Abstract
To train handwritten text recognition systems we need word images and their corresponding transcriptions, and these transcriptions are produced manually. For a script that can be read by only a small number of specialists, this manual transcription is a limitation, because the trained models are supposed to save the time of those same specialists. A relevant question therefore arises: how many transcriptions are needed before a recogniser becomes useful, and how much of that cost can pretraining remove? In this study the answer is measured directly for handwritten Devanagari. We keep the recogniser, optimiser and evaluation protocol the same and change only the number of real transcribed words used for fine-tuning across nine budgets from 10 to 4,000 and four initialisation regimes, with six seeds at every point. The resulting curves are then converted into annotation-equivalent terms. A CER of 0.50 is reached by supervised synthetic pretraining using only 81 transcribed words, whereas random initialisation requires 355, which gives a label multiplier of 4.40 [3.56, 4.99]. There is a zero-shot reference point as well: with no real transcribed words at all, this pretraining is worth about 136 of them. This advantage gets smaller as the target accuracy improves, and at the most demanding target we measure, it cannot be distinguished from no saving at all. A fourth arm in which only the encoder is transferred separates the effect of the pretraining method from that of transfer scope, and masked image modelling is observed to transfer negatively over a bounded range of budgets. We emphasise that the scarcity in this study is constructed by subsampling a large corpus.
Explore similar work
Jul 15, 2026cs.CV
We built a compact convolutional network (1.11 M parameters) for 46-class DHCD Devanagari recognition and reached 99.73%, the highest reported at 15.6x smaller than prior state-of-the-art. We have effectively reached the saturation point: every model tested, large teacher ensembles included, hits the same 11-error intrinsic floor. No configuration achieves a statistically clear win under exact McNemar tests with Wilson confidence intervals. Even without knowledge distillation, our student matches the nearest large-model baseline (17.32 M parameters; McNemar
p=0.345). Outside of DHCD, zero-shot on CMATERdb digits gives 76.6% and fine-tuning reaches 97.8%; corruption robustness is also far better than large baselines (mean corruption accuracy 75.7% vs. 38.7%). All artifacts are at https://github.com/Ampixa/barnamala.
Ashish Thapa, Samrat Karki
Aug 26, 2026cs.CL
Multilingual language models transfer knowledge across languages through shared subword vocabulary, a mechanism that breaks down when related languages use different writing systems. Prior work addresses this via script equalization (romanization or IPA transcription), but direct comparisons are rare; the focus has been on encoder-only models, with most work adapting existing pretrained models. We systematically compare different input representations in autoregressive multilingual pretraining, comparing orthographic text, IPA, and romanization in a controlled setup across three scales (467M, 709M, and 1.03B) on eight languages in four typologically motivated pairs. Across a wide range of downstream tasks on seen and unseen languages, romanized pretraining yields the strongest cross-lingual transfer, and the advantage over text widens with scale. IPA improves over text in most settings but trails romanization. Surprisingly, finetuning a text-pretrained model on romanized data hurts performance on languages already covered by the base model, only marginally helping when the model lacks script coverage. Our results indicate that for multilingual models spanning typologically diverse scripts, to obtain maximum benefits, romanization should be treated as a core design choice applied at pretraining rather than a post hoc fix.
Muge Zhang, Aaron Jencks, Krishna Badikela +2
Sep 14, 2026cs.CV
Handwritten text recognition resources are often small and distributed across collections that differ in language, script, document structure, and annotation format, making joint page-level training difficult. We propose ExpertHTR, a unified vision-language framework that addresses this problem through complementary supervision and conditional model capacity. Structural annotations from heterogeneous datasets are first organized through a common Page-Region-Line representation and used to construct four related training tasks for complete transcription, physical-line coverage, text localization, and localized recognition, without requiring additional manual labels. Building on a jointly trained dense model, ExpertHTR introduces a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with an always-active shared branch and conditionally routed full-MLP experts. Sparsegen allows the number of active routed experts to vary with the hidden representation, while routing regularization reduces persistent concentration on a small subset of experts. Experiments on seven heterogeneous handwriting benchmarks show that complementary supervision consistently improves training with page transcription alone, while joint multi-source training provides further gains on most datasets. The proposed sparse expert model further improves the dense baseline on six of the seven sources. The final unified model also substantially outperforms the evaluated general-purpose OCR and vision-language systems on most benchmarks and achieves state-of-the-art performance on the IAM paragraph-level benchmark, while specialized HTR systems remain stronger on several challenging collections.
Dang Hoai Nam, Nguyen Duy Hieu, Quang Huu Hieu +1