Referring Audio--Visual Segmentation (Ref-AVS) is an emergent multimodal task requiring the precise identification and segmentation of a specific object based on a natural language expression grounded in both visual and auditory cues. Unlike traditional AVS, which segments generic sound sources, or referring video object segmentation (Ref-VOS), which relies solely on visual--textual grounding, Ref-AVS necessitates fine-grained tri-modal interaction across vision, audio, and language. However, existing methods often fail to maintain consistency when subjected to target shift, a phenomenon where the model erroneously transfers its focus between objects due to transient occlusions, acoustic fading, or identity ambiguities. To address this, we propose a novel Shift-Aware Identity-guided Latent (SAIL) refinement framework. It introduces a dual-token strategy that decouples frame-level dynamics from a global semantic anchor to explicitly model target-shift cues. We design a shift-aware refinement module that rectifies drift by aligning tokens with domain-specific evidence. Finally, we leverage a decoder that integrates the refined embeddings with a continuous memory update to maintain spatio-temporal coherence and identity consistency throughout the video sequence. Extensive experiments conducted on two Ref-AVS benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, significantly outperforming existing AVS, Ref-VOS, and Ref-AVS approaches. The code will be released after publication.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Illustration of Ref-AVS and target shift problems. (a) Given a tri-modal input (audio, video, and expression), a Ref-AVS model performs sequential mask prediction for the referred object. (b) Visual target shift caused by transient occlusion or overshadowing ( e.g. , shifting from the accordion to a guitar). (c) Auditory target shift caused by intermittent sound fading or pauses ( e.g. , shifting from the cello to a piano).
Figure 2: Overview of the proposed SAIL framework. Our MLLM with LoRA [ 11 ] reasons over the unified tri-modal tokens, generating frame-level [seg] tokens for local dynamics and a global [query] token as a semantic anchor. The shift-aware refinement module estimates and rectifies the latent shift by comparing the domain-specific evidence with the anchor’s semantics. The mask decoder utilizes the refined embeddings and a memory mechanism to generate consistent mask predictions for the entire video sequence. For brevity, projection units before the decoder are omitted.
Method
Task
Model
Seen ↑
Unseen ↑
Mix ↑
Null ↓
J
F
J
F
J
F
S
AVSBench [ 53 ] eccv22
AVS
PVT-v2
23.2
51.1
32.4
54.7
27.8
52.9
0.208
AVSegFormer [ 8 ] aaai24
PVT-v2
33.5
47.0
36.1
50.1
34.8
48.6
0.171
GAVS [ 42 ] aaai24
SAM
28.9
49.8
29.8
49.7
29.4
49.8
0.190
SAMA [ 25 ] wacv24
SAM
39.2
56.2
47.5
56.6
43.4
56.4
0.130
ReferFormer [ 45 ] cvpr22
Ref-VOS
Video-Swin
31.3
50.1
30.4
48.8
30.9
49.5
0.176
Table 1: Comparison with existing methods on Ref-AVSBench [ 43 ] , where Mix represents the mean performance of Seen and Unseen subsets. † denotes methods requiring additional data for instruction tuning; ‡ indicates models that further necessitate external components in multiple stages. The best results are bold while the second best are underlined .
Figure 3: Qualitative results of SAIL and baseline from Ref-AVSBench [ 43 ] .
Method
Seen ↑
Unseen ↑
Mix ↑
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
EEMC [ 43 ] eccv24
22.6
39.9
31.2
38.7
56.9
47.8
30.6
48.4
39.5
Grounded-SAM2 [ 34 ] arxiv24
21.4
30.1
25.7
44.9
53.4
49.1
33.2
41.7
37.4
Crab [ 6 ] cvpr25
19.6
32.1
25.9
36.9
52.0
44.4
28.2
42.1
35.2
TGS-Agent [ 55 ] aaai26
42.7
52.3
47.5
68.3
77.0
72.7
55.5
64.7
60.1
AURORA [ 29 ] ∗ aaai26
50.5
61.1
55.8
55.0
64.4
59.7
52.8
62.8
57.8
Table 2: Comparison on R2 -AVSBench [ 55 ] . Results for existing methods are sourced from either TGS-Agent or our re-implementations (in ∗ ). Note that TGS-Agent employed external Grounding-DINO [ 26 ] for explicit object localization. J & F represents the average of J and F .
