SignGPT: Toward LLM-Mediated Sign Language Interaction through Gloss-Free Translation and Generation
Organizations: Tsinghua University, China · Tencent AI Lab, China
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) provide limited support for sign language interaction. Unifying sign language translation (SLT) and generation (SLG) to enable sign language as both input and output can reduce switching between separate models during sign-text interaction. We present SignGPT, a unified, pose-based framework for gloss-free SLT and SLG. SignGPT integrates part-aware hierarchical representations of body, hand, and facial motion into a shared language model and employs asymmetric multi-token prediction and progressive training for bidirectional modeling. We evaluate SignGPT on How2Sign (ASL) and Phoenix-2014T (DGS) through benchmark comparisons, qualitative analyses, and component ablations. An exploratory study with 12 Deaf ASL signers assesses an LLM-mediated sign-to-sign response pipeline, highlighting the potential of unified modeling to support sign language conversation (SLC).
Figures & tables
| Method | Bi-T | Gloss | Input | Phoenix-2014T (DTW ) | How2Sign (DTW ) | |||||
| Pose | RGB | Body | Hand | Avg | Body | Hand | Avg | |||
| MotionGPT ( Jiang et al., 2023 ) | ✓ | ✓ | 8.97 | 10.14 | 9.45 | 9.43 | 10.96 | 9.82 | ||
| SOKE ( Zuo et al., 2025 ) | ✓ | 2.58 | 5.89 | 4.26 | 7.92 | 3.07 | 5.49 | |||
| T2S-GPT ( Yin et al., 2024 ) | ✓ | 7.32 | 9.86 | 8.28 | 7.15 | 11.21 | 8.49 | |||
| MoMask ( Guo et al., 2024 ) | ✓ | 3.55 | 6.75 | 5.38 | - | - | - | |||
| NSA ( Baltatzis et al., 2024 ) | ✓ | 3.09 | 6.80 | 5.41 | 7.83 | 7.33 | 7.44 | |||
| Method | Bi-T | Gloss | Input | Phoenix-2014T (Dev/Test) | How2Sign (Test) | |||||
| Pose | RGB | B4 | R | B4 | R | B4 | R | |||
| MotionGPT ( Jiang et al., 2023 ) | ✓ | ✓ | 11.53 | 27.14 | 10.98 | 27.05 | 8.72 | 28.61 | ||
| SLTCC ( Jang et al., 2025 ) | ✓ | - | - | - | - | 11.8 | 31.1 | |||
| SLT ( Camgoz et al., 2020 ) | ✓ | ✓ | 20.69 | 45.54 | 20.17 | 45.34 | - | - | ||
| CSGCR ( Zhao et al., 2021 ) | ✓ | 15.08 | 38.96 | 15.18 | 38.85 | - | - | |||
| Uni-Sign ( Li et al., 2025b ) | ✓ | ✓ | - | - | - | - | 14.9 | 36.0 | ||
| Method | M2T | T2T | T2M | Pipeline M2M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B4 | DR | B4 | DR | |
| MotionGPT ( Jiang et al., 2023 ) | 10.26 | 0.681 | 4.90 | 0.089 |
| SignGPT (Ours) | 21.83 | 0.714 | 13.69 | 0.236 |
| Method | Response Relevance | Subjective Pilot (1–5) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLM-AR (%) | Response Appropriateness | Motion Smoothness | |
| MotionGPT ( Jiang et al., 2023 ) | 15.7 | 2.71 | 1.26 |
| SignGPT (Ours) | 52.2 | 3.67 | 4.35 |
| Dataset | Method | MPJPE | PA-MPJPE | DTW-JPE | ACCEL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-Aware | BM-TCN | Hand-E | TSA | |||||
| Phoenix-2014T | Vanilla VQ-VAE | 45.5 | 30.9 | 4.52 | 39.4 | |||
| ✓ | 26.7 | 19.3 | 2.42 | 35.2 | ||||
| ✓ | ✓ | 24.5 | 19.1 | 2.31 | 34.8 | |||
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 21.7 | 16.9 | 2.03 | 32.4 | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 22.0 | 17.0 | 2.07 | 32.3 | |
