OmniSmartHome: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Smart-Home Agents

Natural audio-visual interaction is emerging as an important interface for AI assistants, allowing users to communicate through speech and vision rather than carefully composed text prompts. However, existing benchmarks of interactive capabilities still focus primarily on response quality, leaving a more fundamental question underexplored: can a model correctly infer the user's underlying demand from complex multimodal interaction? Real-world user demands are often underspecified in speech and must be inferred from multimodal cues and dialogue history. This inference is further complicated by ambiguous or disfluent expression and noisy acoustic environments. Conversely, request-like speech may not constitute a demand to the assistant, leading to false triggers. We establish Omni Demand Understanding (ODU) as a distinct multimodal contextual inference problem: given an interaction stream, a model must detect whether a user demand is present and infer intent from multimodal and conversational context. ODU evaluates this capability along five dimensions, covering both single-turn and multi-turn interactions. We construct ODU-Bench using a challenge-driven taxonomy, taxonomy-guided agentic video generation, and human-recorded interactions, followed by media-grounded annotation and human verification. We evaluate 14 native MLLMs. Even the strongest, Gemini 3.1 Pro, recovers only 44.7% of key information that must be inferred from visual, acoustic, or conversational context. Moreover, 11 of the 14 models exhibit false-trigger rates above 50% on non-demand scenarios. These results reveal a systematic capability gap in current MLLMs' ability to infer contextual user demands. We hope ODU can establish the evaluation of a previously underexplored yet essential capability in multimodal interaction: correctly understanding user demands before generating an appropriate response.

Smart homes are evolving toward complex state-dependent living environments, requiring Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason over user intent, preferences, and multi-device interactions. However, existing smart-home benchmarks often focus on static instruction-to-API mapping or limited simulations, failing to evaluate whether LLMs can reason, interact, and act reliably in realistic household scenarios. To address these limitations, we introduce SMH-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs in smart-home environments. Built upon HomeEnv, an executable and verifiable smart-home simulator, SMH-Bench contains 1,100 high-quality tasks spanning 7 categories and 22 fine-grained subcategories. It further stratifies tasks across simple, medium and complex homes, ranging from small apartments to dense multi-room environments with 135 devices. Experiments show that although frontier LLMs achieve strong performance on explicit control and query tasks, they still exhibit significant weaknesses in automation task scheduling, ambiguity handling and personalized reasoning, especially as home complexity increases. We hope SMH-Bench will facilitate the development of more reliable, context-aware, and practically deployable smart-home agents.

Vision language models (VLMs) have been increasingly adopted in consumer smart-home camera systems to interpret recorded videos and provide insights. However, video clips captured from smart-home cameras are different from curated web videos dominating existing VLM benchmarks. Smart-home video clips often do not contain subtitles or narration and are captured from different viewing angles, under various lighting conditions, and in diverse scenarios. However, the capabilities of the model in this domain, under sparse visual signals and limited context, are not fully assessed by existing VLM benchmarks. To close this gap, we introduce OpenHome, a visual-only, four-option multiple-choice benchmark for evaluating smart-home video understanding. It contains 2,254 questions on 1,118 real-world video clips and organizes 10 tasks into three capability levels. Perception evaluates visible content, Reasoning evaluates causal, spatial, and temporal relationships, and Insight evaluates subject intent, supporting evidence and appropriate homeowner responses. Based on the dataset, we describe the task design, data pipeline and evaluation protocol, and report results for 32 closed-source and open-weight VLMs. The best model, Gemini 4 Argon, reaches 81.2% overall accuracy. Frontier closed-source models outperform open-weight models on every level. The best closed-source model leads the best open-weight model by 16.3% on Perception, 22.4% on Reasoning and 37.4% on Insight.