Verifying the Linear Representation Hypothesis: How Interpretable Are Vision SAEs?

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are increasingly used to extract interpretable concepts from vision and vision language models, yet existing evaluation methods largely rely on proxy metrics or qualitative inspection rather than measuring semantic correspondence. We present a human-grounded evaluation framework that quantifies alignment between SAE latents and human-annotated concepts, without requiring user studies, and validate this matching through targeted attribute perturbations. To enable this intervention-style evaluation in vision, we construct synCUB and synCOCO, synthetic benchmarks of paired images that differ in exactly one attribute. We introduce Fully-Binary Matching Pursuit (FBMP), a coalition-based matching procedure that supports many-to-one mappings between SAE latents and annotated concepts, and consistently outperforms one-to-one baselines. For functional validation, we propose a Targeted Attribute Perturbation Alignment Score (TAPAScore), which tests whether matched concepts respond selectively and in the expected direction under targeted image-level attribute perturbations. Under sanity checks, our matching and TAPAScore are the only evaluated metrics that reliably distinguish trained SAEs from untrained ones. Across SAEs trained on CLIP and DINOv2 embeddings, we find that increased overcompleteness can reduce perturbation alignment, indicating a reduction in interpretability. Our evaluation framework suggests that moderate dictionary sizes provide the best trade-off, yielding the most interpretable SAEs. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/JonasKlotz/sae-concept-eval.

Within Explainable Artificial Intelligence, mechanistic interpretability uses Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to extract more interpretable features from neural representations. However, assessing their monosemanticity, and thus explanation quality, remains challenging. Existing metrics require external concept labels or depend on pretrained embedding models, making them sensitive to encoder's geometry. We introduce the Tversky Monosemanticity Score (TMS), a label-free metric that operationalizes monosemanticity as activation-set coherence of binarized SAE latents, and does not require external embedding encoders. We evaluate TMS on SAEs trained on features from pretrained vision and vision-language models (DINOv3, CLIP, BLIP2), two common SAE regimes (TopK, BatchTopK), multiple sparsity levels, and expansion factors. Our results show that TMS is less affected by encoder anisotropy than its embedding-based alternative, while remaining aligned with established monosemanticity indicators. TMS also reveals distinct SAE training dynamics across base models. Moreover, under encoder anisotropy, TMS provides a stronger indication of probe-based concept deletion effectiveness, while being competitive otherwise.

Recent advances in language model interpretability using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have yet to effectively translate to the visual domain, mainly due to the difficulty and ambiguity of labeling visual concepts. In this paper, we introduce Visual Interpretability via SAE Transfer Alignment (VISTA), a framework that transfers interpretability from language to vision in a LLaVA-style vision-language model by constraining a visual projector to map visual tokens into an LLM's pre-existing, labeled textual SAE space. This approach enables visual interpretability without training dedicated vision SAEs. By regularizing the projector using the LLM's SAE reconstruction loss, VISTA achieves a threefold increase in the matching rate, which measures how accurately the most activating textual concepts in the SAE space correspond to semantic elements in the image. Using this framework, we further analyze spatial localization properties of different vision encoders and show that DINOv2 features have stronger localization abilities than other encoders. Leveraging this precision, we validate VISTA's cross-modal alignment through fine-grained, localized concept interventions, where specific objects are removed or replaced in the model's perception while preserving the surrounding scene. This results in improvements of 35% in object removal and 47% in object replacement tasks over vision-only baselines, providing causal evidence that visual tokens inhabit the text SAE manifold. These contributions are validated across multiple LLM architectures.