Unmasking Shortcut Learning in IoT Intrusion Detection: A Forensic, Multi-Paradigm Evaluation of Feature Dependence and Data Leakage

Lightweight machine learning models are increasingly proposed for intrusion detection in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) networks due to their suitability for resource-constrained edge deployment. Most reported results evaluate these models only within their training network, leaving behavior on unseen networks unverified. This study trains four lightweight architectures on one IIoT dataset and evaluates them, without retraining, on two structurally distinct IIoT datasets using a feature representation restricted to attributes available across all three sources. Explainability analysis across two top-performing models shows both rely overwhelmingly on coarse port-category features; the most influential category occurs in source-domain attack traffic at 96 to 435 times the rate in the two target domains, indicating that coarsening port resolution relocates rather than removes a documented shortcut. Evaluation under naturally imbalanced class distributions reveals a further effect: the evaluation protocol used can reverse which target network appears to pose the greater generalization challenge. Adversarial robustness and recovery through limited target-domain exposure are also assessed; robustness to adversarial perturbation is unrelated to cross-network generalization, and recovery through adaptation varies considerably by architecture. These findings suggest deployment readiness should be assessed using cross-network evaluation under realistic class distributions, rather than within-domain accuracy alone.

Classic Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) often rely on manual feature engineering to extract meaningful patterns from network traffic data. However, this approach requires domain expertise and runs counter to the widely adopted principle of modern machine learning and neural networks: that models themselves should learn meaningful representations directly from data. We investigate whether tabular representation learning techniques can improve intrusion detection performance by automatically learning robust feature representations for NetFlow data. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art representation learning methods on benchmark NetFlow datasets, comparing against traditional autoencoders and end-to-end transformer baselines. We evaluate learned representations using both supervised classifiers and unsupervised anomaly detectors, with comprehensive hyperparameter exploration for each combination. Our results reveal strong dataset-model dependency, with no single approach consistently dominating across all scenarios. For supervised classification, TabICL achieves the best performance on CIDDS, while autoencoders follow closely and tie with end-to-end transformer models for the best average rank across datasets. Supervised approaches substantially outperform unsupervised anomaly detection methods, where no single combination consistently dominates as optimal choices depend on the dataset. Cross-dataset transfer experiments demonstrate that learned representations can generalize across network environments with appropriate method and classifier selection. However, transfer performance varies substantially depending on the source-target dataset combination, indicating sensitivity to distributional differences between network environments.

The detection of intrusions in IoT-based networks poses challenges that cannot be overcome using traditional machine learning methods. Perhaps the biggest of them is related to the presence of a class imbalance in the side-channel dataset, where the number of samples in the normal class compared to the attacks can reach a ratio of 75,964 to 1. Such an aspect is addressed by Dominguez et al. through the proof of concept of power-based intrusion detection. Unfortunately, neither the authors attempt to cope with the problem of imbalance nor do they assess the classifier performance using a balanced training set. In the current paper, both aspects will be handled at once. First, a Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was performed on all nine possible datasets extracted from the initial one, providing an exact imbalance ratio of 1.1 for each. Then, eight algorithms i.e. Random Forest, HistGradientBoosting, LightGBM, Extra Trees, XGBoost, k-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Decision Tree were trained under identical conditions for the SMOTE balanced 6-hour dataset. Random Forest reached a micro-averaged F1 score of 0.9989 and macro F1 of 0.9794, thus outperforming the previously best micro-F1 result obtained by Time Series Forest algorithm from the base paper of 0.9983. Extra Trees provided the same performance as well, but at 10 times faster. The introduction of a macro-F1 metric explicitly in contrast to the base paper assessment reveals important class-level information missed with aggregate performance metrics. Recall rates per-class calculated with confusion matrices, F1 heatmaps, and ROC curves show that minority attack classes, especially those with combined M+L infections, are detected reliably only when using SMOTE balance. Feature importance analysis indicates the latest time steps as the most important predictor signals out of 60 steps in a power window.