From Text Decisions to Pixels: An Study of Jev-Style Visual Choice Model

Many vision applications ask several independent, forced-choice questions about the same image. Visual Jev encodes the image and public context once, executes isolated question suffixes as a batch, and reads candidate probabilities from the backbone's language-model head. Across four benchmarks, answer-supervised post-training raises equal-weight macro accuracy from 70.6% to 76.1%, with the gain concentrated on the two task families represented in training. At N=32 questions per image, shared batched execution is 8.9x faster in warm amortized time than independent serial execution and remains 3.4x faster than an already-batched baseline that recomputes the prefix, at the cost of higher peak memory. A matched typed-head control offers no consistent accuracy advantage over the language-model-head readout. The supported design is therefore simple: adapt the backbone for quality, retain the existing readout, and share execution for efficiency.

We present our ImageCLEF 2026 Multimodal Reasoning system for the Visual Multiple Choice Question Answering (Visual MCQ) and Visual Open Question Answering (Visual OpenQA) subtasks. The challenge requires reliable reasoning over multilingual educational and scientific images with dense text, diagrams, charts, tables, formulas, and units, while enforcing strict answer formats. Our central finding is that robust output control is as important as model choice. For Visual MCQ, we replace fragile free-form generation with direct candidate label scoring from vision-language model logits, then combine complementary runs through score fusion and voting. For Visual OpenQA, we use image enhancement, concise final answer prompting, deterministic decoding, and targeted post-processing to remove reasoning traces and formatting artifacts. Without task-specific model training, our official submissions achieved third place in Visual MCQ with 0.7108 accuracy and first place in Visual OpenQA with 0.6488 COMET, 0.1391 BLEU, 0.2762 ROUGE L, and 0.2383 METEOR. The results highlight the practical value of inference engineering: careful scoring, ensembling, prompting, and cleanup can turn strong VLMs into reliable competition systems.

Establishing a clear link between model predictions and the visual evidence that supports them is critical for transparency and reliability in multimodal reasoning, yet current multimodal large language model (MLLM) evaluations do not explicitly enforce this alignment. Existing benchmarks assess either textual answer correctness or pixel-level localization in isolation, leaving the coupling of reasoning and grounding an open challenge. We introduce VISTAQA, a comprehensive benchmark for joint evaluation of free-form answer correctness and pixel-level evidence grounding in visual question answering. VISTAQA comprises 1,157 expert-curated samples spanning six task types and six visual domains, ranging from direct perception to compositional and relational reasoning. VISTAQA requires models to not only answer correctly, but to also provide precise segmentation masks that support their answers. It also includes hallucination-aware examples where no valid visual evidence exists. To support this enhanced evaluation, we introduce GROVE, a unified evaluation metric that enforces joint correctness by combining textual accuracy and grounding quality via a per-sample geometric mean, ensuring neither dimension can compensate for deficiencies in the other. Comprehensive experiments across grounding-aware models and hybrid pipelines with general-purpose MLLMs reveal that even the strongest systems achieve limited performance under GROVE, highlighting a substantial gap between answer accuracy and visual evidence alignment.