UNMATCH: Selective Unbalanced Token-Patch Matching for Forensic Image-Claim Verification

Multimodal manipulation detection aims to simultaneously identify forged image--text pairs and localize tampered regions, yet existing methods typically rely on memorizing isolated artifacts and struggle with imperceptible manipulation traces or domain shifts. Inspired by human comparative reasoning, we reformulate this task as a reference-grounded verification problem, where authenticity is assessed by comparing a query against retrieved authentic evidence. We propose REVEAL Reference-Enabled Verification for Evidence Analysis and Localization), a framework explicitly designed for this comparative paradigm. To support this paradigm, we construct a large-scale reference library comprising 170K authentic news image--text pairs featuring over 40K public figures. Technically, REVEAL employs a difference-aware fusion mechanism to capture fine-grained discrepancies between the query and retrieved evidence. Furthermore, we introduce a task-decoupled Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to jointly execute instance-level detection and fine-grained grounding, effectively mitigating optimization conflicts between these heterogeneous objectives. Extensive experiments demonstrate that REVEAL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, and notably enables training-free domain adaptation by simply updating the reference library, offering a robust and practical solution for detecting evolving misinformation. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/REVEAL-Reference-A006.

Advances in image generation have made visual authenticity increasingly difficult to assess. Although image forensics now examines both generation artifacts and higher-level visual inconsistencies, a plausible image can still contradict real-world facts or rules. We introduce WorldFact-Bench to evaluate image-world consistency from a single image, without a predefined claim or verification target. The benchmark contains 1,274 source-aligned real-fake pairs across four verification regimes and ten semantic domains. Each pair introduces a specific, evidence-supported factual conflict while seeking to preserve non-target content and visual plausibility. Images are evaluated independently, and pair accuracy requires both members of a pair to be classified correctly. We further propose PERSIST-Agent, which organizes iterative verification around a persistent state linking candidate facts, visual observations, evidence, and verification statuses. This state guides subsequent inspection and retrieval while retaining unresolved candidates. With backbone weights fixed, harness self-optimization refines the agent's prompts and execution rules through validation feedback. Experiments reveal strong label biases in several detectors and uneven gains from retrieval. On the evaluated 8B backbones, PERSIST-Agent improves pair accuracy over both direct judgment and retrieval-augmented baselines, while ablations support the role of persistent verification state. These findings highlight the value of state-guided verification and the remaining gap between visual plausibility and factual correctness.

Claims paired with AI-generated images are a rapidly growing form of misinformation. Existing automated fact-checking (AFC) methods mainly treat this as a provenance problem, detecting low-level synthesis artifacts to decide whether an image is AI-generated. However, such methods do not verify what human fact-checkers often check: whether an image's content is consistent with the context implied by its accompanying claim. To address this gap, we introduce MIC (Multimodal Inconsistency Checking), an AFC framework that assists human fact-checkers by detecting AI-generated multimodal misinformation and explaining inconsistencies using world knowledge. MIC first uses supervised fine-tuning (SFT) for task adaptation and then applies Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to directly optimize component-level verifiable rewards for verdict prediction, inconsistency type classification, visual evidence description, and world-knowledge explanation. We further introduce MIC-Bench, a benchmark comprising 8,812 image-claim instances derived from 4,406 claims, where each claim is paired with an authentic image and an AI-generated counterpart that introduces a controlled contextual inconsistency. Compared with SFT alone, GRPO further improves Macro-F1 by 4.67 and 4.11 points in the in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings, respectively, while also improving the semantic similarity of visual evidence descriptions and world-knowledge explanations to reference annotations. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/UKPLab/arxiv2026-mic.