A Broader Look at Model Merging: Rethinking Implicit Regularization Induced by Task Arithmetic

Modern deep learning usually treats models as separate artifacts: trained independently, specialized for particular purposes, and replaced when improved versions appear. This thesis studies model merging as an alternative paradigm: combining independently trained neural networks directly in weight space, with little or no optimization and without requiring access to the original training data. The thesis considers two main regimes. In the single-task setting, where models share an objective but differ in initialization, we introduce C$^2$M$^3$, a cycle-consistent merging algorithm based on Frank-Wolfe optimization. C$^2$M$^3$ aligns multiple networks into a shared, reference-free parameter space, making weight averaging meaningful without privileging any individual model. In the multi-task setting, where models are fine-tuned for different downstream tasks from a common pretrained initialization, we first develop a theoretical account of task vectors as approximate gradients. This explains both the effectiveness and the limitations of task arithmetic. Building on this view, we show that task vectors inherit the low-rank structure of gradients and introduce Task Singular Vectors (TSV), a decomposition that enables compression and interference reduction through TSV-Merge. We then present MASS, an input-adaptive routing method that uses TSV geometry to select task-relevant subspaces at inference time. Finally, we introduce MERGE$^3$, an evolutionary merging framework that uses Item Response Theory to reduce evaluation costs by up to 50$\times$ while preserving solution quality. Together, these contributions provide theoretical and algorithmic foundations for model merging, supporting a paradigm in which learned capabilities can be composed, reused, and extended across models.

Model merging aims to combine multiple task-specific expert models into a single model without joint retraining, offering a practical alternative to multi-task learning when data access or computational budget is limited. Existing model merging methods rarely exploit strong merged models as priors for further improvement. To address this limitation, we propose ReForge, a bilevel optimization framework that formulates module-wise refinement as Bayesian linear regression with an anchor-centered prior. The inner level yields a closed-form MAP estimate from unlabeled calibration activations. The outer level uses Bayesian optimization to jointly select heterogeneous regularization strengths and assembly scales using held-out validation data. Furthermore, we develop a data-free variant of ReForge that replaces activation statistics with task-vector Grams, eliminating the need for calibration examples. Across extensive benchmarks, including up to 20-task merging in vision and 5-task merging in language, ReForge consistently outperforms all evaluated plug-and-play anchor baselines (e.g., TA, WUDI-Merging, and TSV). On 20-task ViT-B/32, ReForge improves the strongest evaluated baseline, ISO-CTS, from 77.6% to 82.8% in the data-assisted setting and to 81.5% in the data-free setting. On eight-task ViT-L/14, the data-assisted variant achieves 95.1% mean accuracy, compared with 95.8% for the individual task experts. Our source code will be released soon.

Model merging has emerged as a training-free alternative to multi-task learning, aiming to combine multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model. Most existing model merging approaches follow the Task Arithmetic paradigm, which decomposes fine-tuned weights into pre-trained parameters and task vectors, and performs merging exclusively in the task-vector space. The effectiveness of this paradigm implicitly relies on the assumption that task-specific knowledge is encoded solely within task vectors. We argue that this assumption generally does not hold due to the intrinsic task preferences of pre-trained models. Specifically, we identify \textbf{Load-Bearing Wall (LBW) dimensions}, namely some task-critical knowledge that remains embedded in the pre-trained weights rather than being fully transferred into task vectors. We characterize LBW dimensions from both scalar-weight and subspace perspectives, thereby covering the major paradigms of existing model merging methods. Our analysis reveals that, by ignoring LBW dimensions, task-vector-based approaches fail to fully resolve task conflicts and may inadvertently damage task-specific knowledge encoded in the pre-trained model, leading to degradation. To address this issue, we propose PACT, which preserves the anchored task-specific cores (i.e., LBW dimensions) within task vectors by aligning their orthogonal complements with the subspace of the pre-trained weights. These aligned subspace components are then removed from the task vectors before applying existing model merging algorithms. Furthermore, we develop an efficient variant based on randomized SVD to improve scalability. PACT can be seamlessly integrated with existing methods. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that PACT consistently enhances mainstream model merging approaches and establishes new state-of-the-art performance.