Quantifying the Value of Constructive Induction, Knowledge, and Noise Filtering on Inductive Learning

The fundamental theorem of statistical learning states that, under suitable measurability assumptions, finite Vapnik--Chervonenkis (VC) dimension guarantees that every proper consistent learning rule is probably approximately correct (PAC). Blumer, Ehrenfeucht, Haussler, and Warmuth showed, assuming the Continuum Hypothesis, that the "well-behavedness" condition of the concept class cannot be omitted: they constructed a concept class of Borel sets of VC dimension one admitting a consistent learning rule that is not PAC. We show that the Continuum Hypothesis is unnecessary. Working in Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC) alone, we construct a concept class of Borel sets on $[0,1]$ of VC dimension one and a proper consistent learning rule that is not PAC. More precisely, for a suitable Borel probability measure and target concept, the rule has true risk one at every sample size on a set of samples of outer probability one. Consequently, finite VC dimension and Borel measurability of the individual concepts do not suffice to guarantee that every proper consistent learning rule is PAC. The result shows, with no need of extra set-theoretical assumptions, that the additional regularity assumption in the fundamental theorem cannot in general be omitted.

In the realm of machine learning theory, to prevent unnatural coding schemes between teacher and learner, No-Clash Teaching Dimension was introduced as provably optimal complexity measure for collusion-free teaching. However, whether No-Clash Teaching Dimension is upper-bounded by Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension remains unknown. In this paper, for any finite concept class, we construct fragments of size equals to its Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension which identify concepts through an ordered compression scheme. Naturally, these fragments are used as teaching sets, one can easily see that they satisfy the non-clashing condition, i.e., this open question is resolved for finite concept classes.

We construct algorithms with optimal error for learning with adversarial noise. The overarching theme of this work is that the use of randomized hypotheses can substantially improve upon the best error rates achievable with deterministic hypotheses. - For $η$-rate malicious noise, we show the optimal error is $\frac{1}{2} \cdot η/(1-η)$, improving on the optimal error of deterministic hypotheses by a factor of $1/2$. This answers an open question of Cesa-Bianchi et al. (JACM 1999) who showed randomness can improve error by a factor of $6/7$. - For $η$-rate nasty noise, we show the optimal error is $\frac{3}{2} \cdot η$ for distribution-independent learners and $η$ for fixed-distribution learners, both improving upon the optimal $2 η$ error of deterministic hypotheses. This closes a gap first noted by Bshouty et al. (Theoretical Computer Science 2002) when they introduced nasty noise and reiterated in the recent works of Klivans et al. (NeurIPS 2025) and Blanc et al. (SODA 2026). - For $η$-rate agnostic noise and the closely related nasty classification noise model, we show the optimal error is $η$, improving upon the optimal $2η$ error of deterministic hypotheses. All of our learners have sample complexity linear in the VC-dimension of the concept class and polynomial in the inverse excess error. All except for the fixed-distribution nasty noise learner are time efficient given access to an oracle for empirical risk minimization.