MOONWALK: Mediating Operations with Intent-Evidence-Action Alignment Across Junior-Supervisor Review Workflows in Animation/VFX Pre-Production

In bespoke art commissions, laypeople know what they feel but lack the words to specify it: one participant wanted a laid-off truck driver depicted as "a ghost in his own machine" but left the medium, scale, and palette unsaid. We frame this as an articulation bottleneck at an under-served upstream stage: requirement discovery, which precedes any artist or image generator and forces the commissioner to constitute intent in the first place. We present MAIA (Multi-Agent Intent Articulation), a multi-agent system that scaffolds this stage through Socratic inquiry under a "Verification over Invention" rule, turning vague affect into a text-only brief of visual terms the user verifies. In a within-subjects study (N = 16), the full configuration produced a large, significant gain in Cognitive Support over a minimal baseline (r = 0.96, p_FDR = 0.015; LMM p_FDR < 0.001). Thematic analysis traces the same mechanism, and a validator gate structurally blocks unratified content. A complementary blind review by three professional concept artists on a sampled set of briefs corroborates this improvement from the artist's side: AI rewriting improved visual completeness and executability in all eight sampled tasks (task-level Wilcoxon p = 0.008; FDR q = 0.010), with directionally larger gains under MAIA than under the baseline (underpowered, d = 1.4-2.6).

Between a screenplay and a film sits a planning problem that is spatial first: who stands where, and what a camera sees from where it stands. An image diffusion model asked for a shot in free text settles that plan by its own defaults. We present PACE (Precise AI Cinematic Expression), a typed representation for the plan: the screenplay evidence, the characters, props and locations it needs, where each subject stands, and what the camera does. A value is written once at the level it belongs to (script, scene, shot or panel) and inherited below it. A compiler turns the result into both the prompt sent to the diffusion model and a 3D scene built in metres, and a camera solver places the camera so that the declared framing is the framing built. Where a declared value becomes geometry, PACE measures, field by field, how far the compiled camera and the staged render sit from the declaration, rather than asking a model to judge. On the 11-scene Automatic Drive screenplay, every staged single-subject panel places its subject within 1.2% of frame width of its declared position; with two or three subjects one camera pose cannot satisfy every position, and the residual is reported rather than absorbed. On 204 external director-storyboard shots, delivered head height is 1.906 times the staged target from the director's words, 1.733 from the compiled prompt, and 0.955 with the greybox control; the condition that holds framing best draws the described action least. Declaring the pose on 30 shots raises the action drawn from 58.9% to 74.4% without moving the framing. Transitions, fitted motion and human review of the generated panels remain open. Code: https://github.com/StudioPiLabs/pace-core

Films communicate through deliberate creative choices, including lighting, color, composition, editing, dialogue, music, and sound. Humans naturally interpret these signals as directorial intent, yet current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are evaluated almost exclusively on understanding what happens rather than why it is presented that way. We introduce TAKE 85, the first benchmark for directorial-intent understanding, comprising 398 short films (85 hours) with expert-verified question-answer pairs spanning global and fine-grained visual and audio intent. Through controlled modality ablations, TAKE 85 enables systematic evaluation of multimodal reasoning. Experiments on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal a substantial gap between perceptual recognition and intentional understanding: while models accurately describe events and narratives, they consistently fail to infer the communicative role of filmmaking decisions. Our results establish directorial intent as a previously overlooked dimension of multimodal understanding: even the strongest model reaches only 58 out of 100, and our ablations show that no input modality is sufficient on its own. All code, Q&As, and models are publicly available from https://github.com/KaiShinozakiConefrey/Take-85