Data Reuse in Non-Stationary Learning

This paper investigates non-stationary online learning using the metric of interval regret, which requires an online algorithm to perform well over every time interval. We propose the first online learning algorithm that achieves an interval regret bound scaling with gradient variation, a fundamental measure of the cumulative change in online function gradients, which relates to various problem-dependent quantities and is closely connected to stochastic optimization and other problems. Our method employs a simple and efficient two-layer online ensemble structure that achieves strong theoretical guarantees. Specifically, it enjoys a regret bound that simultaneously adapts to various problem-dependent quantities while also preserving the minimax-optimal rate in the worst case. Moreover, recognizing the challenge of hyperparameter tuning, we introduce a Lipschitz- and smoothness-agnostic variant that automatically adapts to these potentially unknown constants. This is primarily enabled by a novel Lipschitz-adaptive meta algorithm, which may be of independent interest. Beyond interval regret, our method also yields broader implications: it provides versatile bounds for interval dynamic regret, a stronger measure that competes with changing comparators over any interval, and yields the first piecewise characterization for stochastic extended adversarial optimization. Theoretical findings are validated by experiments.

We study online learning with an additional offline dataset in the stochastic linear bandit setting. Although this problem arises frequently in practice, the offline-to-online tradeoff remains poorly understood in structured environments. We propose a linear bandit algorithm that balances this tradeoff: it relies on offline data during early rounds, and increasingly favors exploration as the horizon grows. We establish regret bounds showing that our method is simultaneously competitive with both purely online and purely offline solutions. In particular, it achieves sublinear regret relative to the optimal action in the number of online interactions, while its regret relative to an offline reference decreases as the number of offline samples grows. Empirical results further demonstrate its effectiveness across various problem parameters.

Continual learning that is gradient-free, local, online, and append-only is attractive for edge and streaming deployment, but its value is usually argued informally. We give a provable account on recurring-regime streams. Given segmentation, a warm-start library learner attains amortized recovery cost $O\!\big(KD/\varepsilon^2+(R-K)\logK/Δ^2\big)$ versus a memoryless re-estimator's $Θ(RD/\varepsilon^2)$, an advantage $(R-K)\,Θ(D/\varepsilon^2)$ growing with dimension $D$ and recurrence density. The mechanism is a decoupling: recognizing which of $K$ seen regimes is active costs $O(\log K/Δ^2)$, independent of $D$, whereas estimating a regime costs $Θ(D/\varepsilon^2)$. We prove this is tight: matching lower bounds give recognition $Θ(\log K/Δ^2)$ and a memoryless-class bound $Ω(RD/\varepsilon^2)$, so each term is individually minimax-tight (the joint statement is conditional). The separation is born-immune (a memoryless learner's advantage is identically zero) and paradigm-level: it matches, and does not beat, a fair spawn-capable Bayesian baseline; the contribution is attaining this cost structure without end-to-end backprop and with zero forgetting by construction. A count-calibrated variant ties the baseline's leading constant up to a bounded, never-negative per-recurrence overshoot, hyperparameter-free and with no per-step transcendentals. We bound the scope: recognizable regimes are capped by simplex packing (walls $e^{Θ(D)}$); autonomous segmentation is impossible at the packing wall (no detector escapes the false-alarm/delay frontier as regimes overlap); the advantage vanishes under overlap. The dimension-dependent separation is corroborated on synthetic streams and real $k$-mer genome distributions (memoryless cost $\propto D^{1.04}$, recognition $D$-independent); the one real sequential stream sits in the $D{=}1$ near-null corner.