Offline Policy Evaluation via Mixed Bellman Residuals and Adaptive Critic Representations

Off-policy evaluation is a foundational component of offline reinforcement learning, aiming to assess and optimize policy performance using pre-collected datasets. However, such datasets often suffer from pronounced challenges, including distribution shift, $Q$-value overestimation, and low sample utilization efficiency. To address these issues, this paper introduces a weighted Bellman residual minimization framework that incorporates density ratio weighting by effectively integrating expert demonstrations with behavioral data. The proposed weighting scheme departs from the conventional completeness assumption commonly imposed in the theoretical analysis of deep reinforcement learning. We establish a sharp convergence rate for density ratio estimation and derive the convergence rate for the excess risk of resulting deep $Q^*$ estimator. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that, compared to existing methods, our method achieves significant improvements in numerical performance and policy generalization, providing specific guidance for the rational utilization of expert demonstrations.

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) has received increasing attention for learning policies from previously collected data without interaction with the real environment, which is particularly important in high-stakes applications. While a growing body of work has developed offline RL algorithms, these methods often rely on restrictive assumptions about data coverage and suffer from distribution shift. In this paper, we propose a residuals-based offline RL framework for general state and action spaces. Specifically, we define a residuals-based Bellman optimality operator that explicitly incorporates estimation error in learning transition dynamics into policy optimization by leveraging empirical residuals. We show that this Bellman operator is a contraction mapping and identify conditions under which its fixed point is asymptotically optimal and possesses finite-sample guarantees. We further develop a residuals-based offline deep Q-learning (DQN) algorithm. Using a stochastic CartPole environment, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our residuals-based offline DQN algorithm.

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) typically trains a critic by minimizing a regression loss against bootstrapped value targets stabilized by target networks with exponential moving average (EMA) updates. Multi-step targets incorporate behavior-policy actions and therefore require off-policy correction. We instead impose in-sample Bellman optimality on the critic through inequality constraints. We formulate the Lifted Bellman Linear Program (LBLP), which lifts the linear programming characterization of Bellman optimality to the joint $(Q,V)$ space so that every constraint involves only state-action pairs in the dataset. Its unique minimizer is the in-sample optimal pair, and constraints along $K$-step segments of dataset trajectories leave this minimizer unchanged for any rollout policy and horizon. Under deterministic dynamics, this minimizer lies between the best dataset return and the optimal value. Relaxing the constraints into hinge penalties recovers the same solution above a finite penalty coefficient in the tabular case. Approximate Lifted Bellman Unconstrained Minimization (ALBUM) implements this relaxation with neural networks and detaches the $K$-step rollout targets by stop gradient. Its objective contains no squared regression onto bootstrapped targets, so it can be trained without target networks or EMA updates. Under deterministic dynamics, the LBLP solution is a stationary point of the detached update under a coefficient condition independent of $γ$ and $K$, and the inequality constraints allow discounted returns along dataset trajectories to serve as lower bounds without off-policy correction or action chunking. On OGBench, ALBUM uses a single critic with a Gaussian policy, matches the average performance of FQL, and is comparable to recent action-chunking methods, while using the fewest parameters and the least peak GPU memory among all compared methods.