COREM: Cosine-Relation Momentum Reshaping with Stateful Writeback

Memory-efficient matrix optimizers such as Sinkhorn gradient descent remove most AdamW optimizer state for dense Transformer matrices, but direct application to Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) training is unreliable. We study this failure in a controlled 110M-parameter nanowhale DeepSeek-style MoE pretraining setting. A SAGE/Sinkhorn hybrid reduces optimizer state from 0.883GB to 0.331GB but degrades evaluation loss to 3.8265, far above the AdamW baselines observed in the same setup (3.58--3.64 across the seeds we study). We show that routed MoE expert matrices are the dominant failure point: their gradients are conditional, temporally varying, and poorly served by stateless Sinkhorn normalization. We propose MESH, a hidden-momentum Sinkhorn update for MoE experts. MESH restores a temporal first-moment signal through the gradient-buffer lifecycle, without storing the expert first moment as optimizer state. MESH is an optional block-preconditioned variant that adds a coarse neuron/block inverse-RMS multiplier. Across ablations, temporal smoothing before matrix normalization is the primary causal ingredient; block/neuron preconditioning can improve the memory-quality frontier, but is not established as universally necessary. In two additional seeds, MESH and MESH-B reduce optimizer-state memory by 62.5% and peak PyTorch CUDA allocation by about 12.6% relative to AdamW, with a modest evaluation-loss gap. Full-state diagnostic variants recover AdamW-like performance in ablations, supporting the conclusion that MoE experts need temporal smoothing, but not necessarily full coordinate-wise AdamW state.

Orthogonalized-momentum optimizers such as Muon improve transformer training by approximately whitening/orthogonalizing matrix-valued momentum updates via a short polar-decomposition iteration. However, polar-factor approximations typically require multiple large matrix multiplications, and the resulting overhead can be substantial and hardware-dependent. We introduce MUD (MomentUm Decorrelation), a complementary whitening approach that replaces Muon's polar update with a triangular (Cholesky-like) whitening surrogate inspired by classical Gram--Schmidt and Gauss-Seidel ideas. We show that row-orthonormal matrices are fixed points of the MUD map, relate the inner step to symmetric Gauss-Seidel preconditioning of the Gram matrix, and prove quadratic local convergence near the fixed point. In terms of time-to-perplexity, MUD yields consistent 10-50% wall-clock improvements over tuned AdamW and Muon in time-to-perplexity, typically converging slightly slower per step than Muon but with substantially lower optimizer overhead -- relative to Muon, MUD improves peak tokens/s by roughly $1.3-2.6\times$ across most settings and up to nearly $3\times$ on GPT-2 large on an A100. We also demonstrate training a ESM-2 150M protein language model, where MUD matches Muon-level validation perplexity in significantly less wall-clock time.

Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training. Its empirical success has motivated a growing body of theoretical work that interprets Muon as steepest descent under the spectral norm. Yet it remains unclear which of Muon's advantages stem from its update rule itself and which are artifacts of the scale, architecture, and data of modern deep networks. In this work, we isolate the optimizer from these confounding factors by studying Muon on a simple, well-understood, and spectrally structured problem: low-rank matrix factorization. Through a controlled comparison against carefully tuned adaptive baselines, we find that Muon does not consistently outperform AdamW in this setting and that several previously reported advantages are sensitive to hyperparameter choices. Our results provide a more nuanced picture of when spectrum-aware orthogonalization is beneficial and argue for evaluating modern optimizers on controlled problems in addition to end-to-end benchmarks.