| Method | SLG | SLT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHVQ | PHVQ+TSA | GHMLM | GHMLM IFT | Avg | B4 | R |
| MotionGPT | 9.45 | 10.98 | 27.05 | |||
| ✓ | 8.13 | 12.54 | 30.72 | |||
| ✓ | ✓ | 4.48 | 22.18 | 39.86 | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 4.36 | 22.95 | 41.28 | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 4.32 | 23.56 | 42.13 | |
Appendix figures & tables10 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Input Format | Phoenix-2014T | How2Sign | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Rot. | Vel. | MPJPE | PA-MPJPE | DTW-JPE | ACCEL | MPJPE | PA-MPJPE | DTW-JPE | ACCEL |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 23.1 | 18.2 | 2.24 | 28.5 | 22.3 | 17.9 | 1.97 | 6.38 |
| ✓ | ✓ | 23.3 | 17.9 | 2.26 | 28.9 | 22.9 | 18.3 | 2.14 | 6.46 | |
| ✓ | ✓ | 24.6 | 18.5 | 2.42 | 33.1 | 23.1 | 19.4 | 2.18 | 6.70 | |
| ✓ | 21.7 | 16.9 | 2.03 | 32.4 | 18.3 | 15.6 | 1.66 | 6.17 | ||
| Codebook Size | Phoenix-2014T (DTW ) | How2Sign (DTW ) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body | Hand | Avg | Body | Hand | Avg | ||
| 128 | 192 | 1.89 | 2.55 | 2.26 | 1.43 | 2.05 | 1.76 |
| 128 | 320 | 1.86 | 2.32 | 2.14 | 1.40 | 1.90 | 1.65 |
| 160 | 256 | 1.85 | 2.49 | 2.18 | 1.41 | 1.95 | 1.68 |
| 96 | 256 | 1.97 | 2.41 | 2.23 | 1.48 | 1.96 | 1.72 |
| 128 | 256 | 1.82 | 2.21 | 2.03 | 1.39 | 1.93 | 1.66 |
| Encoder | Phoenix-2014T | How2Sign | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPJPE | PA-MPJPE | DTW-JPE | ACCEL | MPJPE | PA-MPJPE | DTW-JPE | ACCEL | |
| Causal TCN ( Bai et al., 2018 ) | 30.6 | 23.9 | 2.94 | 43.6 | 25.8 | 22.0 | 2.40 | 8.30 |
| ResNet ( Zhang et al., 2023 ) | 23.6 | 17.4 | 2.17 | 33.9 | 19.9 | 16.1 | 1.78 | 6.45 |
| BM-TCN (Ours) | 21.7 | 16.9 | 2.03 | 32.4 | 18.3 | 15.6 | 1.66 | 6.17 |
| Hierarchical Strategy | Phoenix-2014T | How2Sign | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPJPE | PA-MPJPE | DTW-JPE | ACCEL | MPJPE | PA-MPJPE | DTW-JPE | ACCEL | |
| Hand-to-Body ( Lu et al., 2023 ) | 23.2 | 17.5 | 2.14 | 33.0 | 19.6 | 16.2 | 1.75 | 6.30 |
| Independent ( Lee et al., 2025 ; Zuo et al., 2025 ) | 22.0 | 17.3 | 2.04 | 32.7 | 18.5 | 16.0 | 1.67 | 6.22 |
| Body-to-Hand (Ours) | 21.7 | 16.9 | 2.03 | 32.4 | 18.3 | 15.6 | 1.66 | 6.17 |
| Dataset | SLG | SLT | ||
| Avg-DTW | B4 | R | ||
| Phoenix-2014T | 0.2 | 4.65 | 19.58 | 36.19 |
| 4.36 | 22.95 | 41.28 | ||
| 0.4 | 4.38 | 23.07 | 41.26 | |
| How2Sign | 0.2 | 5.32 | 13.81 | 35.27 |
| 4.82 | 16.42 | 37.69 | ||
| Dataset | Init. Scheme | SLG | SLT | |
| Avg-DTW | B4 | R | ||
| Phoenix-2014T | Random Init | 10.54 | 12.90 | 26.10 |
| Codebook | 4.36 | 22.95 | 41.28 | |
| How2Sign | Random Init | 8.85 | 9.23 | 23.83 |
| Codebook | 4.82 | 16.42 | 37.69 | |
| Dataset | Decoding Scheme | SLG | SLT | |
| Avg-DTW | B4 | R | ||
| Phoenix-2014T | Serial-AR | 5.48 | 14.59 | 28.00 |
| AMTP (ours) | 4.36 | 22.95 | 41.28 | |
| How2Sign | Serial-AR | 5.71 | 10.44 | 25.56 |
| AMTP (ours) | 4.82 | 16.42 | 37.69 | |
Sign Language Translation
Sign language translation maps continuous signing into written or spoken-language text using visual, pose, and linguistic cues.
See all 50 papers