EpiCon: Collective Agent Learning through Co-Evolving Multimodal Memory

Long-horizon agent interactions generate useful but noisy experience, and retraining models to absorb it is expensive. Context-evolving agents therefore need memory extraction methods that improve with more test-time compute without relying on gold labels. We propose RefCon, which combines sequential self-refinement with parallel self-contrast to extract higher-quality memories without gold labels. Evaluated on AppWorld and BFCL-V3 across multiple context-evolving agent frameworks, RefCon delivers strong and consistent gains, including relative improvements of 21.6% on ACE and 16.6% on ReMe over no-scaling baselines, while a diversity-focused variant (DivCon) achieves a 35.5% gain on ReasoningBank. RefCon consistently outperforms existing baselines without ground-truth labels, and generalizes across model scales and to software engineering tasks, where it surpasses even ground-truth baselines. We further analyze the accuracy-token trade-off and scaling behavior, showing RefCon maintains favorable efficiency and continues to improve as more trajectories are used, unlike diversity-only scaling which saturates earlier.

Multimodal large language models are increasingly deployed as long-horizon agents, where memory must do more than recall: it must track an evolving world, revise what has gone stale, and surface the right evidence at decision time. Existing benchmarks measure recall over static dialogue, collapse memory into a single end-of-task accuracy, and reduce visual observations to captions, leaving us unable to localize failures to writing, maintenance, retrieval, or use. The rise of agent harnesses that author their own memory sharpens this gap, since we have no principled way to compare hand-designed pipelines with self-managing alternatives. To close these gaps, we formulate multimodal agent memory as an Action-World Interaction Loop with an observable four-stage lifecycle, and instantiate it in WorldMemArena: 400 multi-session multimodal tasks spanning Lifelong Evolution (evolving personal and task states) and Agentic Execution (memory from real observations, actions, and feedback), annotated with gold memory points, updates, distractors, and evidence chains for stage-level diagnosis. This enables the first head-to-head comparison of long-context, manually designed (RAG and external memory systems), and harness-based memory agents. Results show that: (1) better memory writing and storage do not guarantee better performance; (2) multimodal memory still struggles to fully use visual evidence; (3) systems are unstable across domains and degrade on realistic agentic trajectories; and (4) harness memory is more flexible but remains costly and less reliable.

LLM agents rerun full reasoning for every task, even one they solved moments earlier. We introduce \textbf{APEX-EM}, a non-parametric experience memory that stores complete procedural-episodic traces in a typed Procedural Knowledge Graph (PKG) and retrieves them through three channels: semantic search, structural-signature matching over abstract operation sequences, and graph traversal. A Plan-Retrieve-Generate-Iterate-Ingest (PRGII) workflow produces, quality-gates, and commits experiences, indexing both successes and failures so the agent learns what to reuse and what to avoid. No weights change during deployment. We evaluate on five benchmarks: BigCodeBench, KGQAGen-10k, HLE, Lifelong Agent Bench, and ALFWorld. Because prior work uses different backbones, we base our claims on same-backbone comparisons that hold model capability fixed. On held-out BigCodeBench transfer with a shared GPT-4o backbone, APEX-EM gains +7.6,pp over the no-memory baseline, $3.3\times$ MemRL's +2.3,pp under the identical setup. On Lifelong Agent Bench with a shared GPT-4o-mini backbone, it gains +1.4,pp (OS) and +1.0,pp (DB) cumulative success. On KGQAGen-10k, frozen memory transfers to a blind 1{,}079-question test split at 73.7% versus 42.0% with no memory, approaching an oracle handed the ground-truth subgraph (84.9%). Across three Opus scales the memory gain stays at +27 to +32,pp, so it adds to model capability rather than substituting for it. Component analysis shows no single mechanism dominates: teacher feedback is negligible for code but adds +10.3,pp on structured queries, structural signatures give $3.3\times$ the transfer of semantic-only retrieval, and within-epoch iteration recovers most of the gain when rich feedback is unavailable. These results argue for modular memory composed per domain.