cs.ROSep 15, 2026

The Robot Data Factory

Authors: Sami Haddadin, Ivan Laptev, Ian Reid, Dezhen Song, Cesare Stefanini, Abdalla Swikir, Xingxing Zuo, Lyes Saad Saoud, +13 more

Abstract

Physical AI requires more than increasingly large robot datasets: intelligent robots acquire knowledge through continuous interaction with the physical world. We argue that the defining scientific resource of Physical AI is therefore not raw robot data alone, but robot experience - physically grounded interaction whose observations, actions, embodiment, context, and outcomes preserve the perception-action-consequence loop. We introduce the Robot Data Factory (RDF), a mission-driven infrastructure and methodology for continuously generating, validating, benchmarking, and reusing such experience. RDF organizes heterogeneous robots and environment-specific training grounds through reproducible missions, skill curricula, synchronized multimodal sensing, external ground truth, an agentic robot network, data pipelines, and living benchmarks. Rather than treating datasets as static end products, RDF implements a closed Deploy-Measure-Learn-Repeat cycle in which validated physical experience supports world models, vision-language-action models, embodied policies, digital twins, and subsequent robot deployment. We further formalize robot experience and its quality, introduce a mission-task-skill-episode-dataset-benchmark-capability hierarchy, and derive quantitative scaling laws and an algorithmic synthesis procedure connecting robot fleet size, sensor rates, storage, learning representations, tokenization, training compute, inference, and latency to Embodied-AI cluster requirements. The framework is instantiated in three complementary physical training grounds for domestic, environmental, and energy applications. RDF thus reframes robot data generation as a continuous scientific production process and provides a pathway toward reproducible, scalable, and eventually federated infrastructure for Physical AI.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jun 18, 2026cs.RO

Data Standards for Humanoid Robotics: The Missing Infrastructure for Physical AI

The scalability of humanoid robots will depend not only on models and hardware, but also on whether physical experience can accumulate across robots, tasks, organizations, and time. Drawing on the authors' work in developing ISO/WD 26264-1, Humanoid robot datasets -- Part 1: General requirements, within ISO/TC 299/WG 16, this article argues that data standards are becoming foundational infrastructure for Physical AI. We develop three insights. First, humanoid robot data is embodied interaction data, not a collection of isolated digital samples; a useful dataset must preserve the relationship among robot body, action, task, scene, execution trace, and outcome. Second, its value depends on physical coherence: multimodal streams are reusable only when timing, coordinate frames, calibration, kinematics, units, and synchronization assumptions remain inspectable. Third, the main bottleneck is not only data scarcity, but non-cumulative data caused by high collection costs, data silos, and inconsistent evaluation. We argue that humanoid robot data standards address these bottlenecks by making embodied experience interpretable, shareable, traceable, and reusable. A general standard should provide horizontal infrastructure for lifecycle management, metadata, provenance, quality, versioning, and traceability, while capability-specific parts should define domain grammar for manipulation, locomotion, human-robot interaction, cognition, and future humanoid capabilities. As AI moves from screens into bodies, data standards must evolve from organizing digital information to structuring physical interaction.
Shaoshan Liu, Xiugong Qin, Xuan Wu +4
Robotic Data AcquisitionHumanoid RobotsHuman-Robot InteractionStandardsArtificial Intelligence SystemsProvenance
AskPDF
Jun 15, 2026cs.RO

JoyAI-Sim: A Simulation-Enabled Interconversion Toolchain for the Embodied Data Pyramid

Generalist robot policies require trustworthy evaluation and robot-usable training data, but both are difficult to scale with physical robots alone. Real-robot trials and demonstrations remain the most faithful source of deployment signals, yet they are slow, costly, and hard to reproduce. We present JoyAI-Sim, a simulation-enabled interconversion toolchain for human-robot aligned model evaluation and data generation, denoted as Robot ⇌\rightleftharpoons Simulation ⇌\rightleftharpoons Human. On the one hand, the Robot →\rightarrow Simulation →\rightarrow Human pathway supports human-robot aligned model evaluation by reconstructing real-robot tabletop organization tasks as calibrated digital twins for scalable evaluation, while using human embodied feedback to inspect and refine the naturalness of simulated motions. On the other hand, the Human →\rightarrow Simulation →\rightarrow Robot pathway supports human-robot aligned data generation: it lifts ego-centric human demonstrations into simulation, checks them under robot physical constraints, and converts them into robot-centered trajectories, annotations, and visual observations. Together, these pathways use the JoySim simulator as both a scalable evaluation layer and a physical consistency filter for robot data generation. We further package the core reconstruction, simulation, rendering, and realism-augmentation modules as cloud services on JD Cloud, turning the system into a reusable and scalable infrastructure for robot data generation and model evaluation.
Peidong Liu, Yongce Liu, Songyan Guo +34
Robotic Data AcquisitionReal-Robot Experiments
AskPDF
Jul 27, 2026cs.RO

Data Pyramid for Embodied Manipulation: A Survey

Multimodal foundation models learned to see and to speak by consuming the whole internet. Embodied agents admit no such shortcut, since they require data that couple observations with physical states and actions. These signals can be provided, to varying degrees, by multiple data sources. In this work, we organize the embodied data ecosystem as a "pyramid" spanning five complementary sources: real-robot data, UMI-style data, egocentric and exocentric data, simulation data, and general vision-language data. We organize the pyramid around the tension between scalability and robot alignment, and further characterize each source in terms of data quality, diversity, reusability, and physical fidelity. We then analyze recent embodied foundation models through the lens of their data recipes, examining how different sources are selected, aligned, and mixed during pretraining. For embodied brain models, vision-language-action models, and world-action models alike, we relate data composition to capabilities in perception, reasoning, planning, action generation, and world prediction. We close by discussing six open challenges: building large-scale tactile datasets, collecting failure and recovery data, developing scalable data-collection pipelines, aligning actions across embodiments, leveraging egocentric data for dexterous manipulation, and designing principled data recipes for robot learning. We hope this work paves the foundation for the design of next-generation embodied systems.
Yifan Ye, Yankai Fu, Yaoxu Lv +26
Robotic Data AcquisitionData EngineMultimodal Foundation ModelVision-Language-ActionTactile SensingSurvey
AskPDF