ARGOS: Reinforcement Learning-Driven Multidimensional Elasticity for Service Orchestration in the Computing Continuum

A properly calibrated rule-based autoscaler can beat every one of six mainstream deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms on cost across every workload we test - so when, if ever, does DRL actually help? We study this in RLScale-Bench, a reproducible benchmark and evaluation protocol for DRL on adaptive resource control, where an agent allocates compute to a dynamic workload under cost and service-level constraints. We evaluate PPO, DQN, A2C, SAC, TD3, and DDPG under matched architectures, training budgets, and reward functions against a calibrated rule-based baseline across six workload patterns and five seeds (240 runs), instantiate the benchmark on Kubernetes Horizontal Pod Autoscaling, and probe distribution-shift generalization. Three findings challenge common assumptions: (i) the calibrated controller achieves the lowest cost on all six workloads, though it trails the best RL agents on bursty and flash traffic; (ii) discrete-action algorithms outperform continuous-action ones by one to two orders of magnitude in constraint violations due to action-space mismatch; and (iii) no single algorithm dominates across workloads, with rankings shifting by up to four positions. The bottleneck in RL-based resource control is not algorithm selection but baseline calibration, reward engineering, and realistic evaluation protocols.

Reinforcement learning for service orchestration has been the subject of sustained research for over a decade, yet it is not used in production at scale. The usual explanation is that learned controllers degrade under delayed and noisy telemetry, workload shifts, and uncontrolled tenants. We test whether existing evidence supports that explanation. We evaluate three highly influential RL-based orchestration systems spanning resource allocation, DAG scheduling, and autoscaling, using pre-registered predictions about comparative degradation under production-relevant perturbations and paired inference with family-wise error correction. Across the tests, most predicted performance reversals do not occur. Diagnostic analyses show that these outcomes often reflect comparator collapse, artefact limitations, or evaluation choices rather than evidence that learned controllers tolerate the perturbations. One apparent advantage under observation lag is roughly fortyfold compared to a Kubernetes HPA-equivalent controller. Another widely cited result cannot be reconstructed from its released artefact, and the strongest reproducible margin is far smaller than the published results. Conclusions also reverse under changes in perturbation magnitude and evaluation mode. Based on these results and broader patterns in the literature, we identify an institutional problem. Publication and review incentives favour benchmark gains against convenient comparators, even when those gains provide little evidence of deployment performance. We argue that the problem is not solely technical. Rather, it is institutional, so learned orchestration needs production-grade comparators, registered perturbation models, separate operational metrics, and publication criteria that reward reproducible operational evidence. Without these changes, the literature can grow without establishing whether learning improves orchestration.

In edge computing, the stochastic and bursty nature of serverless workloads challenges autonomous resource orchestration. Traditional reactive controllers, such as the Kubernetes Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA), suffer from reaction latency, leading to Service Level Objective (SLO) violations during traffic spikes and resource flapping during ramp-downs. While Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) offers a pathway toward proactive management, standard agents suffer from \textit{temporal blindness}, an inability to exploit the recent temporal context in non-Markovian edge environments. To bridge this gap, we propose a stability-aware autoscaling framework unifying short-horizon temporal context and control via an Attention-Enhanced Double-Stacked LSTM architecture integrated within a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) agent. Unlike shallow recurrent models, our approach employs a learned attention mechanism that weights recent historical states non-uniformly, suppressing high-frequency jitter while preserving the trend that precedes demand shifts. We validate the framework on two independent Kubernetes clusters using real-world Azure Functions traces. Against the single-layer LSTM ablation and the static HPA baseline, our approach reduces P90 latency by $\approx$67%, and holds average latency within the 50ms hard SLO for 98.8% of the run against 49.6% and 43.5% respectively. Against Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA), it matches latency performance at 75% fewer replica-steps and 59% less churn, with P90 hard-SLO violation bursts of at most 5 consecutive intervals against up to 24 for KEDA. These results indicate that mitigating temporal blindness through deep attentive memory improves the reliability and stability of Kubernetes autoscaling under bursty edge workloads.