Table 6
Appendix figures & tables10 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Method
Seen ↑
Unseen ↑
Mix ↑
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
EEMC [ 43 ]
17.4
30.5
24.0
34.2
52.6
43.4
25.8
41.6
33.7
Crab [ 6 ]
25.1
40.7
32.9
32.3
50.5
41.4
28.7
45.6
37.2
TGS-Agent [ 55 ]
37.5
47.9
42.7
56.7
64.2
60.5
47.1
56.1
51.6
AURORA [ 29 ]
40.7
50.0
45.4
52.6
61.9
57.3
46.7
56.0
51.4
SAIL (ours)
53.1
62.4
57.8
65.7
72.8
69.3
59.4
67.6
63.5
Appendix
Table 5: Comparison with existing methods on the selective samples for target shift from Ref-AVSBench [ 43 ] .
Fusion
Residual
Gating weights
Seen ↑
Unseen ↑
Mix ↑
Null ↓
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
S
✓
60.9
70.5
65.7
65.4
72.7
69.1
63.2
71.6
67.4
0.027
✓
66.3
75.4
70.9
70.3
77.8
74.1
68.3
76.6
72.5
0.015
✓
✓
68.4
77.5
73.0
72.0
79.5
75.8
70.2
78.5
74.4
0.010
Appendix
Table 6: Ablation study on the shift-aware refinement module.
Method
Seen ↑
Unseen ↑
Mix ↑
Null ↓
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
S
LLaMA2-7B [ 37 ]
65.1
73.7
69.4
69.2
76.7
73.0
67.2
75.2
71.2
0.028
InternVL2-8B [ 2 ]
67.6
76.8
72.2
70.6
77.4
74.0
69.1
77.1
73.1
0.014
Chat-UniVi-7B [ 13 ]
68.4
77.5
73.0
72.0
79.5
75.8
70.2
78.5
74.4
0.010
Appendix
Table 7: Ablation study on LMMs. We replaced the MLLM in our SAIL with LLaMA2 [ 37 ] and InternVL2 [ 2 ] , respectively.
Method
Seen ↑
Unseen ↑
Mix ↑
Null ↓
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
S
α=0.1
68.4
77.5
73.0
72.0
79.5
75.8
70.2
78.5
74.4
0.010
α=0.2
67.2
75.0
71.1
70.8
78.2
74.5
69.0
76.6
72.8
0.011
α=0.5
66.7
74.3
70.5
70.1
77.6
73.9
68.4
76.0
72.2
0.012
α=1.0
63.4
72.4
67.9
68.5
76.7
72.6
66.0
74.6
70.3
0.017
Appendix
Table 8: Ablation study on the fusion coefficient α in the anchor alignment before the mask decoder.
Method
Seen ↑
Unseen ↑
Mix ↑
Null ↓
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
J
F
J & F
S
+ M2F
62.8
71.9
67.4
65.8
73.2
69.5
64.3
72.6
68.5
0.020
+ SAM
64.3
73.8
69.1
67.7
75.0
71.4
66.0
74.4
70.2
0.015
+ QP + SAM
66.9
76.1
71.5
71.0
78.5
74.8
69.0
77.3
73.2
0.010
+ SAM2
65.0
75.2
70.1
70.4
78.0
74.2
67.7
76.6
72.2
0.013
SAIL(ours)
68.4
77.5
73.0
72.0
79.5
75.8
70.2
78.5
74.4
0.010
Appendix
Table 9: Ablation study on the mask decoder. QP denotes the query propagation operation in OISA-1B [ 50 ] .
Figure 4: Additional qualitative results from EEMC [ 43 ] , TGS-Agent [ 55 ] , and our proposed SAIL on the Seen split from the Ref-AVSBench [ 43 ] dataset.
Figure 5: Additional qualitative results from EEMC [ 43 ] , TGS-Agent [ 55 ] , and our proposed SAIL on the Unseen split from the Ref-AVSBench [ 43 ] dataset.
Figure 6: Qualitative results on samples from the R2 -AVSBench [ 55 ] dataset. The two examples are from the Seen and Unseen splits, respectively.
