Learning from imperfect teachers for low-resource acoustic generalization

Knowledge distillation transfers knowledge by encouraging a student to match a teacher's predicted class probabilities. These probabilities express not only confidence in the correct class, but also relations among incorrect alternatives. Yet closer imitation does not necessarily yield a better student. A student may already distinguish the correct class more sharply than its teacher, so further imitation can require giving back discrimination it has acquired. Our main result is an exact separation between full imitation and conditional learning. When the correct class's score advantage over each alternative must be preserved, full teacher-to-student KL minimization is blocked exactly when the student assigns no more probability than the teacher to every incorrect class. Crucially, the teacher's relative probabilities among incorrect classes remain fully learnable. We characterize the exact price of this transfer: a minimum increase in correct-class log-odds that compensates for the largest conditional-probability mismatch. Label fitting and conditional matching can therefore be completed even as full teacher KL diverges. This separation motivates task-preserving knowledge distillation (TPKD), which keeps the label gradient intact and minimally corrects the conditional gradient so that its output update preserves the label step's gains against every incorrect alternative. The corrected conditional direction retains more than half of the original first-order conditional descent at the same step size, with a tight bound. For a fixed positive conditional target and sufficiently small constant output steps, label and conditional errors vanish together. Experiments trace this learning from exact head updates to ordinary network training. TPKD reaches 88.05% accuracy on CIFAR-100 and 93.81% on CLINC150, improving over standard distillation by 0.47 and 0.35 percentage points across three seeds.

Knowledge Distillation (KD) and mixup have proven effective at inducing smoothness in class boundaries; KD captures inherent class relationships in probability distributions, and mixup enforces them through convex combinations of inputs. Their interaction, however, remains poorly understood, particularly when mixup is applied only during student training. In this setting, the teacher is queried on inputs drawn from a vicinal distribution it never saw during training, a controlled mismatch whose effect on knowledge transfer has not been characterised. We show that this mismatch causes the teacher's supervisory signal to be dominated by distributional confusion rather than inter-class structure. Despite it, the student does not merely imitate the teacher: it independently acquires greater linearity in the vicinal region, a structural property that the teacher lacks, and goes beyond dark-knowledge transfer. KD with mixup consistently improves student accuracy and reduces overconfidence by an order of magnitude relative to the baseline, across CIFAR and ImageNet with varying-capacity teachers. Crucially, calibration propagates from teacher to student independently of accuracy transfer, and temperature scaling governs a measurable accuracy-calibration trade-off that becomes more pronounced under vicinal training. These results reframe mixup distillation not as a degraded version of standard KD, but as a richer transfer channel that simultaneously shapes discriminative performance, uncertainty estimation, and representational geometry.

Knowledge Distillation (KD) is a central paradigm for transferring knowledge from a large teacher network to a typically smaller student model, often by leveraging soft probabilistic outputs. While KD has shown strong empirical success in numerous applications, its theoretical underpinnings remain only partially understood. In this work, we adopt a Bayesian perspective on KD to rigorously analyze the convergence behavior of students trained with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). We study two regimes: $(i)$ when the teacher provides the exact Bayes Class Probabilities (BCPs); and $(ii)$ supervision with noisy approximations of the BCPs. Our analysis shows that learning from BCPs yields variance reduction and removes neighborhood terms in the convergence bounds compared to one-hot supervision. We further characterize how the level of noise affects generalization and accuracy. Motivated by these insights, we advocate the use of Bayesian deep learning models, which typically provide improved estimates of the BCPs, as teachers in KD. Consistent with our analysis, we experimentally demonstrate that students distilled from Bayesian teachers not only achieve higher accuracies (up to +4.27%), but also exhibit more stable convergence (up to 30% less noise), compared to students distilled from deterministic teachers.