Adaptive Margin Ordinal Loss: Penalizing Center-Class Hedging in Ordinal Classification

Manisha Kandel

cs.LGSep 12, 2026

Adaptive Margin Ordinal Loss: Penalizing Center-Class Hedging in Ordinal Classification

Authors: Manisha Kandel

Abstract

Standard cross-entropy loss causes neural networks trained on ordinal classification tasks to hedge predictions toward center classes, a failure mode we term \emph{center-class hedging}. This occurs because predicting the middle class minimizes expected symmetric loss, making it the path of least resistance regardless of the true label. Existing ordinal losses address related problems such as large-error penalization and rank consistency, but none directly suppresses center-class hedging as a function of where the true label lies relative to the ordinal center. We propose the Adaptive Margin Ordinal Loss (AMOL), a multiplicative weight applied to per-class loss terms of the form $m(k,y) = 1 + \alpha \cdot (1 - |k-c|/c) \cdot (|y-c|/c)$ , where $c$ is the center class, $k$ is the candidate class, and $y$ is the true label. The weight encodes a joint condition: it is large only when the candidate class is near center and the true label is far from center, collapsing to standard behavior otherwise. We further introduce the Center-Hedging Rate (CHR) as a diagnostic metric that directly quantifies this failure mode. Across four ordinal classification benchmarks and five random seeds, AMOL achieves the best or tied-best Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) on all four datasets compared to cross-entropy, OLL, and SORD baselines. An asymmetric variant (AMOL-asym) eliminates center-class hedging entirely on the Abalone dataset ( $\text{CHR} = 0.000 \pm 0.000$ across all five seeds, $n \approx 266$ extreme-class test samples per run), compared to $0.074 \pm 0.005$ for standard cross-entropy.

Explore similar work

Jun 24, 2026cs.LG

Deep Neural Networks with Ordinal Loss for Medical Applications

In many prediction problems in medical applications, target labels exhibit an inherent ordinal structure, where class ordering reflects clinically meaningful severity levels. The cost associated with misclassification is often non-uniform and asymmetric, as errors between distant ordinal categories may have substantially more severe consequences than errors between adjacent ones, and overestimating disease severity may have different clinical implications than underestimating it. Traditional loss functions such as multi-class cross-entropy treat all misclassifications equally and fail to incorporate this ordering information. Recent advances in ordinal regression aim to address this limitation by integrating rank-based structures into deep learning models. In this work, we introduce the \textbf{Ordinal Cross-Entropy (OCE)} framework, a general and architecture-independent approach for learning from ordinal data. The proposed method extends the standard cross-entropy formulation to account for misclassification severity through an ordinal cost matrix while preserving the probabilistic interpretation and optimization benefits of the conventional loss. We provide a theoretical analysis of the OCE gradient behavior and show that it yields smoother optimization dynamics and improved ordinal consistency. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that our method achieves lower prediction error costs and better calibration compared to existing state-of-the-art ordinal approaches, establishing OCE as a simple yet effective solution for ordinal regression in deep neural networks.

Tal Dvora, Rotem Haba, Gonen Singer

Cross-Entropy Losses Severity Deep Learning Models Regression Deep Neural Network Medical Domain

Ask PDF

Jul 23, 2026cs.LG

ADABORD: a novel AdaBoost approach for ordinal classification

Ordinal Classification (OC) deals with classification tasks where the classes follow a natural order. Despite the progress in OC, many existing approaches fail to fully leverage the ordinal information, treating the problem as nominal classification and thereby losing performance potential. In this work, ADABORD, an AdaBoost framework specifically designed for ordinal classification problems, is introduced. The ordinal nature of the classes is incorporated into two key components of the well-known AdaBoost algorithm: 1) the base estimator, where decision trees with the ordinal Gini splitting criterion are proposed; 2) the error function used to update sample weights at each stage and the weights of the classifier in the final ensemble model, given by the absolute ranked probability score, a measure that accounts for both the ordering and the distance between classes. ADABORD is extensively compared against seven state-of-the-art methods on the TOC-UCO repository, the largest benchmark collection for OC to date. The experimental results, supported by statistical analysis, show that ADABORD significantly outperforms competing methods, particularly on datasets with five or more classes, where the ordinal structure becomes more pronounced. Source code, along with all experimental protocols, is publicly available to ensure reproducibility and facilitate future research in OC.

Rafael Ayllón-Gavilán, Francisco José Martínez-Estudillo, David Guijo-Rubio +2

Gradient Boosted Tree Split Learning

Ask PDF

Aug 9, 2026cs.CL

Are LLMs Positionally Consistent Ordinal Classifiers? A Systematic Evaluation

Large language models are increasingly used for ordinal classification, yet semantically equivalent changes to prompt organization can alter their predictions. We conduct systematic experiments to characterize positional bias from label order, demonstration order, and demonstration placement. First, we apply the three probes to ten frontier LLMs on a common ordinal-classification task; every model is sensitive to all three positional sources, showing that the problem is pervasive. Second, we vary eight prompt-, task-, and model-level factors across five datasets; accuracy and stability are often misaligned, and only lower scale cardinality consistently improves both. Third, we compare pointwise, pairwise, and listwise inference, alternative aggregation and debiasing methods, and joint configurations; the tested corrections do not provide a reliable remedy, while a comparison-based listwise formulation offers the best balance but transfers unevenly across models and bias sources. These findings show that positional robustness depends on the full system configuration rather than the model alone. Ordinal-classification systems should therefore be selected jointly for predictive performance and stability.

Yu Wang, Zhe Zhou, Menglin Liu +1

Bias Detection and Mitigation Order Matters Position

Ask PDF