Learned Compression of SAR Phase-History Data: A Rate-Honest Feasibility Study on GOTCHA

Next-generation Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) missions will generate data far faster than they can downlink, making onboard data reduction essential for near-real-time Earth observation. Learned Image Compression (LIC) offers better rate-distortion performance than handcrafted codecs used operationally today, and recent work shows that simultaneously despeckling and compressing SAR imagery enables better representation capacity while unlocking higher compression rates. These methods, however, have yet to be confronted with the strict power, compute, and operational constraints of spaceborne systems. In this work, we bridge this gap by deploying a joint SAR Despeckling and Data Compression (DDC) framework on an embedded ZCU102 FPGA-based platform, introducing model adaptations that respect the accelerator's fixed-point arithmetic and limited set of supported operations. We evaluate four model topologies across precision levels and across CPU, GPU, and FPGA platforms, revealing several findings with direct design implications. We find that replacing conventional GDN activation functions with plain ReLU improves quality on SAR, suggesting that design principles established for compression of natural images do not necessarily transfer to SAR imagery. In addition, we demonstrate that residual blocks offer little representational benefit for ten times the compute, and show that the FPGA is the most energy-efficient of the platforms tested. Together, these results set a functioning edge deployment workflow and an evidence-based starting point for onboard SAR compression. The code is available at https://github.com/CedricLeon/SAR_DDC_FPGA.

Lossy compression is essential for massive spatiotemporal data from scientific simulations. Learned compressors can achieve high compression ratios at moderate accuracy targets, but their aggregate reconstruction losses do not guarantee accuracy for each block. Existing Guaranteed Autoencoder (GAE) methods add a per-block residual correction by retaining SVD/PCA-style coefficients until the target is met. This works at moderate tolerances, but in the high-fidelity regime with block-level NRMSE from 10^-6 to 10^-4, the number of retained coefficients grows quickly and the correction stream dominates the total rate. We propose a residual-centric view: the learned residual is structurally different from the original scientific field and should be coded with a representation designed for that residual. We introduce two residual coders. LBRC is a deterministic, training-free pipeline that adaptively quantizes the learned residual to the target NRMSE and losslessly encodes the resulting integer residual using 3D Lorenzo differencing, zigzag mapping, bit-plane coding, and entropy coding. NGLR adds a causal neural predictor that outputs a normalized bias for an integer-rounded Lorenzo prediction in the same deterministic integer pipeline, reducing the entropy of the remaining residual code while preserving deterministic decoding. The predictor weights are serialized and counted in the bitstream. Across E3SM, JHTDB, and ERA5 at block-level NRMSE targets from 10^-6 to 10^-4, LBRC improves compression ratio over GAE by 30-60% and is broadly competitive with SZ. NGLR adds a further 10-40% over LBRC and outperforms SZ in the evaluated high-fidelity regime. These results show that residual representations tailored to learned-compressor residuals can preserve the advantage of learned compression when global residual correction becomes rate-dominant.

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data is inherently complex-valued, while quantum machine learning (QML) models operate in complex Hilbert spaces. This similarity suggests that using both the magnitude and phase of SAR data in quantum encoding should help automatic target recognition in SAR images. In this study, we test this assumption by comparing five encoding strategies for quantum models: magnitude-only encoding, joint magnitude-phase encoding, in-phase and quadrature encoding, preprocessed phase encoding, and a purely quantum architecture. All approaches are evaluated under a unified experimental setup on the MSTAR benchmark dataset. Surprisingly, we find that magnitude-only encoding performs better than phase-inclusive encodings in hybrid quantum-classical models. It achieves 99.57 percent accuracy on the 3-class task and 71.19 percent accuracy on the 8-class task, outperforming complex-valued alternatives under the same framework. Adding phase information provides little or no improvement and can sometimes degrade performance. However, in purely quantum models with only 184 to 224 trainable parameters and no classical neural-network layers, phase information becomes much more important, improving accuracy by up to 21.65 percentage points. These findings show that the usefulness of phase information depends not only on the data, but also on the architecture used to process it. Hybrid models can compensate for missing phase information through their classical components, while pure quantum models rely more strongly on phase information for class discrimination. The results provide practical guidance for encoding complex-valued data in quantum machine learning and highlight the importance of jointly designing encoding strategies and model architectures for current quantum systems.