Factorized Scheduling Principle: Learning Interpretable and Transferable Policies via Structured Additive Functions

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has recently emerged as a promising approach to solve combinatorial optimization problems such as job shop scheduling. However, the policies learned by DRL are typically represented by deep neural networks (DNNs), whose opaque neural architectures and non-interpretable policy decisions can lead to critical trust and usability concerns for human decision makers. In addition, the computational requirements of DNNs can further hinder practical deployment in resource constrained environments. In this work, we propose ProRL, a novel interpretable programmatic reinforcement learning framework that achieves high-performance scheduling with human-readable and editable programmatic policies (i.e., programs). We first introduce a domain-specific language for scheduling (DSL-S) to represent scheduling strategies as structured programs. ProRL then explores the program space defined by DSL-S using local search to identify incomplete programs, which are subsequently completed by learning their parameters via Bayesian optimization. ProRL learns which scheduling heuristic rules to select, and hence, it naturally incorporates existing heuristics already used in industrial scenarios. Experiments on widely used benchmark instances demonstrate the strong performance of ProRL against existing heuristics and DRL baselines. Furthermore, ProRL performs well under strongly constrained computational resources, such as training with only 100 episodes. Our code is available at https://github.com/HcPlu/ProRL.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approaches for flexible job shop scheduling (FJSP) heavily rely on attention-centric architectures to achieve state-of-the-art performance. However, these models suffer from excessive parameter counts and prohibitive inference latency as problem scales expand. While liquid neural networks (LNNs) offer a parameter-efficient alternative for modeling adaptive state evolution, their inherently sequential dynamics bottleneck computational efficiency. To resolve this trade-off, we propose PLAN (Parallel Liquid-inspired Approximation Network), a lightweight representation learning framework that reformulates continuous liquid-state dynamics into a discretized and parallelizable formulation. PLAN structurally decouples state evolution from context aggregation, where liquid-inspired updates handle the primary evolving state representation, and a lightweight context aggregation module provides complementary global context. Furthermore, PLAN acts as a versatile, plug-and-play backbone that generalizes to complex FJSP variants, pairing with a compact stochastic module for stochastic FJSP and replacing heavy heterogeneous graph transformers in multi-faceted dynamic FJSP. Extensive evaluations across deterministic, stochastic, and multi-faceted dynamic FJSP benchmarks show that PLAN reduces the average makespan by 1.2%, 1.4%, and 2.3%, respectively, compared with the corresponding state-of-the-art baselines, with the improvement reaching 10.2% in one benchmark setting. PLAN also reduces average inference latency by 13.2%, 31.7%, and 26.9%, respectively, with a maximum reduction of 69.2% on the largest instances, while using only 22$-$47% of the baseline parameters.

Efficiently solving the Job Shop Scheduling Problem in real-world industrial applications requires policies that are both computationally lean and topologically robust. While Reinforcement Learning has shown potential in automating dispatching rules, existing models often struggle with a scalability bottleneck caused by quadratic graph complexity or the architectural overhead of heterogeneous layers. We introduce a unified graph framework that employs feature-based homogenization to project distinct node roles into a shared latent space. This allows a standard homogeneous Graph Isomorphism Network to capture complex resource contention with linear complexity, ensuring low-latency inference for large-scale industrial applications. Our empirical results demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance while exhibiting consistent zero-shot generalization. We identify the job-to-machine ratio as the primary driver of policy effectiveness, rather than absolute problem size. Based on this, we propose a hypothesis of structural saturation, demonstrating that policies trained on critically congested instances ($\mathcal{J} \approx \mathcal{M}$) learn scale-invariant resolution strategies. Agents trained at this saturation point internalize invariant conflict-resolution logic, allowing them to treat massive rectangular instances as a sequential concatenation of saturated sub-problems. This approach eliminates the need for expensive scale-specific retraining and prevents overfitting to statistical shortcuts, providing a robust and efficient pathway for deploying RL solutions in dynamic production environments.