cs.LGSep 24, 2026

PoEM: Predicting RL Outcomes from Existing Policies

Authors: Kimia Hamidieh, Giannis Daras, Antonio Torralba

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Foundation models are post-trained with reinforcement learning (RL) to maximize specific rewards, such as human alignment, correctness, or instruction following. This post-training process is computationally intensive, sometimes unstable, and has to be run from scratch every time the reward model changes or when we want to combine multiple rewards. We hence ask: given a new reward function, is it possible to predict the RL outcomes without actually running RL on it? We answer this in the affirmative by introducing PoEM, a framework to predict the outputs of RL on a new reward function using a set of models already post-trained on other rewards. First, we show that if the new reward function can be written as a linear combination of existing ones, then the new policy in log-space can be written as a linear combination of the existing log-policies. Surprisingly, even in cases where the rewards are not linearly connected, we observe that often log-policies from RL training span an approximately low-rank subspace across rewards. To our benefit, the weighting coefficients for this combination can be estimated using only the reward or basis policy outputs on the samples. We turn these observations into an algorithm that takes post-trained models and a new reward function, and approximates the target RL policy without actually running any additional RL training. We experimentally validate our approach across synthetic and real rewards, spanning both text and image modalities.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 31, 2026cs.AI

Don't Mix Rewards, Mix Policies: Policy Decomposition and Optimization for Multi-Reward RL

Modern large language models (LLMs) are expected not just to answer correctly, but to adapt their behavior to different human values and use cases. As a result, multi-reward reinforcement learning (RL) has become an increasingly important problem for LLMs, where each reward captures a different aspect of desired behavior. However, optimizing with multiple rewards suffers from a more severe alignment tax issue, where different optimization objectives can trade off or even conflict with each other, leading to unstable and inefficient post-training. In this work, we propose PRISM, a new multi-reward RL framework built upon the idea of policy-space decomposition and composition. Instead of compositing different rewards, PRISM optimizes a set of standalone positive policies and a global negative policy. This alleviates the potential conflict during multi-reward policy optimization, while enabling controllability during inference by flexible policy composition. Experiments on scientific reasoning, tool-use reasoning, and helpfulness-safety alignment show that PRISM consistently outperforms existing multi-reward RL baselines, with extra controllability for inference-time preference control.
Ruiming Liang, Yi Zhong, Yizhen Yuan +6
Prism
AskPDF
Apr 28, 2026cs.LG

reward-lens: A Mechanistic Interpretability Library for Reward Models

Every RLHF-trained language model is shaped by a reward model, yet the mechanistic interpretability toolkit -- logit lens, direct logit attribution, activation patching, sparse autoencoders -- was built for generative LLMs whose primitives all project onto a vocabulary unembedding. Reward models replace that with a scalar regression head, breaking each tool. We present reward-lens, an open-source library that ports this toolkit to reward models, organised around one observation: the reward head's weight vector wrw_r is the natural axis for every interpretability question. The library provides a Reward Lens, component attribution, three-mode activation patching, a reward-hacking probe suite, TopK SAE feature attribution, cross-model comparison, and five theory-grounded extensions (distortion index, divergence-aware patching, misalignment cascade detection, reward-term conflict analysis, concept-vector analysis). A ten-method adapter protocol covers Llama, Mistral, Gemma-2, and ArmoRM multi-objective heads, with a generic adapter for any HuggingFace sequence classification model. We validate on two production reward models across ~695 RewardBench pairs. The central empirical finding is negative: linear attribution does not predict causal patching effects (mean Spearman ρ=−0.256ρ= -0.256 on Skywork, −0.027-0.027 on ArmoRM). The framework treats this disagreement as a property to expose, not a bug -- motivating a design that keeps observational and causal views first-class and directly comparable.
Mohammed Suhail B Nadaf
Process Reward ModelingMechanistic InterpretabilityModel InterpretabilityLogit Lens
AskPDF
Jan 17, 2026cs.LG

R2^2PO: Decoupling Rollout and Inference Policies for LLM Reasoning

Existing reinforcement learning methods for LLM reasoning implicitly assume that the policy generating training trajectories should coincide with the one producing inference responses. We argue that this is a misleading inductive bias: the optimization-optimal trajectory distribution favors informative gradients, whereas the inference-optimal response distribution emphasizes accuracy and consistency. Forcing both into a single policy entangles their gradients and suppresses exploration. We propose R2^2PO (Residual Rollout Policy Optimization), which attaches a lightweight Residual Rollout-Head atop the policy to decouple training trajectories from inference responses, diversifying rollouts during training while keeping inference generation intact. Experiments show that R2^2PO consistently outperforms baselines, with average accuracy gains of 3.4% on MATH-500 and 1.3% on APPS, alongside more diverse rollouts and reduced length bias. Our code is available at https://github.com/RRPO-ARR/Code.
Jingchu Wang, Bingbing Xu, Yige Yuan +4
Large Language Model ReasoningAutoregressive RolloutRolloutInference EngineInferringTrajectory Optimization
AskPDF