across five datasets.
Figure 6: Comparison of test accuracy against cumulative communication cost among low-communication algorithms on the MNIST dataset.
Method
Multi-threshold
Layer-wise
Acc. (%)
Refined pFed1BS
✗
✗
89.80
pFedLMS ( T=1 )
✗
✓
90.31
only Multi-threshold
✓
✗
91.41
pFedLMS ( T=7 )
✓
✓
91.94
Table 3: Ablation results for layer-wise and multi-threshold designs on different datasets.
Figure 7: Test accuracy of pFedLMS with different quantization thresholds T on the CIFAR-10 dataset.
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
h
1
2
3
5
10
20
50
Accuracy (%)
97.85
97.73
97.57
97.34
97.00
96.61
96.44
Appendix
Table 1: Effect of the sketching operator refresh interval h on MNIST. The best result is shown in bold.
λ
MNIST
FMNIST
SVHN
CIFAR-10
CIFAR-100
0.2
98.25
97.09
95.75
93.60
65.59
0.1
98.54
97.36
95.29
93.65
65.22
0.05
98.65
97.42
95.78
93.56
66.25
0.01
98.83
97.63
95.85
93.43
66.84
0.005
98.85
97.64
94.92
93.21
66.14
Appendix
Table 2: Effect of the regularization parameter λ under α=0.1 and T=7 . The best result in each column is shown in bold.
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, thereby preserving privacy. However, FL often suffers from significant communication and computational overhead, limiting its scalability and sustainability. In this work, we introduce a Full Compression Pipeline (FCP) for FL in communication-constrained environments. FCP integrates three complementary deep compression techniques (pruning, quantization, and Huffman encoding) into a unified end-to-end framework. By compressing local models and communication payloads, FCP substantially reduces transmission costs and resource consumption while maintaining competitive accuracy. To quantify its impact, we develop an evaluation framework that captures both communication and computation overheads as a unified model cost, allowing a holistic assessment of efficiency trade-offs. The pipeline is evaluated in an independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID data setting. In one representative scenario, training a ResNet-12 model on the CIFAR-10 dataset with ten clients and a 2 Mbps bandwidth, the FCP achieves more than 11× reduction in model size, with only a 2% drop in accuracy compared to the uncompressed baseline. This results in an FL training that is more than 60% faster.
Elouan Colybes, Shirin Salehi, Anke Schmeink
Chair of Information Theory and Data Analytics (INDA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Federated Learning (FL) faces challenges from client data heterogeneity and resource-constrained mobile devices, which can degrade model accuracy. Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) addresses this issue by adapting shared global knowledge to local data distributions. A promising approach in PFL is model decoupling, which separates the model into global and personalized parameters, raising the key question of which parameters should be personalized to balance global knowledge sharing and local adaptation. In this paper, we propose a Federated Optimal Brain Personalization (FedOBP) algorithm with a quantile-based thresholding mechanism and introduce an element-wise importance score. This score extends Optimal Brain Damage (OBD) pruning theory by incorporating a federated approximation of the first-order derivative in the Taylor expansion to evaluate the importance of each parameter for personalization. Moreover, we move the metric computation originally performed on clients to the server side, to alleviate the burden on resource-constrained mobile devices. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to bridge classical saliency-based pruning theory with federated parameter decoupling, providing a rigorous theoretical justification for selecting personalized parameters based on their sensitivity to local loss landscapes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedOBP outperforms state-of-the-art methods across diverse datasets and heterogeneity scenarios, while requiring personalization of only a very small number of personalized parameters.
Xingyan Chen, Tian Du, Changqiao Xu +4
Beijing Key Laboratory of MEMS Technology and Device Reliability for Industrial Internet, the School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, P. R. China · School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, P. R. China · Institute of Artificial Intelligence and the School of Computer Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China, and with the SKLSDE +3
Federated Learning (FL) has gained significant attention in distributed machine learning by enabling collaborative model training across decentralized system while preserving data privacy. Although extensive research has addressed statistical data heterogeneity, FL still faces several challenges, including high communication and computation overheads and severe device heterogeneity, which require further investigation. Prior work has addressed these issues through sub-model training and partial parameter training. However, such methods often suffer from inconsistent parameter distributions across clients, inaccurate global loss estimation, and increased bias and variance. Guided by our empirical analysis, we propose FedPLT (Federated Learning with Partial Layer Training), an innovative and structured partial parameter training approach that exhibits training behavior similar to full model training while assigning client-specific portions of the model according to their communication and computational capabilities. In addition, we evaluate the performance of FedPLT when combined with optimal client sampling under communication constraints. We show that this integration improves FL performance by reducing sampling variance under the same communication budget. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that FedPLT achieves performance comparable to, or even surpassing, that of full-model training (i.e., FedAvg), while requiring significantly fewer trainable parameters per client. Moreover, FedPLT outperforms existing methods in highly heterogeneous environments, effectively adapts to client resource constraints, and reduces the number of straggling clients. In particular, FedPLT reduces the number of trainable parameters by 71%-82% while achieving performance on par with full-model training.
Ahmad Dabaja, Rachid El-Azouzi
Laboratoire Informatique d’Avignon (LIA), Avignon University, France