Can We Model the Artifacts Explicitly? Disentangle Artifacts via Pairwise Edit Relations for Image Manipulation Localization

With the rapid evolution of synthetic media, Image Manipulation Localization (IML) has emerged as a critical component in multimedia forensics for ensuring the integrity of digital content. However, generalization remains a core challenge, as existing discriminative methods typically learn a fixed decision boundary that tends to overfit to specific training artifacts and fails to adapt to unseen manipulation types. To address this, we propose DiffIML, a novel framework that introduces score-based generative modeling to IML. Diverging from the direct estimation of hard boundaries, DiffIML approximates the score function, the gradient of the log-likelihood, to capture the intrinsic geometric topology of mask distributions. This paradigm leverages structural priors to iteratively recover coherent masks from noise, thereby circumventing the brittleness associated with discriminative models. Under this formulation, diffusion models serve as an effective numerical solver for the learned score function.To ensure practicality, we respectively resolve the efficiency and stability bottlenecks of standard diffusion by: (1) utilizing a Lightweight Mask-Specific VAE for fast latent-space process and a decoupled architecture with a lightweight denoising UNet, (2) edge supervision and error prior to mitigate error accumulation during sampling. Extensive experiments of two distinct protocols on eight non-generative and three generative benchmarks demonstrate that DiffIML consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, yielding remarkable generalization improvements on diverse unseen datasets. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/scu-zjz/DiffIML.

Although some existing image manipulation localization (IML) methods incorporate authenticity-related supervision, this information is typically utilized merely as an auxiliary training signal to enhance the model's sensitivity to manipulation artifacts, rather than being explicitly modeled as localization evidence opposing the manipulated regions. Consequently, when manipulation traces are subtle or degraded by post-processing and noise, these methods struggle to explicitly compare manipulated and authentic evidence, resulting in unreliable predictions in ambiguous areas. To address these issues, we propose a courtroom-style adjudication framework that regards IML task as the confrontation of evidence followed by judgment. The framework comprises a prosecution stream, a defense stream, and a judge model. We first build a dual-hypothesis segmentation architecture on a shared multi-scale encoder, in which the prosecution stream asserts manipulation and the defense stream asserts authenticity. Guided by edge priors, it produces evidence for manipulated and authentic regions through cascaded multi-level fusion, bidirectional disagreement suppression, and dynamic debate refinement. We further develop a reinforcement learning judge model that performs strategic re-inference and refinement on uncertain regions, yielding a manipulated-region mask. The judge model is trained with advantage-based rewards and a soft-IoU objective, and reliability is calibrated via entropy and cross-hypothesis consistency. Experimental results show that our model achieves superior average performance compared with SOTA IML methods.

Text-driven image editing has advanced rapidly, but reliably localizing these manipulations requires image manipulation localization (IML) models trained on large pixel-annotated datasets, and there is still no low-cost way to obtain such training data at scale. We observe that these data already exist in disguise: public editing datasets contain millions of structurally identical (original, edited) pairs to IML training samples, lacking only pixel-level masks. Recovering these masks automatically is non-trivial: pixel differencing is overwhelmed by diffusion-induced perturbations across all pixels, and instruction-only grounding localizes only what the prompt describes, missing unintended editor side-effects. We propose SIGMA (Semantic-difference Instruction-Grounding Mask Annotator), which performs semantic-feature differencing in a vision foundation backbone and injects an instruction-derived spatial prior into this visual stream via bidirectional cross-modal refinement, amplifying the difference signal at intended-edit regions when the editor faithfully realizes user intent. SIGMA is trained in two complementary stages: Stage I supervises on inpainting masks; Stage II closes the diffusion-domain shift via VAE-roundtrip noise calibration, EMA self-training, and an edit-noise disentanglement loss. SIGMA outperforms existing automatic mask generators on five benchmarks (+12.20% F1, +11.16% IoU). When applied to public editing corpora, it produces a ~1.1M IML training set that improves six diverse detectors by +18.34% F1 across five datasets, turning previously unused editing data into a model-agnostic supervisory resource for IML. We'll release the full codebase as soon as the paper is accepted.