EBL: Efficient Broad Learning for Distributed Adaptive Harmonic Analysis

The increasing integration of Electric Vehicles (EVs) has imposed a growing harmonic challenge on the power grid. For AC/DC Power Factor Correction (PFC) in single-phase On-Board Chargers (OBCs), Model Predictive Current Control (MPCC) improves the current quality by predicting and tracking the inductor current. However, finite control set MPCC selects switching states, resulting in discrete control actions and a limited optimisation space. Moreover, the MPCC cost function based on instantaneous current tracking error has limited capability to compensate for low-order harmonic disturbances induced by dead time, control delay, and model parameter mismatch. This paper proposes a duty cycle predictive MPCC incorporating a real-time harmonic estimation reference. The proposed method dynamically estimates the low-order harmonic components of the input current and corrects the MPCC reference current, enabling continuous duty cycle control and targeted suppression of dominant low-order harmonics. Simulation results on a single-phase OBC demonstrate that the proposed duty cycle predictive MPCC reduces the steady-state current THD_i from 11.47% to 6.10% compared with the switching state predictive MPCC. With the harmonic reference, the THD_i is further reduced to 2.85%.

Accurate forecasting of electric vehicle (EV) charging demand is critical for grid stability, infrastructure planning, and real-time charging optimization. In this work, we study the problem of early prediction of charging demand, where the total energy of a session is estimated using only information available at plug-in time and during the first minutes of charging. This enables actionable decisions while the session is still in progress, which is of direct importance for EV network operators. We construct a session-level dataset from the Adaptive Charging Network (ACN), combining session metadata with early-window charging measurements, and derive tabular features capturing user intent, temporal patterns, and initial charging behavior. We focus on a single operational depot, Caltech, and model intra-depot heterogeneity through station-level client partitions while evaluating multiple model families in a federated learning (FL) setting. Our results show that federated models can approach centralized predictive performance while keeping data in-depot, enabling privacy-enhanced training across distributed charging infrastructures. Overall, we demonstrate that reliable demand estimates can be obtained early in the session with minimal data, and that FL provides a practical pathway toward scalable and privacy-aware analytics for EV charging networks. Code is available at https://github.com/Indigma-Innovations/federated-learning-ev-charging-demand.

The recent growth of EV adoption poses challenges for power systems, including increased peak demand and potential grid instability. Smart control of EV charging -- e.g., based on reinforcement learning (RL) -- can alleviate these issues by learning temporal and contextual patterns from historical data. Yet, in real-world scenarios, key features, such as departure time, often are unavailable. This, in turn, makes it harder for an RL agent to learn and execute an effective charging policy. To mitigate this uncertainty, a trained forecaster can approximate the unknown features from available data. However, since these forecasting models are typically trained for accuracy (rather than their impact on a downstream agent's decision quality), their errors may propagate and hinder the overall performance of a controller that is using the forecasts. To avoid this, we propose a decision-focused RL (DF-RL) framework in which the forecaster is trained end-to-end, i.e., with feedback from the charging policy actions taken by the RL agent. Such joint training of both the forecaster and controller ultimately results in higher-quality actions: our proposed DF-RL method yields superior charging decisions compared to other baselines, achieving up to a 14% improvement in total reward and a 55% reduction of unsupplied energy (i.e., charging that failed to happen because the EV already left), relative to the RL method without departure time forecasting.