Proprioceptive Sketches as Long-Horizon Intent for Generative Action Policies

Pretrained video generation models provide strong priors for robot control, but existing unified world action models still struggle to decode reliable actions without substantial robot-specific training. We attribute this limitation to a structural mismatch: while video models capture how scenes evolve, action generation requires explicit reasoning about where to interact and the underlying manipulation intent. We introduce AIM, an intent-aware unified world action model that bridges this gap via an explicit spatial interface. Instead of decoding actions directly from future visual representations, AIM predicts an aligned spatial value map that encodes task-relevant interaction structure, enabling a control-oriented abstraction of future dynamics. Built on a pretrained video generation model, AIM jointly models future observations and value maps within a shared mixture-of-transformers architecture. It employs intent-causal attention to route future information to the action branch exclusively through the value representation. We further propose a self-distillation reinforcement learning stage that freezes the video and value branches and optimizes only the action head using dense rewards derived from projected value-map responses together with sparse task-level signals. To support training and evaluation, we construct a simulation dataset of 30K manipulation trajectories with synchronized multi-view observations, actions, and value-map annotations. Experiments on RoboTwin 2.0 benchmark show that AIM achieves a 94.0% average success rate, significantly outperforming prior unified world action baselines. Notably, the improvement is more pronounced in long-horizon and contact-sensitive manipulation tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of explicit spatial-intent modeling as a bridge between visual world modeling and robot control.

Robot manipulation uses temporal context to select actions and visual foresight to assess their consequences, yet dense representations of past and future observations incur substantial processing costs. We introduce PACT-WAM, a world-action model that jointly generates a 16-step action trajectory and its temporally corresponding visual forecast through conditional flow sampling. Hierarchical history encoding assigns coarse spatial representations to earlier observations and finer representations to recent ones, retaining 16 observations with 256 tokens per view, 75% fewer than dense encoding of the same frames. A shared flow module jointly updates continuous action and visual states through two modality-specific heads under transition-wise causal attention, and a TiTok-VAE decoder reconstructs multi-view future images from the visual latents. Decoded forecasts also support Proposal Review (PR), a vision-language model component for execution-prefix selection and proposal rejection. Without PR, PACT-WAM achieves average success rates of 98.6%, 92.3%, and 78.0% on LIBERO, RoboTwin 2.0, and real-world Piper tasks, respectively. PR provides a test-time enhancement, raising these rates to 99.5%, 93.4%, and 86.7%. Ablations show that hierarchical history allocation and joint action-visual generation improve control success, while analyses of visual capacity and forecast-guided execution characterize the trade-offs between success and proposal-generation cost.

Generative visual models offer a foundation for learning representations of physical dynamics, yet their extension to continuous control raises a fundamental question: do visual prediction and action generation require separate computational pathways? Existing approaches usually introduce trainable action heads or separate action experts to bridge low-dimensional states and high-dimensional visual representations. In this work, we explore whether the visual backbone's existing capacity can also support control when actions are expressed in a compatible representation. Thus, we introduce PatchWAM (Patch World-Action Model), which treats continuous actions as another type of patch through a fixed mapping called Action-as-Patch. This allows a single model to predict both how the robot should move and what the scene may look like afterward. Visual prediction and action generation become parts of the same generative process, without a dedicated action head or separate action expert. Experiments with subsampled training windows show gains over a matched dual-expert control, while benchmark evaluations reach 91.8% success rate on LIBERO-Plus and 96.12% on RoboTwin 2.0 in a full-data setting with additional augmented demonstrations. More broadly, the result suggests that capability need not be added where it can be inherited: the constraint on extending a generative backbone is the interface a new signal is written in, not the capacity to model it.