math.OCOct 4, 2026

Near-Optimal Complexity of Finite-Sum Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization

Authors: Qihao Zhou

Organizations: Independent Researcher

Abstract

We characterize, up to logarithmic factors, the minimax expected query complexity of finite-sum nonconvex-strongly-concave optimization under mean-squared averaged smoothness. For randomized zero-respecting incremental first-order algorithms, the complexity is Θ~(n+min⁡{n κ,n3/4κ} LΔε−2)\tildeΘ(n+\min\{\sqrt{n}\,κ,n^{3/4}\sqrtκ\}\,LΔ\varepsilon^{-2}) throughout κ=L/μ≥1κ=L/μ\ge1, under exact dual initialization and for 0<ε2≤c0LΔ0<\varepsilon^2\le c_0LΔ, where c0>0c_0>0 is universal. This characterization is our main result. A dual-chain construction provides the lower bound and matches the existing Catalyst upper bound for κ≥nκ\ge\sqrt{n}. For 1≤κ≤n1\leκ\le\sqrt{n}, we introduce recursive proximal descent-ascent (RPDA), which retains a recursive gradient estimator across proximal subproblems and attains O~(n+n κLΔε−2)\tilde{O}(n+\sqrt{n}\,κLΔ\varepsilon^{-2}) with a fixed query budget. Both upper bounds guarantee an expected squared primal gradient at most ε2\varepsilon^2. Under individual smoothness, we also prove Ω(n+min⁡{κ,nκ} LΔε−2)Ω(n+\min\{κ,\sqrt{nκ}\}\,LΔ\varepsilon^{-2}) for every κ≥1κ\ge1. It matches the polynomial upper rate for a bilinear subclass when κ≥nκ\ge n; the intermediate-condition-number gap remains open.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Aug 30, 2026

Dense Weak Hiding: Closing Complexity Gaps in Nonconvex and PL Finite-Sum Optimization under Individual Smoothness

Under individual smoothness, known algorithms for nonconvex finite-sum optimization use O(n+nΔLmax⁡/ε2)O(n+\sqrt nΔL_{\max}/\varepsilon^2) incremental first-order oracle (IFO) calls, while existing lower bounds miss the factor n\sqrt n in the second term. We prove the matching lower bound Ω(n+nΔLmax⁡/ε2)Ω(n+\sqrt nΔL_{\max}/\varepsilon^2) for randomized IFO algorithms, allowing component indices and query points to depend on the complete preceding history. Thus PAGE and SPIDER are minimax optimal up to universal constants under individual and mean-squared smoothness. Under the global Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) condition, prior lower bounds did not capture the correct dependence on nn under individual smoothness, and the regime of small κκ remained open for randomized IFO algorithms. We prove an Ω(n+κmax⁡nlog⁡(Δ/ε))Ω(n+κ_{\max}\sqrt n\log(Δ/\varepsilon)) lower bound for κmax⁡≥nκ_{\max}\ge\sqrt n, and an Ω(n+nlog⁡(Δ/ε)/(1+log⁡(n/κmax⁡)))Ω(n+n\log(Δ/\varepsilon)/(1+\log(\sqrt n/κ_{\max}))) lower bound for 3≤κmax⁡≤n3\leκ_{\max}\le\sqrt n. Restarted PAGE attains matching upper bounds under mean-squared smoothness in terms of κms=Lms/μκ_{\rm ms}=L_{\rm ms}/μ. Our lower bounds use dense weak hiding. Each hidden direction is spread across all components, making individual queries weakly informative while preserving the direction in the average. A sufficiently large dimension makes premature activation of future stages unlikely within the query budget. Balancing the cost of revealing a stage against the number of stages permitted by individual smoothness yields the missing n\sqrt n factor.
Oct 1, 2026

Lower Bounds for Stochastic First-Order Algorithms with Variance Reduction in Nonconvex--Concave Minimax Optimization

We establish complexity lower bounds for stochastic first-order algorithms in nonconvex--concave minimax optimization, allowing algorithms to use variance reduction. Our main contribution is a lower bound for a zero-respecting algorithm class that permits variance reduction, extending beyond the algorithmic restrictions imposed by some existing lower bounds. We consider objectives with an LL-Lipschitz continuous joint gradient, a compact convex dual domain of Euclidean radius at most DYD_Y, and a primal value function, defined by maximizing the objective over the dual variable, with initial suboptimality at most ΔΔ. The target accuracy ε\varepsilon is measured by the gradient norm of the Moreau envelope of the constrained primal value function with parameter 1/(2L)1/(2L). Under an unbiased stochastic first-order oracle with variance at most σ2σ^2 and mean-square smoothness, we prove the lower bound Ω ⁣(L2DYΔε−3+L3DY2Δσ2ε−6)Ω\!\left(L^2D_YΔ\varepsilon^{-3}+L^3D_Y^2Δσ^2\varepsilon^{-6}\right). This result quantifies the dependence on accuracy, dual-domain radius, and oracle noise even when variance reduction is allowed. We also establish complementary lower bounds for nonconvex--strongly-concave minimax optimization. With dual strong-concavity parameter μ>0μ>0 and condition number κ:=L/μκ:=L/μ, we obtain Ω ⁣(LΔκ ε−2+LΔκσ2ε−4)Ω\!\left(LΔ\sqrtκ\,\varepsilon^{-2}+LΔκσ^2\varepsilon^{-4}\right) under the bounded-variance oracle model. Under the additional mean-square smoothness condition with constant Lˉ\bar L, we obtain Ω ⁣(LΔκ ε−2+ΔLˉσκ3/2ε−3)Ω\!\left(LΔ\sqrtκ\,\varepsilon^{-2}+Δ\bar Lσκ^{3/2}\varepsilon^{-3}\right). Together, these results identify complexity barriers across the concave and strongly concave regimes, with the main nonconvex--concave bound remaining valid for algorithms that use variance reduction.
Sep 25, 2026

Tight Stochastic Condition-Number Dependence in Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization

We study whether the linear condition-number dependence in the stochastic complexity of SAPD+ is necessary for nonconvex-strongly-concave minimax optimization. For jointly LL-smooth objectives with dual strong-concavity parameter μμ, we prove a lower bound that matches the SAPD+ upper bound under the same Moreau-envelope stationarity criterion and the same primal-dual initialization gap. Specifically, when σ≥εσ\ge\varepsilon, the worst-case complexity of zero-respecting algorithms is Θ(κLGσ2ε−4)Θ(κLGσ^2\varepsilon^{-4}) in the stated accuracy regime, where κ=L/μκ=L/μ, GG bounds the initial primal-dual gap, and σ2σ^2 bounds the variance of a general unbiased first-order oracle. The lower bound is realized on a smooth problem class with a bounded dual box. Our construction routes each link of a nonconvex zero-chain through a dual gradient of magnitude proportional to ε/κ\varepsilon/\sqrtκ, while an undiscovered primal coordinate prevents stationarity. It also yields the primal-gradient lower bound Ω(LΔ(κε−2+κσ2ε−4))Ω(LΔ(\sqrtκ\varepsilon^{-2}+κσ^2\varepsilon^{-4})) after combination with the known deterministic bound, where ΔΔ bounds the initial primal function gap.