How Should We Evaluate Naturalness for Synthetic Speech with a Foreign Accent?

Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Model (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive. We deconstruct "naturalness" into a linguistically grounded annotation schema spanning 10 distinct perceptual dimensions, and use it to construct the first dimension-level meta-evaluation benchmark for TTS, comprising 860 utterances annotated by trained linguist raters. Results from benchmarking four MOS predictors and four Audio-LLM judges reveal that MOS predictors are more sensitive to acoustic signal-level properties at the prosodic and paralinguistic levels, while Audio-LLM judges show selective, prompt-dependent detection that favors word-level errors and does not generalize across all dimensions. Neither class reliably captures a breadth of linguistically structured, human-perceptible speech errors. Our dataset, annotation schema, and evaluation code are publicly released to support more targeted and interpretable TTS evaluation.

Text-to-speech (TTS) evaluation is an open challenge. While the primary target was "naturalness," recent fidelity gains shifted focus toward "appropriateness" and whether speech is correct for its context. In this work, we examine how perception changes when the expected downstream use varies. We measure the appropriateness and human-likeness of five SOTA TTS systems across five domains: AI assistant, reader, actor, animated character, and spontaneous speaker. Results show appropriateness varies across domains independently of naturalness. While systems shine at reading, expressive domains remain challenging, and optimizing for one can degrade others. Furthermore, naturalness scores tend to penalize stylized speech while rewarding spontaneity. Finally, our study also highlights blind spots in one-size-fits-all evaluation metrics across more expressive domains. We demonstrate that TTS performance is not "solved" but depends on the target domain, requiring context-aware evaluation.

We present the CodecMOS-Accent dataset, a mean opinion score (MOS) benchmark designed to evaluate neural audio codec (NAC) models and the large language model (LLM)-based text-to-speech (TTS) models trained upon them, especially across non-standard speech like accented speech. The dataset comprises 4,000 codec resynthesis and TTS samples from 24 systems, featuring 32 speakers spanning ten accents. A large-scale subjective test was conducted to collect 19,600 annotations from 25 listeners across three dimensions: naturalness, speaker similarity, and accent similarity. This dataset does not only represent an up-to-date study of recent speech synthesis system performance but reveals insights including a tight relationship between speaker and accent similarity, the predictive power of objective metrics, and a perceptual bias when listeners share the same accent with the speaker. This dataset is expected to foster research on more human-centric evaluation for NAC and accented TTS.