cs.SDOct 8, 2026

Cross-Lingual Speaker Verification with Self-Supervised Pre-Trained Models

Authors: Jinghan Peng, Yu Zheng, Weiqiang Wang, Jian Liu

Organizations: Machine Intelligence, Ant Group, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Speaker verification (SV) performance degrades under language mismatch due to the entanglement of speaker identity with language-specific acoustic cues. To address this problem, we leverage large-scale self-supervised pre-trained models (PTMs) to learn language-agnostic speaker representations. We utilize PTMs as robust front-end feature extractors, capitalizing on their rich acoustic and linguistic knowledge acquired from vast, diverse audio data. These generalized features are then used to train a downstream speaker embedding network, effectively disentangling speaker identity from language-specific characteristics. We validate our approach on the TidyVoice2026 benchmark, which benchmarks SV under language mismatch. Our proposed system (team T02) achieves equal error rates (EERs) of 2.21% on tv26_eval-A and 2.99% on tv26_eval-U.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Jul 24, 2026cs.CL

Simple Language Normalization Wins: Cross-Lingual Speaker Verification for the TidyVoice 2026 Challenge

Cross-lingual mismatch remains a key source of overall degradation in modern speaker verification. The TidyVoice2026 Challenge targets this setting with text-independent verification, comprising 3,666 training and 808 development speakers in 40 languages and 2,200 evaluation speakers in 38 unseen languages, without language labels at test time. Starting from the official SimAM-ResNet34 baseline pretrained on VoxBlink2 and VoxCeleb2 and fine-tuned on TidyVoice, we revisit Nuisance Attribute Projection (NAP) as a simple language-normalization step in the embedding space. We estimate a compact language subspace from cross-language same-speaker differences and project embeddings onto its orthogonal complement before cosine scoring with Adaptive Symmetric score normalization. This reduces development EER from 2.97% with cosine and 2.70% with AS-Norm to 2.18% and yields a Codabench evaluation score of 8.40, showing that simple back-end language normalization can rival more complex systems.
Jun 16, 2026cs.SD

L-Proto: Language-Aware Episodic Prototypical Training for Multilingual Speaker Verification

Multilingual speaker verification remains challenging because language-dependent acoustic variability causes speaker identity to become entangled with linguistic characteristics, degrading generalization across languages. In multilingual training, embeddings often encode language cues with speaker identity, causing speakers to form language-specific clusters. We propose L-Proto, a language-aware episodic prototypical training strategy that constructs language-consistent episodes. By sampling speakers from a single language per episode, L-Proto reduces language-driven variation during training and encourages embeddings to focus more directly on speaker identity. Experiments on the TidyVoice Challenge benchmark demonstrate consistent performance improvements over conventional fine-tuning and random episodic sampling across multiple backbone architectures.
Jul 1, 2026eess.AS

Disentangling Speaker and Language Effects in Cross-Lingual Speaker Verification for Iberian Languages

Cross-lingual speaker verification (SV) systems typically exhibit performance degradation when enrollment and test utterances are spoken in different languages. However, standard evaluation protocols confound language mismatch with inter-speaker variability, as evaluation is generally performed with different speakers across languages. In this work, we introduce a bilingual same-speaker evaluation set for five Iberian languages, enabling analysis of cross-lingual SV under constant speaker identity. We apply this setup to a HuBERT-based SV system previously shown to exhibit strong language dependence, and analyze results using the Cross-Lingual Transfer Matrix (CLTM) to study pairwise cross-lingual transfer. Our results show that speaker-related variability accounts for part of the observed degradation, but language mismatch remains the main driver of cross-lingual performance loss. These findings provide a more precise characterization of language dependence in cross-lingual SV.