Measuring the Inference Energy Efficiency of Open-Weight LLMs across Benchmarks, Reasoning Modes, and Hardware

While the large energy consumption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is recognized by the community, system operators lack guidance for energy-efficient LLM inference deployments that leverage energy trade-offs of heterogeneous hardware due to a lack of energy-aware benchmarks and data. In this work we address this gap with Watt Counts: the largest open-access dataset of energy consumption of LLMs, with over 5,000 experiments for 50 LLMs across 10 NVIDIA Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) in batch and server scenarios along with a reproducible, open-source benchmark that enables community submissions to expand this dataset. Leveraging this dataset, we conduct a system-level study of LLM inference across heterogeneous GPU architectures and show that GPU selection is crucial for energy efficiency outcomes and that optimal hardware choices vary significantly across models and deployment scenarios, demonstrating the critical importance of hardware-aware deployment in heterogeneous LLM systems. Guided by our data and insights, we show that practitioners can reduce energy consumption by up to 70% in server scenarios with negligible impact on user experience, and by up to 20% in batch scenarios.

Large language model (LLM) inference serving is priced by tokens, but GPU energy is consumed over inference windows. This accounting mismatch makes token-normalized metrics incomplete, since average output-token energy can decrease even when total request energy increases. We characterize this behavior with a decomposed energy model: a fixed one-time prefill with a fixed generation setup cost, while each output-token generation step adds marginal step energy. We evaluate this LLM inference energy model on NVIDIA H100 and H200 GPUs across dense and mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, reporting both request energy and token energy as functions of model type (M), phase (P), batch size (B), context length (C), and output length (N). For Llama-3.2-1B on H200 at batch-16 and context-4K, increasing output length from 10 to 512 tokens reduces token energy from 7.46 to 0.72 J/token while total batched inference-window energy increases from 1.19 to 5.93 kJ. Batching also reduces token energy, but the gain is context-bounded: at 10 output tokens, the batch-16 to batch-1 gain falls from 6.31x at context-512 to 1.17x at context-4K. MoE models amplify this effect: sparse routing and fragmented expert execution increase fixed energy at low concurrency, while batching spreads that energy across more generated tokens and substantially narrows the dense-vs.-MoE token-energy gap. These results show that energy-aware serving should jointly optimize both request energy and token energy, rather than only reducing per-token energy cost.

As large language models span dense, mixture-of-experts, and state-space architectures and are deployed on heterogeneous accelerators under increasingly diverse multimodal workloads, optimising inference energy has become as critical as optimizing latency and throughput. Existing approaches either treat latency as an energy proxy or rely on data-hungry black-box surrogates. Both fail under varying parallelism strategies: latency and energy optima diverge in over 20% of configurations we tested, and black-box surrogates require hundreds of profiling samples to generalize across model families and hardware. We present EnergyLens, which uses symbolic regression as a structure-discovery tool over profiling data to derive a single twelve-parameter closed-form energy model expressed in terms of system properties such as degree of parallelism, batch size, and sequence length. Unlike black-box surrogates, EnergyLens decouples tensor and pipeline parallelism contributions and separates prefill from decode energy, making its predictions physically interpretable and actionable. Fitted from as few as 50 profiling measurements, EnergyLens achieves 88.2% Top-1 configuration selection accuracy across many evaluation scenarios compared to 60.9% for the closest prior analytical baseline, matches the predictive accuracy of ensemble ML methods with 10x fewer profiling samples, and extrapolates reliably to unseen batch sizes and hardware platforms without structural modification, making it a practical, interpretable tool for energy-optimal LLM deployment.