PoE-Fuse: Precision-Weighted Expert Fusion for Bi-Temporal Change Understanding
Organizations: Neurogica Inc., Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
Bi-temporal change understanding, which localizes and characterizes what changed between two satellite images, is central to disaster response and environmental monitoring, spanning change detection, building localization, and damage assessment. Strong vision-language models address these tasks, but adapting them typically requires full fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, which is costly and unstable. We propose PoE-Fuse, a parameter-efficient framework that instead composes frozen foundation experts for geometry, grounding, and language, resampling their features onto a shared spatial grid and training only a lightweight fusion trunk. PoE-Fuse treats the aligned features as Gaussian observations of a latent scene state and fuses them by learned per-cell precision. This product-of-experts estimator strictly generalizes uniform summation and scalar gating, and extends to change fields by composing the precisions of the two timestamps. A single shared trunk solves the three tasks at once, reaching a mean F1 of 59.2%, compared with 40.7% for an instruction-tuned temporal vision-language assistant, and surpassing dedicated change-detection models retrained under the same protocol and training budget.
Figures & tables
| Expert | Role | Tokens | Layout |
|---|---|---|---|
| DINOv3-SAT [ 35 ] | Geometry / structure | Ordered grid (anchor) | |
| SAM 3 [ 3 ] | Text-conditioned grounding | Order-free queries | |
| Gemma 4 [ 11 ] | Language semantics | Order-free tokens |
| Task | Train | Eval | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| S2Looking change detection | 2,008 | 4,798 | per-pixel mask |
| xBD building localization | 627 | 6,322 | per-pixel mask |
| xBD damage classification | 607 | 6,322 | 5-way label |
Explore similar work
Finding Change in Satellite Archives from Text: How to Combine Before-and-After Images Efficiently
find the image pairs where a new building appeared.'' This means searching an archive of before-and-after (bi-temporal) satellite image pairs and ranking each pair by how well it matches a natural-language description of the change. The component that performs this match, the fusion module that combines the before'' and ``after'' views, must be run at query time across many candidate pairs, so its speed largely sets the cost of every search. We present a controlled comparison of how to build that module. Using one fixed image encoder (a frozen CLIP model) and one training recipe for all variants, we evaluate eight designs drawn from three families: attention, state-space models (Mamba), and learned compression (our Temporal Bottleneck Fusion, TBF). Each design is tested on two benchmarks (LEVIR-CC and Dubai-CC) with ten random seeds, so the reported differences are statistically grounded. We outline three findings: first, a training-free two-stage search (a cheap difference model that shortlists candidates, followed by attention fusion that re-ranks them) matches or exceeds full-fusion recall on LEVIR-CC while cutting query cost -, with comparable R@1/R@5 on Dubai-CC; second, the linear-time scan of Mamba, attractive on paper, gives no speed benefit at the patch counts typical of vision transformers (): the scan is limited by memory bandwidth, whereas attention maps cleanly onto parallel hardware; and third, compressing the fused representation (TBF) reduces parameters by and latency by for a change-only BLEU-1 cost of , although more aggressive compression quietly discards change-relevant detail that aggregate metrics fail to reveal.