Brownian Heads for Deep ReLU Representations: Activation Mass and the Cost of Same-Sample Selection
Organizations: Faculty of Engineering Free University of Bozen–Bolzano 39100 Bolzano, Italy · Institute for Statistics and Foundations of Machine Learning Technische Universität Braunschweig Universitätsplatz 2 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Abstract
Deep representation learning often selects hidden features and fits the final predictor on the same sample, so fixed-feature analysis performed after selection can omit selection cost. We study the conditional empirical Rademacher complexity of deep ReLU representations followed by bounded-norm predictors in additive or Lévy-Brownian RKHSs, termed Brownian heads. For a fixed representation, we derive an exact dual identity and sharp bounds in terms of activation mass, the average norm of the observed hidden vectors. Under same-sample selection, the representation supremum induces a quadratic Rademacher process. Brownian layer-cake and Gaussian-projection identities reduce it to coordinatewise or signed projected threshold traces, separating realized scale from selection complexity. For samples with pairwise-distinct inputs, explicit scalar ReLU families match the finite-trace and VC rates up to universal constants at the realized trace-and-envelope level. Induced-norm contraction also yields architecture-level bounds for rectangular, rank-deficient ReLU networks. Experiments verify the sharp bounds and rates, exhibit a selection gap at fixed activation mass, and assess the predictive feasibility of Brownian heads.
Figures & tables
| Method | CIFAR-10 | CIFAR-100 | EuroSAT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear ridge | |||
| RBF KRR | |||
| Laplace KRR | |||
| Brownian | |||
| Brownian |
Appendix figures & tables15 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Block | Contents | Connection to the main paper |
|---|---|---|
| A | Proofs and proof tools for canonical geometry, ReLU propagation, the fixed-head theorem, threshold chaos, same-sample bounds, matching trace dependence, and the explicit network corollary | Direct proof destination for every formal result retained in the nine-page paper |
| B | Gram, centered, spectral, covariance, root-mass, width, trace, representer, ridge, finite-realization, vector-valued, generalization, and rescaling results | Optional refinements and computational consequences for the terminal-head analysis |
| C | Exact theorem-aligned diagnostics, learned same-sample families, frozen-feature transfer, digits checks, and reproducibility details | Full evidence and protocols supporting Section 4 |
| D | Fixed-measure BKL links, recursive Brownian chains, dyadic and affine propagation, and sample compression | Optional independent extension; not an ingredient of the main terminal-head theorems |
| Method | Test accuracy (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Source-trained neural head | – | |
| Frozen-feature linear probe | – | |
| Additive Brownian head ( ) | ||
| Lévy–Brownian head ( ) |
| quantity | fitted slope | deterministic check | |
|---|---|---|---|
| finite traces vs. | 0.9785 | 0.99982 | slope in |
| VC traces vs. | 0.9804 | 0.99981 | slope in |
| Dataset | Method | Accuracy (%) | Macro-F1 (%) | Fit (s) | Predict (s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFAR-10 | Brownian | 500 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| CIFAR-10 | Brownian | 500 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| CIFAR-10 | Laplace KRR | 500 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| CIFAR-10 | Linear ridge | 500 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| CIFAR-10 | RBF KRR | 500 | 0.01 | 0.02 | ||
| CIFAR-10 | Brownian | 1000 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Dataset | Brownian head | Gain over linear (pp) | Interval (pp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFAR-10 | Brownian | 500 | -0.25 | [-0.48, -0.05] |
| CIFAR-10 | Brownian | 500 | 0.65 | [0.49, 0.82] |
| CIFAR-10 | Brownian | 1000 | 0.04 | [-0.20, 0.25] |
| CIFAR-10 | Brownian | 1000 | 1.03 | [0.92, 1.13] |
| CIFAR-100 | Brownian | 500 | 0.10 | [-0.26, 0.54] |
| CIFAR-100 | Brownian | 500 | 1.29 | [0.90, 1.69] |
| Dataset | Comparator | Difference (pp) | Interval (pp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFAR-10 | Laplace KRR | 500 | -0.06 | [-0.13, 0.06] |
| CIFAR-10 | Linear ridge | 500 | 0.65 | [0.49, 0.82] |
| CIFAR-10 | Laplace KRR | 1000 | -0.01 | [-0.25, 0.22] |
| CIFAR-10 | Linear ridge | 1000 | 1.03 | [0.92, 1.13] |
| CIFAR-100 | Laplace KRR | 500 | 0.35 | [0.18, 0.61] |
| CIFAR-100 | Linear ridge | 500 | 1.29 | [0.90, 1.69] |