Photonic reservoir computing with dimensionally compressed readout

Reservoir computers benefit from the inherent complexity of optical phenomena, which provide rich, often nonlinear dynamics. However, training directly on the reservoir's output renders the system prone to overfitting and computationally inefficient during the training phase. In this work, we investigate strategies to mitigate overfitting and reduce computational overhead through output pruning and regularization. We compare loss-minimizing search methods (Equal Search and Branch and Bound) against an output-oriented statistical filtering approach (Variance Filter) and random pruning, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of each approach and the overall importance of informed reservoir output sampling, particularly for a shrinking latent space. We further demonstrate that enforcing readout selection across the full output spectrum improves performance, especially for non-iterative methods. Additionally, we examine L1 and L2 regularization techniques (LASSO and ridge regression), both of which significantly enhance performance on highly nonlinear tasks such as the Spiral Benchmark. While our methods are of general use, results are obtained from and discussed exemplarily for a nonlinear fiber-optical extreme learning machine. Overall, this study provides a deep analysis of the reservoirs' hidden-layer filtering mechanisms and the output-layer training, enabling optimized performance in physical reservoir computing systems.

Reservoir computing exploits nonlinear dynamical systems to encode temporal inputs into high-dimensional state space representations. Although reservoir performance is often characterized through memory, nonlinearity, and their tradeoff, such aggregate measures do not reveal how task-relevant information is organized within the state space. Here, we introduce an eigen-spectral decomposition framework linking the degree-wise information processing capacity to the corresponding state space modes. As a result, we are able to quantify the degree-wise representation energy, and show that in some cases, substantial amounts of information processing capacity may reside in low-energy modes that are vulnerable to experimental noise. These results suggest that useful reservoir computation depends not only on dimensionality expansion, but also on the geometric organization of task-relevant information, with direct implications on physical reservoir computers.

Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses the dynamics of a fixed or weakly tuned quantum system to transform temporal and sequential inputs into measured features, while training is typically confined to a classical readout. This separation reduces reliance on repeated quantum parameter updates and avoids the barren plateaus associated with variational circuit training. Its computational power is often attributed to the exponentially large Hilbert space of the quantum system. However, the memory, nonlinearity, and expressivity that determine what a reservoir can actually compute depend jointly on the input encoding, quantum evolution, observables, measurement, and readout, not on Hilbert space dimension alone. On hardware, these capabilities are further constrained by finite sampling, hardware noise, measurement backaction, and the cost of estimating observables, so a large state space alone does not guarantee useful computation. In this survey, we develop a common system model that connects these components and use it to organize QRC foundations, computational properties, reservoir architectures, operating protocols, and physical implementations. We examine spin, photonic, superconducting, bosonic, neutral atom, and other analog platforms, together with applications, software and high performance computing support, benchmarking, and reproducibility. The analysis distinguishes hardware demonstrations from simulations and identifies the assumptions and resources that govern comparisons across implementations. Current results do not establish a broad quantum advantage over well matched classical reservoirs. We therefore specify the resource accounting, benchmark standards, and theoretical criteria needed to evaluate claims of quantum advantage.