While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities, they continue to suffer from a critical limitation: insufficient fine-grained visual perception, which fundamentally limits their multimodal understanding. We attribute this bottleneck to text-dominant optimization biases during pre-training, which encourage the model to overlook fine-grained visual details, thereby limiting the capability of multimodal understanding. We investigate that overcoming this bottleneck requires two key elements: (1) a unified token space paradigm that ensures stable training dynamics, and (2) a modality-aligned dense visual supervision signal enriched with both structural granularity and semantic information to capture critical visual representations. Based on these insights, we propose VIVAS, a framework built upon the unified token space paradigm, which introduces a dense-structural-semantic vision tokenizer, which expands the textual vocabulary into a unified vision-language vocabulary by incorporating a visual vocabulary. During pretraining, VIVAS performs vision-language unified autoregressive supervision over both visual details and linguistic content, thereby enhancing visual perception to improve multimodal understanding. Trained end-to-end on 12.4T tokens, VIVAS achieves state-of-the-art performance across 7 tasks and 39 multimodal benchmarks.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Left: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) visualizations of hidden states extracted from the output-layer vision tokens, VIVAS demonstrates significantly more fine-grained visual perception. Right: Comprehensive multimodal understanding evaluation of VIVAS against the SOTA Qwen3-VL (4B) and an ablated baseline without visual supervision. VIVAS yields substantial performance improvements.
Figure 2: Left : Previous text-dominant VLMs lack direct visual supervision. Middle : To introduce visual supervision, VIVAS formulates a unified token space, fundamentally avoiding the instability inherent in architectural separation approaches. Right : Within this unified space, we introduce the dense-structural-semantic visual supervision signal, starkly outperforming detrimental pixel-level or ineffective semantic-level signals.
Figure 3: Comparison of training loss between architectural separation and unified token space. Vision and text losses correspond to the supervised training objectives for the visual and textual modalities, respectively.
Methods
VisuLogic
MMBenchEN
RealWorldQA
MME
CRPEEXIST
CRPERELATION
CVBench2D
HallusionBench
TextVQA
DocVQA
RefCOCO val
RefCOCOg val
w/o Visual Supervision
22.2
53.0
43.0
48.2
65.7
57.0
51.0
55.3
52.7
60.2
62.1
59.4
Text-decoupled vocabularies
21.6
51.2
41.8
46.9
63.5
55.1
49.3
53.9
51.4
58.6
60.7
57.8
Vision-language semantic vocabularies
23.6
53.6
43.2
47.7
66.2
57.6
51.4
54.8
53.1
59.3
63.0
60.7
Ours
24.4
54.9
46.5
49.8
72.2
59.0
56.3
56.5
54.2
63.4
65.2
63.1
Table 1: Performance comparison of various visual supervision strategies. All models are pre-trained on a 0.5T-token corpus and evaluated under a 5-shot setting across diverse multimodal benchmarks.
Figure 4: Overview of VIVAS. Left : The dense structural–semantic vision tokenizer constructs a visual codebook by fusing semantic and geometric features through cross-attention. Right : During end-to-end pretraining, VIVAS performs unified autoregressive supervision over both the textual vocabulary and the vision vocabulary.
Pre-train VS
Post-train VS
VisuLogic
MMBench EN
CRPE relation
HallusionBench
×
×
23.1
83.2
69.5
57.3
✓
×
25.7
83.9
72.2
59.1
×
✓
23.3
82.9
69.9
57.7
✓
✓
23.6
83.3
70.1
58.1
Table 2: Ablation study of applying visual supervision at different training stages.
Benchmarks
LLaVA-OV
Qwen3-VL
LLaVA-OV
InternVL-3.5
Qwen3-VL
VIVAS w/o
VIVAS
1.5
instruct
1.5
instruct
Vision Sup.
(Ours)
Params
8B
8B
4B
4B
4B
4B
4B
General VQA
MMBench CN [ 24 ]
81.0
84.7
76.9
–
83.5
82.7
83.6
MMBench EN [ 24 ]
84.1
84.5
84.2
80.3
83.9
83.2
83.9
MMStar [ 3 ]
67.7
70.9
64.9
65.0
69.8
70.4
71.1
Table 3: Performance comparison between VIVAS and SOTA VLMs across multiple benchmarks. All scores adhere to official evaluation protocols. The results reproduced via our internal evaluation system are marked with ‘*’.
Codebook Size
VisuLogic
MMBench EN
CRPE relation
HallusionBench
Utilization (%)
50k
23.6
53.5
57.3
55.6
98.3
100k
24.0
54.1
58.1
56.1
98.6
150k
24.4
54.9
59.0
56.5
97.7
200k
24.2
54.5
58.7
56.3
96.6
Table 4: Ablation study on the codebook size of the visual tokenizer.
Codebook Dim
VisuLogic
MMBench EN
CRPE relation
HallusionBench
Utilization (%)
64
22.7
53.1
57.4
55.5
95.1
256
23.6
53.7
58.6
55.9
97.8
768
24.4
54.9
59.0
56.5
97.7
1024
23.9
54.6
58.6
56.4
94.3
Table 5: Ablation study on the codebook embedding dimension of the visual tokenizer.
