Mu-DisCoCat: A Variational Pipeline for Compositional Generalization on Quantum Processors

Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are a leading approach to quantum machine learning on near-term devices, yet it remains unclear which circuit architecture yields the best accuracy-parameter trade-off on classical tabular data. We present a systematic empirical comparison of four VQC families -- multi-layer fully-connected (FC-VQC), residual (ResNet-VQC), hybrid quantum-classical transformer (QT), and fully quantum transformer (FQT) -- across five regression and classification benchmarks. Our key findings are: \textbf{(i)}~FC-VQCs achieve 90-96% of the $R^2$ of attention-based VQCs while using 40-50% fewer parameters, and consistently outperform equal-capacity MLPs (mean $R^2{=}0.829$ vs.\ MLP$_{720}$'s $0.753$ on Boston Housing, 3-seed average); \textbf{(ii)}FC-VQC's Type4 inter-block connectivity provides partial cross-token mixing that approximates the role of attention -- explicit quantum self-attention yields only marginal gains on most datasets while significantly increasing parameter count; \textbf{(iii)}expressibility saturates at circuit depth${\approx}\,3$, explaining why shallow VQCs already cover the Hilbert space effectively; \textbf{(iv)}~LayerNorm on the fully quantum transformer improves classification accuracy, suggesting normalization is important when all operations are quantum; \textbf{(v)}~in our noise study on Boston Housing, FQT degrades gracefully under depolarizing noise while QT collapses. All results are validated across three random seeds. These findings provide practical architectural guidance for deploying VQCs on near-term quantum hardware.

Most multimodal learning methods improve how heterogeneous representations are aligned and fused, while post-fusion enhancement remains less explored. We propose Parallel Quantum Feature Augmentation (PQFA), a hybrid quantum-classical framework that applies multiple shallow variational quantum circuits to fused multimodal features. Text and image representations extracted by frozen RoBERTa and ViT encoders are processed through bidirectional cross-attention, attentive pooling, and adaptive gated fusion. The fused feature is then amplitude-encoded into parallel quantum circuits, whose measurement readouts are concatenated with the classical representation for prediction. We evaluate PQFA on MM-IMDb and N24News through controlled comparisons using the same encoders, fusion backbone, data splits, projection dimension, and augmentation output width. PQFA consistently outperforms both the fusion backbone without quantum augmentation and a width-matched MLP augmentation baseline, while using approximately 2.2K augmentation parameters compared with 24.0K for the MLP branch. Missing-modality experiments further show improved robustness when textual or visual inputs are incomplete, with particularly clear gains when the more informative textual modality is severely degraded. Controlled ablations and feature-space analyses indicate that the improvement cannot be reproduced by random feature mappings, increased classical width, or untrained quantum transformations. Quantum-state diagnostics additionally show stable predictive performance across the tested simulated noise levels and distinct branch-specific transformations of the encoded states. These results establish PQFA as an effective and parameter-efficient strategy for post-fusion augmentation in hybrid quantum-classical multimodal learning.

Generative models have become central across science and industry, from image and text synthesis to the design of molecules and materials. Quantum generative models are considered one of the most promising applications for quantum computers, since a quantum circuit naturally produces samples from the distribution it encodes, and for suitable circuits that distribution is believed to be hard for any classical computer to reproduce. A leading strategy trains these models on a classical computer and reserves the quantum device for generating samples at deployment. This is possible when the training loss can be evaluated on a classical computer. A prime example is the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD$^2$), a moment-matching loss that compares the model and the data through their Pauli-$Z$ correlations. Research so far has asked whether such models can be trained and whether their sampling is hard; whether minimizing such an objective yields a model that \emph{generalizes}, rather than one that merely reproduces the training statistics, remains poorly understood. We benchmark thirteen quantum and classical generative models by direct sampling on two application-inspired datasets: first a cardinality-constrained dataset at up to $30$ qubits and second a dataset of genomic single-nucleotide variants, whose valid set is the observed data. Models that converge the loss to the same value differ widely in how much of the unseen valid set they cover. These results indicate that a converged moment-matching loss is not a reliable measure of generalization, and that a train-classical, deploy-quantum workflow has to measure generalization by sampling the trained model, a step that at the sizes of interest is believed to require the quantum device.