MinCU: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Grounded Minimal-Change Understanding in Image Pairs

Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced rapidly, they still face notable challenges in fine-grained multi-image understanding, often exhibiting spatial hallucination, attention leakage, and failures in object constancy. In addition, existing approaches typically rely on expensive human annotations or large-scale chain-of-thought (CoT) data generation. We propose Compositional Grounded Contrast (abbr. CGC), a low-cost full framework for boosting fine-grained multi-image understanding of MLLMs. Built on existing single-image grounding annotations, CGC constructs compositional multi-image training instances through Inter-Image Contrast and Intra-Image Contrast, which introduce semantically decoupled distractor contexts for cross-image discrimination and correlated cross-view samples for object constancy, respectively. CGC further introduces a Rule-Based Spatial Reward within the GRPO framework to improve source-image attribution, spatial alignment, and structured output validity under a Think-before-Grounding paradigm. Experiments show that CGC achieves state-of-the-art results on fine-grained multi-image benchmarks, including MIG-Bench and VLM2-Bench. The learned multi-image understanding capability also transfers to broader multimodal understanding and reasoning tasks, yielding consistent gains over the Qwen3-VL-8B base model on MathVista (+2.90), MuirBench (+2.88), MMStar (+1.93), MMMU (+1.77), and BLINK (+1.69).

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) perform strongly on general visual understanding tasks such as visual question answering, yet they often struggle with a basic comparative skill: identifying what has changed between two similar images. We introduce VDiff-Bench, a challenging multiple-choice benchmark for fine-grained Image Difference Identification. VDiff-Bench contains 1,756 four-way questions over image pairs and covers 10 change categories: position, motion, regional image color, overall image color, appearance/disappearance, noise/resolution, texture, substitution/size, OCR/text, and illumination. Each question corresponds to two image inputs with 4 choices: the true difference, two hard negative descriptions, and a "no difference" distractor. To make the task challenging, we specifically curate ground-truth-conditioned negatives that require models to distinguish the actual change from nearby semantic alternatives. Experiments with 11 state-of-the-art open- and closed-source MLLMs show that fine-grained visual comparison remains brittle: models exhibit uneven performance across sources and change categories, with persistent failures on subtle low-level changes like noises and textures. For instance, three 7-8B-scale open-source MLLMs score 52.5-70.6% on semantic changes but only 8.7-33.3% on low-level changes like noise and texture, falsely assuming no changes between two image inputs. Surprisingly, despite strong performance of other closed-source commercial models, Grok 4.3 demonstrate remarkable performance drop on identifying noise and texture differences between images, falling significantly behind large open-source models like Kimi K2.5 and K3. Overall, VDiff-Bench provides a targeted diagnostic for evaluating comparative visual understanding in MLLMs, exposing failures that are not captured by standard single-image vision-language tasks.

Long-term change understanding from images of the same place revisited over time is a challenging task with applications in map maintenance and urban infrastructure monitoring. Prior work addresses it either through pixel-level prediction or difference captioning, neither of which is sufficient to reliably measure how well models detect and describe such changes. We introduce SPOT-THE-SHIFT, a human-verified benchmark for grounded image difference captioning of long-term changes in real-world driving scenes. Our benchmark provides natural language captions and spatial masks for structural changes across each image pair. We further propose an evaluation protocol that reliably assesses models' captioning ability, validated through human studies. Benchmarking state-of-the-art MLLMs, we find that models struggle with the fine-grained multi-image spatial capability required for this task. Finally, we develop a synthetic data generation pipeline that improves an off-the-shelf MLLM without sacrificing general capabilities.