RoboFake: Are Deepfake Detectors Ready for Humanoid Face Robots?

Talking-face (TF) deepfake generation synthesizes photore- alistic facial video from a static source image and an au- dio signal, producing forgeries that current image-based detectors consistently fail to identify. Unlike face-swap ma- nipulation, TF synthesis has no underlying real video from which to inherit physiological characteristics, making re- mote photoplethysmography (rPPG) a uniquely motivated detection modality for this forgery category. We propose a detection framework that extracts per-video rPPG wave- forms via RhythmFormer and trains a suite of lightweight classifiers to distinguish real from synthesized physiologi- cal signals. Evaluated on the TF subset of Celeb-DF++ un- der a strict subject-independent protocol, where test identi- ties are completely separated from training identities, our 1D ResNet achieves an AUC of 0.806 and EER of 27.8%, placing it within 2.4 points of the best published general- purpose detector (Effort, ICML 2025) while operating ex- clusively on the physiological channel. We document a con- trolled reproduction study of DeepFakesON-Phys, the rep- resentative prior rPPG detector, demonstrating degrada- tion from AUC 0.999 on legacy face-swap data to 0.622 on the TF subset of Celeb-DF++. We further show that detec- tion difficulty is strongly method-dependent: AUC ranges from 0.985 (Real3DPortrait) to 0.690 (IP-LAP) across the seven TF generators, with the ranking remaining perfectly stable across all evaluation protocols. This spread reflects an interpretable physiological property of each generator rather than evaluation noise, and constitutes the primary theoretical contribution of the work.

Advances in speech synthesis have made deepfake audio highly realistic. Earlier studies reported 70-80% human detection accuracy, but relied primarily on older synthesizers. We compare human detection for three selected voice synthesis tools released in 2019, 2022, and 2024 with 82 IT professionals, and benchmark humans against six pretrained detectors on the same material. For fully synthetic speech (full spoofs), the F1 score drops from about 90% for RTVC and YourTTS to 48% for ElevenLabs, although listeners were explicitly warned that deepfakes were present. For partial spoofing, where only one sentence of an utterance is altered, strict accuracy falls to 9%, and listeners classify the synthetic sentence as bona fide 77% of the time. Humans and detectors fail in complementary ways, and neither reliably localizes short manipulations. Additionally, listeners increasingly mislabel bona fide speech as fake, eroding trust in unmanipulated audio. These findings show that human perception alone is unreliable for the selected modern and partial-spoof conditions and motivate procedural verification, provenance, watermarking, and segment-level detection.

We introduce IRIS-GAN, a specialist forensic detector for synthetic face images under cross-generator shift. Rather than addressing universal synthetic-image detection, we focus on faces generated by generative adversarial networks (GANs), which are state-of-the-art in deepfake content, and train the detector through staged exposure to increasingly demanding GAN families while retaining earlier generators. The final model reaches fake-detection rates above 99% across the GAN families considered and classifies an external real-face dataset with 98.9% accuracy. Grad-CAM analysis further reveals measurable generator-dependent spatial response patterns, which remain informative for a secondary heatmap-only classifier. Out-of-family tests on diffusion-generated faces confirm that IRIS-GAN is a specialist detector, with some capability to reach non-GAN deepfakes. These results establish staged training as an effective strategy for robust GAN-face forensics.