cs.GTSep 19, 2026

A Horizon-Independent Regret Bound for Optimistic Hedge in General-Sum Games

Authors: Junsoo Ha

Abstract

Can simple learning rules keep their regret bounded in self-play? Recent work achieves constant regret bounds through modified regularization and higher-order prediction. Yet for Optimistic Hedge, arguably the most canonical method in games, the best known individual regret bound remains logarithmic. In this work, we prove that plain Optimistic Hedge with a constant step size can attain On,d(1)O_{n,d}(1) individual regret in general-sum games with nn players and d=(d1,…,dn)d=(d_1,\ldots,d_n) actions, under expected loss-vector feedback. As a corollary, its time-averaged play enjoys an On,d(1/T)O_{n,d}(1/T) coarse correlated equilibrium (CCE) gap. Our analysis represents Optimistic Hedge as a real-analytic recurrence on a compact space, which yields an exact finite-order difference relation that eliminates horizon dependence. Our proof hinges on nonconstructive Noetherianity argument of Frisch (1967), so the (n,d)(n,d)-dependence remains implicit.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 18, 2026

Multiplicative Optimism for Constant Regret in Games

We introduce Multiplicatively Optimistic Regret Matching (MORM), an uncoupled learning rule for finite general-sum games. Under simultaneous full-information self-play, every player achieves external regret O(nlog⁡d)O(\sqrt n\log d) uniformly over all horizons, using only one-step optimism. The analysis combines a potential-based regret-matching argument with multiplicative stability and Hellinger control of strategy movement. A learning-rate safeguard additionally gives O(Tlog⁡d)O(\sqrt{T\log d}) regret in the face of adversarial utilities.
Sep 3, 2026

Constant regret in general games via higher-order optimism

We introduce an uncoupled learning algorithm which, when employed by all players of an arbitrary NN-player normal form game with up to KK actions per player, guarantees O(N3log⁡2K)O(N^3\log^2 K) individual regret, uniformly over the horizon of play. The proposed algorithm - which we call higher-order optimism with discounting (HOOD) is a variant of optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader (OptFTRL) that combines a discounted (N+1)(N+1)-th order predictor with entropic regularization over a suitable "lifting" of the game's strategy space. This combination of ingredients is purposefully designed to dampen large oscillations of the induced sequence of play in a controlled manner, removing in this way a key stumbling block of previous attempts to achieve constant regret in general games. Our approach bears several striking similarities to the concurrent - and completely independent - work of Liu, Farina, and Ozdaglar (arXiv:2608.31166), who very recently derived an O(N21log⁡4K)O(N^{21}\log^{4} K) regret bound through the use of higher-order optimism and an exponential moving average estimator.
Aug 31, 2026

Constant Individual Regret in General Games

Uncoupled no-regret dynamics provide a decentralized route to equilibrium, but prior guarantees for individual regret retain a polylogarithmic dependence on the horizon. We remove this dependence for every finite NN-player normal-form game under full-information feedback. We introduce ECHO-OFTRL: optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader (OFTRL) equipped with an EMA cascade for high-order optimism (ECHO), where EMA denotes exponential moving average. The algorithm is deterministic and fully uncoupled. If mmax⁡m_{\max} denotes the largest action-set size, then, simultaneously for every horizon T≥1T\geq1, it guarantees that each of the NN players in the game incurs regret upper bounded by O(poly(N,log⁡mmax⁡))O(\textrm{poly}(N, \log m_{\max})). Our algorithm leverages a new form of optimism inspired by modern filter design.