Sensing to Intelligence: Principles for Neuromorphic Circuits and Systems

Neuromorphic engineering has matured over the past four decades and is currently experiencing explosive growth with the potential to transform biomedical engineering and neurotechnologies. Participants at the Neuromorphic Principles in Biomedicine and Healthcare (NPBH) Workshop (October 2024) -- representing a broad cross-section of the community, including early-career and established scholars, engineers, scientists, clinicians, industry, and funders -- convened to discuss the state of the field, current and future challenges, and strategies for advancing neuromorphic research and development for biomedical applications. Publicly approved recordings with transcripts (https://2024.neuro-med.org/program/session-video-and-transcripts) and slides (https://2024.neuro-med.org/program/session-slides) can be found at the workshop website.

Physical implementations of neural computation now extend far beyond silicon hardware, encompassing substrates such as memristive devices, photonic circuits, mechanical metamaterials, microfluidic networks, chemical reaction systems, and living neural tissue. By exploiting intrinsic physical processes such as charge transport, wave interference, elastic deformation, mass transport, and biochemical regulation, these substrates can realize neural inference and adaptation directly in matter. As silicon GPU-centered AI faces growing energy and data-movement constraints, physical neural computation is becoming increasingly relevant as a complementary path beyond conventional digital accelerators. This trend is driven in particular by pervasive intelligence, i.e., the deployment of on-device and edge AI across large numbers of resource-constrained systems. In such settings, co-locating computation with sensing and memory can reduce data shuttling and improve efficiency. Meanwhile, physical neural approaches have emerged across disparate disciplines, yet progress remains fragmented, with limited shared terminology and few principled ways to compare platforms. This survey unifies the field by mapping neural primitives to substrate-specific mechanisms, analyzing architectural and training paradigms, and identifying key engineering constraints including scalability, precision, programmability, and I/O interfacing overhead. To enable cross-domain comparison, we introduce a first-order benchmarking scheme based on standardized static and dynamic tasks and physically interpretable performance dimensions. We show that no single substrate dominates across the considered dimensions; instead, physical neural systems occupy complementary operating regimes, enabling applications ranging from ultrafast signal processing and in-memory inference to embodied control and in-sample biochemical decision making.

In biological systems, sensing is not performed by the brain alone: the body deforms, vibrates, and filters external stimuli before they are transduced into neural signals. In engineered systems, this processing burden is placed largely on electronics and computation, while the mechanical body is usually designed only for strength and stability. Here, we present sensing intelligence as a trainable property of the body. We show that the geometry of a metamaterial can be optimized to reshape external stimuli into internal signals that are easier for a neural network to interpret. Rather than hand-designing this physical preprocessing, we let the neural network train its own body for sensing by backpropagating the sensing loss to the body's design parameters through differentiable simulation. Across numerical and experimental sensing scenarios, the optimized body improves sensing accuracy by up to fivefold or reduces the number of required electronic sensors by nearly an order of magnitude.