Figure 7: Visualization of failure cases for the proposed SAIL on the Ref-AVSBench [ 43 ] dataset.
Method
Latency (ms)
FPS
Memory (GB)
SAM2-LOVE
54
18.5
12.4
Crab
115
8.7
18.2
SAIL
128
7.8
22.5
Appendix
Table 10: Latency and memory usage of different models.
Referring Audio-Visual Segmentation (Ref-AVS) seeks to localize and segment target objects in video frames based on visual, auditory, and textual referring cues. The task is challenging because the relevance of different modalities varies across referring expressions and scenes, while existing methods typically treat multimodal cues as homogeneous inputs for fusion, prompting, or reasoning, making them vulnerable to irrelevant or misleading modalities. To address this problem, we propose PRIMED, inspired by the biased competition theory in cognitive neuroscience, which explicitly models both visual perception and language-driven prior modulation, and enables more accurate Ref-AVS by adaptive modality suppression. Specifically, a Modality Prior Decoder first estimates whether the referring expression relies primarily on audio, vision, or their joint interaction, generating a modality prior to adaptively guide high-level attention. A Token Distiller further extracts compact global visual tokens from high-level features and shares them across Competition-aware Cross-modal Fusion modules to provide hierarchical global context. Additionally, we introduce a Spatial-Aware Semantic Alignment loss to further enhance foreground-background discrimination through contrastive learning. Extensive experiments on the Ref-AVS benchmark demonstrate that PRIMED achieves state-of-the-art overall performance.
Yuchen He, Jing Zhang
School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
This report presents an Audio-aware Referring Video Object Segmentation (Ref-VOS) pipeline tailored to the MEVIS_Audio setting, where the referring expression is provided in spoken form rather than as clean text. Compared with a standard Sa2VA-based Ref-VOS pipeline, the proposed system introduces two additional front-end stages: speech transcription and visual existence verification. Specifically, we first employ VibeVoice-ASR to convert long-form spoken input into a structured textual transcript. Since audio-derived queries are inherently noisy and may describe entities that are not visually present in the video, we then introduce an Omni-based judgment module to determine whether the transcribed target can be grounded in the visual content. If the target is judged to be absent, the pipeline terminates early and outputs all-zero masks. Otherwise, the transcript is transformed into a segmentation-oriented prompt and fed into Sa2VA to obtain a coarse mask trajectory over the full video. Importantly, this trajectory is treated as an initial semantic hypothesis rather than a final prediction. On top of it, an agentic refinement layer evaluates query reliability, temporal relevance, anchor quality, and potential error sources, and may invoke SAM3 to improve spatial boundary precision and temporal consistency. The resulting framework explicitly decomposes the MEVIS_Audio task into audio-to-text conversion, visual existence verification, coarse video segmentation, and agent-guided refinement. Such a staged design is substantially more appropriate for audio-conditioned Ref-VOS than directly sending noisy ASR outputs into a segmentation model.
Deshui Miao, Yameng Gu, Chao Yang +3
Pengcheng Laboratory · Harbin Institute of Technology · University of California at Merced
Audio-based Referring Video Object Segmentation (ARVOS) requires grounding audio queries into pixel-level object masks over time, posing challenges in bridging acoustic signals with spatio-temporal visual representations. In this report, we present VIRST-Audio, a practical framework built upon a pretrained RVOS model integrated with a vision-language architecture. Instead of relying on audio-specific training, we convert input audio into text using an ASR module and perform segmentation using text-based supervision, enabling effective transfer from text-based reasoning to audio-driven scenarios. To improve robustness, we further incorporate an existence-aware gating mechanism that estimates whether the referred target object is present in the video and suppresses predictions when it is absent, reducing hallucinated masks and stabilizing segmentation behavior. We evaluate our approach on the MeViS-Audio track of the 5th PVUW Challenge, where VIRST-Audio achieves 3rd place, demonstrating strong generalization and reliable performance in audio-based referring video segmentation.
Jihwan Hong, Jaeyoung Do
AIDAS Laboratory, 1IPAI, Seoul National University · AIDAS Laboratory, 2ECE, Seoul National University