Reasoning Beyond Transcription: Audio Language Models on Child Stuttering Speech

Audio language models (ALMs) are increasingly used for speech-based understanding, yet their ability to perform semantic reasoning beyond transcription, Text-to-Audio Retrieval, Captioning, and Question-Answering accuracy remains insufficiently benchmarked. In particular, the effects of accent variation, domain shift, and semantic over-inference on audio reasoning are poorly understood. We evaluate audio language models across five semantic and paralinguistic reasoning tasks: entailment, consistency, plausibility, accent drift, and accent restraint. Collectively, these tasks assess a model's ability to reason over spoken audio as the primary evidence source, including whether a textual hypothesis can be inferred, contradicted, or left undetermined by the audio, whether statements align or conflict with spoken content, whether claims are plausible given the discourse, and whether model predictions remain stable or appropriately constrained across accent variation. These findings highlight critical limitations in current audio reasoning evaluations and hope to provide guidance for more robust and equitable ALM design and assessment

Current speech translation systems, including SpeechLLMs, are trained on cleaned text and tend to strip disfluencies like filled pauses and false starts rather than translate them. We show this comes at a cost: disfluencies carry meaning that gets lost when speech is cleaned up. To study this systematically, we introduce Uh-Mazing, a benchmark of human-translated, disfluency-annotated Switchboard speech covering English into eight target languages. Across these languages and several architectures, we find that false starts and self-repairs, not filled pauses or discourse markers, drive most of the translation-quality loss, and that models which fail to preserve a disfluency tend to omit it rather than mistranslate it. We show inference-time decoding can mitigate this without retraining, and release the benchmark and code.

Audio-based stuttering systems to date have been trained for detection -- what disfluency is present now -- leaving prediction, the capability needed for closed-loop intervention, unstudied at deployable scale. We train a 616K-parameter CNN on SEP-28k (Apple, 20,131 three-second clips) to predict whether the next contiguous clip contains any disfluency. (1) Severity-selective precursor signal: on the episode-grouped test set, aggregate preblock AUC is modest (0.581 [0.542, 0.619]), but stratifying by upcoming event type reveals concentration on clinically severe events -- blocks 0.601 [0.554, 0.651] and sound repetitions 0.617 [0.567, 0.667] both exclude chance, while fillers (0.45) and word repetitions (0.49) are at chance. The aggregate objective converges to a severity-selective predictor because severe events carry prosodic precursors; fillers do not. (2) Cross-population transfer: without fine-tuning, the same checkpoint applied to 1,024 pediatric Children-Who-Stutter utterances (FluencyBank Teaching) attains AUC 0.674 detection and 0.655 prediction; DisfluencySpeech and LibriStutter reach 0.58-0.60 AUC. (3) Deployable on-device: lossless export to CoreML (1.19 MB), ONNX (40 KB), TFLite. Neural-Engine latency per 3 s window: 0.25 ms (iPhone 17 Pro Max, A19 Pro) to 0.55 ms (iPhone SE 3rd-gen and M1 Max). A 4 Hz streaming simulation uses 0.54% of the real-time budget. Platt-calibrated outputs (test ECE 0.010, from 0.177 raw). Five negative ablations -- output-level Future-Guided Learning, multi-clip GRU, time-axis concatenation, asymmetric focal loss, direct block-targeted training -- none improved over the vanilla baseline.