Continual learning with Low-Rank Adapters (LoRA) typically mitigates forgetting by penalizing the overlap between a new update and the accumulated past weights, which discourages certain update directions without controlling how an update distributes its energy over the ones that remain. We ask whether that restriction has to be task-aware, or whether a generic one supplied by the optimizer is enough. We train a plain incremental LoRA (IncLoRA) with Muon, which orthogonalizes each update, and compare it against O-LoRA and ELLA over five seeds and three task orders on the Standard CL Benchmark and three seeds on TRACE. IncLoRA+Muon reaches the accuracy band of the dedicated methods on Standard CL and improves on every AdamW configuration on TRACE. One update-constraining mechanism is enough, whether it comes from the loss or from the optimizer; on Standard CL a second one does not help, and for the most restrictive method it costs 8.4 points of accuracy and the plasticity to fit each task. What separates the two optimizers is not the size of the update, which under Muon is 0.91 to 2.06 times that under AdamW, but how it is distributed. AdamW confines it to between 1.4 and 1.8 effective singular directions, Muon spreads it over 7.0, and the two do not overlap in any tracked run. Part of the advantage usually attributed to dedicated CL methods may therefore be explained by the geometry of the optimizer's updates.
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become the standard tool for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large pretrained models. When applied sequentially across tasks in Continual Learning (CL), the standard assumption is that each new task requires a dedicated low-rank adapter. In this work, we challenge this assumption empirically and structurally. We show that task-specific LoRA adapters in CL exhibit significant low-rank redundancy: the subspaces spanned by adapters trained on different tasks substantially overlap, and in many cases earlier adapters can faithfully represent later tasks. Building on this observation, we propose LiteLoRA, a plug-and-play gating mechanism that learns at train time whether to recruit a new adapter or reuse existing low-rank representations. Our method reduces the number of active adapters by 20-70% while matching or exceeding state-of-the-art performance on standard CL benchmarks, revealing that structural redundancy is pervasive and that selective learning is sufficient to achieve stability without sacrificing plasticity.
While orthogonal subspace methods try to mitigate task interference in Continual Learning (CL), they often suffer from energy diffusion across the basis, hindering knowledge compaction and exhausting capacity for future tasks. We observe that output feature drift induced by parameter updates is inherently low-rank, and theoretically prove that preserving parameters along the principal directions of this drift minimizes the output reconstruction error. Motivated by this, we propose \textbf{E}nergy-Concentrated and \textbf{E}nergy-Ordered \textbf{Lo}w-\textbf{R}ank \textbf{A}daptation (E2-LoRA). By explicitly ordering and concentrating knowledge into leading ranks, E2-LoRA frees capacity for subsequent tasks. Furthermore, we design a dynamic rank allocation strategy to balance stability and plasticity by jointly optimizing energy retention and model plasticity. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that E2-LoRA achieves state-of-the-art performance. Code is available at https://github.com/kiddo127/E2-LoRA.
LoRA is widely adopted for continual fine-tuning of Large Language Models due to its parameter efficiency, modularity across tasks, and compatibility with replay strategies. However, LoRA-based continual learning remains vulnerable to catastrophic forgetting, whose severity depends on how successive task gradients interact: when consecutive task gradients conflict, standard adapter initializations channel updates into subspaces that overwrite previously learned directions. We propose SLICE, a gradient-surgery-based initialization for LoRA adapters in continual learning. SLICE accumulates gradients from both the current task and a replay buffer of prior tasks, reconciles them through a projection operator, and decomposes the result via truncated SVD to initialize the adapter weights. We evaluate SLICE on the TRACE benchmark and sequences of Super-NI tasks, including a set of adversarial Super-NI sequences that we construct by mining task pairs with maximally opposing gradients. Compared to vanilla LoRA, LoRA-GA, and LoRAM, SLICE consistently achieves a better stability-plasticity trade-off, improving Average Performance, Final Performance and Forgetting metrics while preserving General Performance and In Context Performance across both standard and adversarial continual learning sequences.
Joana Pasquali, Ramiro N. Barros, Arthur S. Bianchessi +7