True machine intelligence requires transcending passive pixel registration to master top-down functional reasoning over absent information via visual negation understanding. However, unconstrained visual negation paradigms remain overly open-ended, and pervasive affirmation bias causes both existing Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and evaluation metrics to fail under negative semantics. To solve these intertwined challenges systematically, we first anchor the boundaries of negation reasoning within specific cognitive goals. Specifically, by focusing on safety as a highly pragmatic and critical cognitive dimension, we define the task of \textbf{S}cene \textbf{N}egation \textbf{U}nderstanding under \textbf{S}afety Cognition (\textbf{SNUS}). Under this framework, we construct a high-fidelity negative caption dataset mapping dense assertions of localized hazards. Concurrently, we propose the Cognitive Expected Scene Graph (CESG) Score, a structure-grounded, polarity-aware evaluation metric. Extensive experiments demonstrate that while current models struggle on the task, traditional metrics completely collapse under semantic reversals. Conversely, our framework delivers a solid benchmark for SNUS, providing a rigorous foundation to advance risk-aware situational comprehension and counterfactual cognition.
Traditional scene understanding focuses on affirmative information objectively present in images. However, in safety-critical domains, comprehending key information that should exist but is actually absent is vital for risk mitigation. To bridge this gap, we focus on visual scene negative captioning with safety as the cognitive constraint. The core challenge is to convert physical absence into semantic negative events. Existing vision-language models (VLMs) struggle with this process because affirmation bias suppresses negative reasoning, while limited mental filling capability and representation bias further hinder the inference of absent information. To address these challenges, we propose a negative captioning framework based on counterfactual reconstruction and contrastive decoding (CRCD). Inspired by human cognition, CRCD reformulates the task as counterfactual latent change captioning to bypass affirmation bias. It contrasts a synthesized safe expectation with reality to identify semantic omissions. To address limited mental filling, we design a dual-branch counterfactual reconstruction architecture. The amodal completion branch restores defective objects, while the functional association branch infers completely absent safety objects. Concurrently, a multi-condition representation learning mechanism is integrated to mitigate representation bias by projecting universal features onto predefined safety criteria subspaces, thereby capturing information across more dimensions. By decoding feature-level semantic residuals between the reconstructed scene prototype and raw input, CRCD bounds the non-existence search space and activates the decoder's negative logic. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of CRCD, establishing a high-performance baseline for this pioneering task.
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) exhibit shortfalls when interpreting images and, by some measures, have poorer spatial cognition than young children or animals. Despite this, they attain high scores on many popular visual benchmarks, with headroom rapidly eroded by model progress. This creates a need for difficult benchmarks that remain relevant for longer. We introduce ZeroBench - a lightweight visual reasoning benchmark curated using adversarial filtering to be "impossible" for frontier LMMs at its original release, with initial SotA scores of 0% pass@1 and pass^5. We track progress on ZeroBench over the subsequent year, observing SotA reaching 6% pass^5 and 19% pass@5, indicating the potential longevity of the benchmark. We evaluate 46 LMMs on ZeroBench, compare performance to a human baseline, analyse strengths and weaknesses, chart a year of progress in visual capabilities, and publicly release ZeroBench at https://zerobench.github.io.
Jonathan Roberts, Mohammad Reza Taesiri, Ansh Sharma +31
Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks, yet it remains unclear to what extent such performance reflects reasoning directly grounded in visual evidence. We introduce VisReason, a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning in everyday scenarios where perception and inference are tightly coupled. VisReason contains 1,505 questions across 10 categories spanning perceptual, structural, and conceptual reasoning. Our evaluation shows that VisReason poses a qualitatively different challenge from existing benchmarks, exposing substantial gaps between humans and current MLLMs and revealing limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. VisReason offers a focused diagnostic for evaluating vision-centric reasoning beyond language.