Connectome-to-Function: Conditional Generative Latent Representations for Reservoir Computing

The aim of this work is to examine the connectomes of Caenorhabditis elegans through a computational lens using the reservoir computing framework. Connectomes are mappings of biological neural networks; C. elegans is the first organism for which physical connectomes covering the whole nervous system have been published. The connectomes of C. elegans used in this paper have been derived at different ages of the organism and are based on three different ways of measuring inter-cellular connections. They have, with minimal preprocessing, been implemented as reservoirs in the form of echo state networks, which are recurrent neural networks. In reservoir computing, the reservoir itself is not trained, rather the output of the reservoir is passed to a comparatively small read-out module in which training takes place. Training and testing is conducted in different neuro-inspired tasks, with the aim of using these tasks as a benchmark for the connectomes. This process has been repeated with different configurations of the reservoir and equally sized but randomized null models have been used for comparison. The results show that the biological wiring and a bio-informed configuration of input and output nodes of the reservoirs do not necessarily lead to better performance. Contrarily, the randomized null models are often outperforming the original connectomes on the chosen benchmarks. At the same time it becomes clear that the results depend a lot on the configuration of the reservoir and the way the connectome has been derived from the organism. Connectomes from different ages may produce varying outcome, without a clear trend becoming visible.

Understanding how the architecture of neural networks shapes the computations they carry is a central challenge in neuroscience and machine learning. While specific circuit architectures have been linked to particular network computations and theoretical bounds on expressivity of broad classes of networks have been found, we are still missing general principles connecting the structure of finite networks to their computational capabilities. Here, we characterize the computational abilities of recurrent neural networks as a function of their connectivity by training a large collection of different networks to compute a large set of Boolean functions. For small networks, we constructed the complete ``catalogs'' of network-function performance, which revealed that computational capacity varies widely across architectures and that most networks show poor performance, and most functions are hard to compute. However, we show that having local 2- and 3-cycles in a network strongly enhances its computational ability, and networks with such cycles are often the minimal architectures that can solve particular functions. We further show that a small set of structural statistics accurately predict networks' performance. Extending our analysis to large networks showed that typical networks fail even to approximate a randomly selected function. Surprisingly, adding a small number of sparsely connected biologically-inspired interneurons to the network dramatically increases computational capacity. As in small networks, adding short cycles improved networks' capacity, outperforming acyclic or reachability-matched controls. Thus, our results identify local cycles as design principles linking neural connectivity to computational power, and offer a general framework to explore structure-function relations in computing networks.

Reservoir computing exploits the fixed dynamics of a recurrent network for temporal processing, requiring only a trained linear readout. Biological neural connectomes, shaped by millions of years of evolution, may encode computational structure beyond what random reservoirs provide, yet whether that structure can be further enhanced by principled optimisation remains an open question. We address it by applying four gradient-free, bio-inspired optimisers (Particle Swarm Optimisation, Differential Evolution, Grey Wolf Optimiser, and Whale Optimisation Algorithm) to the edge weights of connectome-based echo-state networks across six species spanning six orders of magnitude in neural complexity: C. elegans (279 neurons), Drosophila (49 nodes), mouse (112), rat (73), macaque (29 regions, continuous FLNe synaptic strengths), and human structural MRI connectivity (83 parcels). Each connectome is evaluated on four canonical reservoir computing benchmarks: Memory Capacity (MC), Lorenz attractor prediction, NARMA-10 system identification, and Mackey-Glass chaotic time-series prediction. All four optimisers consistently outperform unoptimised biological baselines across every task and species when initialised from biological weights. WOA achieves the largest gains on every task: up to a 17x MC improvement (C. elegans: 1.39 to 23.91) and up to 89% NRMSE reduction (Mackey-Glass, human), corresponding to an average 214% improvement across all species and tasks. Crucially, random initialisation on the same topology reliably underperforms biology, establishing biological weight values as an essential inductive bias that topology alone cannot recover. These results position bio-inspired, biologically-initialised optimisation as a principled and broadly effective strategy for connectome reservoir computing across the animal kingdom.