Benchmark
Qwen3-VL-4B
VIVAS w/o VS
VIVAS
Gain
GEOBench-VLM [ 5 ]
40.21
44.64
46.37
+1.73
VLMsAreBiased [ 43 ]
21.31
18.33
22.16
+3.83
V* [ 47 ]
80.63
78.53
81.15
+2.62
Table 6: Out-of-distribution and fine-grained perception evaluation.
L1 Loss
VisuLogic
MMBench EN
CRPE relation
HallusionBench
×
24.4
54.9
59.0
56.5
✓
23.7
54.2
57.9
56.1
Table 7: Ablation study on adding L1 loss during codebook training.
Method
VisuLogic
CVBench2D
MME
RefCOCO val
DocVQA
HallusionBench
VIVAS w/o VS
22.2
51.0
48.2
62.1
60.2
55.3
w/ combined visual encoder
22.6
50.7
48.5
60.9
60.5
54.6
VIVAS
24.4
56.3
49.8
65.2
63.4
56.5
Table 8: Comparison with a combined visual encoder baseline. The combined visual encoder baseline uses SigLIP2 and DINOv3 features with a learnable projector, but does not use visual-token supervision.
Figure 5: Scaling analysis of VIVAS. (a) The evolution of average performance across 27 multimodal benchmarks as a function of training tokens. The results reveal steady and consistent capability improvements during training across different data regimes, indicating that the model effectively exploits large-scale data without showing signs of empirical saturation. (b) Examination of the mean evaluation error ( 1−Score ). The optimization dynamics in both Stage 2 and Stage 3 follow neural scaling laws, with scaling exponents estimated at α≈0.102 and α≈0.079 , respectively.
Despite remarkable advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), their fine-grained visual understanding is constrained by a primary reliance on sparse textual supervision. Existing efforts to introduce visual supervision typically do so during post-training, when visual representations have already been largely fixed, causing such signals to act mainly as auxiliary constraints rather than as a primary force for shaping perceptual features. In this paper, we aim to fundamentally reshape the model's perceptual backbone by incorporating vision supervision directly into the pre-training stage. We observe that pixel-level image patches and textual tokens naturally coexist in a shared, raw high-dimensional space characterized by an inherent input symmetry. Leveraging this insight, we propose UVU, a novel vision-language unified autoregressive framework that eschews vector quantization. It uniquely employs continuous visual encoding for lossless representation of visual inputs and proposes a large-scale iterative hierarchical clustering algorithm to construct a pixel-level visual codebook, thereby extending the vocabulary for unified supervision and enabling autoregressive generation of pixel-level image tokens alongside textual tokens. UVU effectively synergizes pixel-level visual perception with semantic-level visual understanding, internalizing visual reconstruction capabilities and unlocking the facilitative role of visual supervision in enhancing understanding in the pre-training stage. Extensive experiments across multiple tasks demonstrate that MLLMs are capable of achieving superior multimodal understanding performance under the supervised learning paradigm of UVU.
Zhehan Kan, Xinghua Jiang, Yubo Zhu +10
Tsinghua University · Tencent Youtu Lab · Nanjing University +1
Multimodal large language models are typically trained end-to-end to predict ground-truth answers, yet supervision signals are applied exclusively to text tokens. Visual tokens, the core carriers of visual information, are optimized only implicitly as part of the context, leading to coarse-grained visual understanding. Prior works attempt to supervise visual inputs but inevitably rely on auxiliary components such as additional decoders or forward passes, because visual tokens lack readily interpretable labels. This limits their practical applicability. In this work, we propose Direct Vision Supervised Fine-Tuning (DV-SFT), which constructs explicit, token-level supervision for visual tokens and trains them through the same next-token prediction objective used for text. Specifically, we exploit the direct vision--text correspondence in OCR-related scenarios and automatically label each visual token with the word in its corresponding image patch. DV-SFT treats the MLLM as a black box, requiring no architectural modifications or additional forward passes. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of direct vision supervision. DV-SFT consistently outperforms standard SFT across three in-domain and four out-of-domain benchmarks. Further analyses show that vision supervision effectively enhances fine-grained visual understanding and achieves higher multimodal alignment efficiency.
Jianfei Zhao, Feng Zhang, Xin Sun +3
School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology · 2Zhongguancun Academy · 5Southeast Academy of Information Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology +2
Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, they often fail on tasks that require fine-grained visual perception, even when the required information is still present in their internal representations. Prior work has attributed this ``hidden-in-plain-sight'' gap to the language model, but the cause remains unexplained. In this work, we demonstrate that this gap arises from the language model's lack of semantic labels for fine-grained visual details: when visual entities can be mapped to known concepts, VLMs bypass visual comparison and reason through language; when they cannot, VLMs resort to brittle and hallucinated descriptions. We verify this across semantic correspondence, synthetic shape matching, and face matching, and find that VLMs perform much better when the relevant entities are nameable than when they are unnamable. Mechanistically, Logit Lens analysis confirms that VLMs explicitly recover semantic labels for nameable entities and surface more unique tokens compared to unnameable entities. Furthermore, we show that this limitation can be addressed: teaching completely arbitrary names for unknown entities improves performance. More importantly, task-specific finetuning yields even stronger generalization without relying on language priors, i.e., through real visual perception. Our findings suggest that current VLM failures on visual tasks reflect a learned shortcut rather than a fundamental limitation of multimodal reasoning. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/Patchwork53/VLMs-Need-Words-COLM2026.