An extended deep energy method for thermo-mechanical crack propagation
Organizations: University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia · Central Queensland University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia · Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Weimar, Germany
Abstract
Thermo-mechanical fracture couples transient heat conduction on a cracked domain with a crack that grows as the temperature and the displacement evolve. Neural energy solvers have been proposed for phase-field fracture and later extended to represent a sharp crack through the network input, but heat conduction on the cracked domain and crack propagation under the resulting thermal stresses have not yet been treated together in these solvers. We present an extended deep energy method for thermo-mechanical crack propagation in which the crack remains a sharp polyline. Two networks represent the temperature and the displacement and receive the crack through a scalar embedding function, discontinuous across the crack and smooth elsewhere, so that both fields can jump across it without a regularization length, and the displacement is enriched near the tip by the Williams expansion with trainable amplitudes. The two fields are obtained by minimizing an incremental conduction functional and the thermoelastic potential energy in a staggered sequence, with Monte Carlo integration on points stratified over background elements, densified near the tip and redrawn during training. The stress intensity factors are extracted by the interaction integral with the area term of Wilson and Yu and checked by a sweep of the contour radius, and the crack advances at the maximum hoop stress angle when the energy release rate of the kink reaches the critical value at the crack-tip temperature. On a stationary thermal edge crack the extracted stress intensity factor agrees with the published value to 0.11%, in a functionally graded shear test initiation agrees with an independent sharp-crack finite element solution to within one load step, and on a notched cruciform specimen the crack paths follow the published solutions under mechanical, thermal and combined loading.
Figures & tables
| Symbol | Meaning | Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| , | body, cracked domain | crack embedding function | |
| crack faces | crack-aware network input | ||
| , | displacement, temperature | , | network parameters |
| , , | total, elastic, thermal strain | , | trainable enrichment amplitudes |
| , | stress, elastic energy density | , | tip polar frame, tangent angle |
| , , | density, specific heat, conductivity | , , | extracted SIFs, -integral |
| Parameter | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Young’s modulus | ||
| Poisson’s ratio | ||
| Critical energy release rate | ||
| Density | ||
| Thermal conductivity | ||
| Specific heat capacity |
| Parameter | Symbol | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Young’s modulus | |||
| Poisson’s ratio | |||
| Critical energy release rate | |||
| Density | |||
| Thermal conductivity | |||
| Specific heat capacity |
| Parameter | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Young’s modulus | ||
| Poisson’s ratio | ||
| Fracture energy | ||
| Tensile strength | ||
| Thermal expansion coefficient | ||
| Density |
| Solution | Crack | Method | Load | ( ) | Plane | Used in | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang [ 89 ] | sharp | meshfree | traction | – | I, II | ||
| Nguyen et al. [ 88 ] | sharp | enriched elements | traction | – | I, II | ||
| Chen et al. [ 90 ] | sharp | smoothed elements | traction | strain | I, II, F | ||
| Greco et al. [ 91 ] | sharp | moving mesh | traction | strain | I, II, F | ||
| Mandal et al. [ 37 ] | phase field | finite elements | displacement | stress | I, II, III | ||
| Chen et al. [ 92 ] | phase field | scaled boundary elements | displacement | – | I, II, III |
| Case | Proposed method | Published | Outside the published span |
|---|---|---|---|
| I, mechanical | ( to ) | to | to above |
| II, thermal | ( to ) | to | to below |
| III, both | ( to ) | and | to below |
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Stationary crack | Tension | Graded shear | Cruciform | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section 6.1 | Section 6.2 | Section 6.3 | Section 6.4 | |
| Background elements across the width | 48, 72, 96 | 100 | 100 | 150 |
| Resampling interval | none | 500 iterations | 500 iterations | 500 iterations |
| Displacement network | 3–50–50–50–2 | 3–50–50–50–2 | 3–50–50–50–2 | 3–50–50–50–2 † |
| Adam iterations per load step, thermal / mech. | 8000 | 3000 / 3000 | 3000 / 3000, 5000 / 5000 at step 1 | 2000 / 3000 |
| Unloaded step 0, Adam then L-BFGS, thermal / mech. | – | 5000 / 7000, then 2500 / 3000 | 3000 / 3000, then 3000 / 1500 | 5000 / 7000, then 2500 / 3000 |
| Proposed method | 40 | 45 | 51 |
| Proposed method, repeat | 41 | 47 | 51 |
| Sharp-crack finite elements | 41 | 46 | 51 |
| Phase field | 46 | 51 | 56 |
| Variation | Peak | First growth | Extensions |
| Baseline | N | step | |
| Repeat, integration point draw resampled | |||
| Increment halved to mm, contour at elements | no growth | – | |
| Increment doubled to mm, radii | |||
| Increment doubled, contour pinned at mm | |||
| Both networks narrowed to width |
| Case | Run | Extensions | Sweep refusals | Convergence | Released, extended | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| drift | no contour | refusals | ||||
| I | reported | 14 | 6 | 37 | 0 | 0, 0 |
| I | repeat 1 | 14 | 16 | 37 | 0 | 0, 0 |
| I | repeat 2 | 15 | 7 | 36 | 0 | 1, 1 ∗ |
| II | reported | 7 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2, 0 |
| II | repeat 1 | 7 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3, 0 |