A BEMD-Based Quaternion Filtering Approach Sharp-to-Soft Kernel CT Image Conversion
Organizations: Sano Centre for Computational Medicine, Czarnowiejska 36/C5, Kraków, 30-054, Poland · Department of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland · Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Łojasiewicza 11, Kraków, 30-348, Poland · Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland
Abstract
The quality of computed tomography (CT) images is significantly affected by the selection of reconstruction kernels: sharp kernels improve spatial resolution but increase noise, whereas soft kernels diminish noise at the expense of edge clarity. This study presents an innovative enhancement framework utilising Bidimensional Empirical Mode Decomposition in conjunction with Quaternion Bilateral Filtering (BEMD--QBF) to convert sharp-kernel CT images into representations resembling soft-kernels, while maintaining critical anatomical structures. The technique disaggregates each image into intrinsic mode functions via BEMD and analyzes them inside a cohesive quaternion framework to attain efficient noise reduction and structural integrity. The proposed methodology is evaluated using several reconstruction kernels (B50, B46, B41, B36, B35, B31) and compared with recognised filtering strategies, including Non-Local Means, Anisotropic Diffusion, Bilateral Filtering, and Quaternion Bilateral Filtering. Quantitative evaluations of the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) indicate that BEMD-QBF consistently attains superior structural fidelity and competitive noise reduction across all evaluated kernels. The results underscore the efficacy of the proposed strategy as a viable approach to enhancing post-reconstruction CT images, yielding superior image quality without requiring access to raw projection data.
Figures & tables
| Method | Original Kernel | Bilateral Filter | NLM | Anisotropic Diffusion | QBF | BEMD–QBF |
| B50 | 0.834 | 0.963 | 0.846 | 0.979 | 0.932 | 0.965 |
| B46 | 0.962 | 0.989 | 0.962 | 0.974 | 0.960 | 0.983 |
| B41 | 0.971 | 0.963 | 0.846 | 0.979 | 0.976 | 0.965 |
| B36 | 0.980 | 0.976 | 0.980 | 0.956 | 0.962 | 0.961 |
| B35 | 0.988 | 0.977 | 0.988 | 0.950 | 0.972 | 0.968 |
| B31 | 0.987 | 0.988 | 0.986 | 0.964 | 0.973 | 0.972 |
| Method | Original Kernel | Bilateral Filter | NLM | Anisotropic Diffusion | QBF | BEMD–QBF |
| B50 | 29.40 | 32.74 | 30.37 | 33.91 | 23.36 | 29.64 |
| B46 | 30.57 | 34.87 | 30.58 | 37.70 | 27.16 | 40.79 |
| B41 | 35.04 | 30.15 | 35.04 | 27.30 | 38.42 | 26.94 |
| B36 | 43.40 | 37.16 | 43.42 | 32.39 | 38.91 | 30.65 |
| B35 | 32.25 | 28.34 | 32.26 | 25.96 | 36.26 | 25.90 |
| B31 | 44.53 | 36.06 | 44.53 | 31.36 | 33.74 | 30.71 |